1. Good music can neither be created, nor destroyed.
All the good music already exists. It does not matter how
many hours you spend at the keyboard trying to come up with something
new. All of your efforts are in vain.
2. The degree of disorganization in music increases to a maximum.
From now on, all music will be increasingly cacophonous. Any
new musical instrument that is created will be even more frightening,
unsettling, and disgusting than all preceding instruments.
3. As the tempo of music approaches absolute zero, the entropy of the
audience approaches a constant...
...a constant series of coughs, sneezes, shoulder
tappings, murmurings, and other general unpleasantness. No
interlude shall go unspoiled.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Happy Anniversary, PLoS ONE!
Today is PLoS ONE's second anniversary and we're celebrating by announcing that the winner of the second PLoS synchroblogging competition is SciCurious of the Neurotopia 2.0 blog.
"This fluent post captures the essence of the research and accurately communicates it in…
Well, at least Stevie Van Zandt and Britain's Youth Music seem to think so. A recent article in The Times refers to research by Youth Music indicating that the games have prompted upwards of 2.5 million children to take up musical instruments.
I'm skeptical. No doubt the games are a lot of fun for…
Owing to an overuse injury that has curtailed my running, I find myself gravitating toward my other main avocation, the drums, in order to maintain my sanity. These two things are at opposite ends of the spectrum: one is all about fitness, the other, skill. In the past couple of weeks I've been…
Everybody (well, mostly everybody) learns in science and physics class the Three Laws of Thermodynamics:
Energy cannot be created or destroyed, meaning that the increase in the internal energy of a thermodynamic system is equal to the amount of heat energy added to the system minus the work done…
1) as of when do you consider this true? Was it true for Thelonius Monk? For Art Tatum?
For Jelly Roll Morton? ... For J. S. Bach? Or maybe just last year?
2) The Moog was built on sine waves. It was preceded (greatly) by ...say... bagpipes. Would you like to reconsider?
3) *looks to the left* Psychiatrist? Ok... never mind. Tempo approaches absolute zero? Did music beat you up as a child?
The thing about music is, there is so much of it. If Sturgeon's Law applies to music (and I so no reason why it doesn't), and 95% of it is crud, there is still more good music than you will ever be able to process in your lifetime.
The average person's conception of what constitutes the complete range of "music" is only a tiny slice of what's out there. Most folks are unforgivably parochial when they speak of music. People have been making rich, complex, fully realized music for at least 80,000 years. More good music has been lost into the ether than all the world's libraries could ever hold. There were singers and composers walking across the Bering land bridge who could make you cry.
I have dedicated thirty years of my life to an infinitesimally tiny slice of music (early 20th century American popular music, mostly), and not a week goes by that I don't hear or read a song I've never heard before, and say to myself, "Damn, there is so much good music, and I'll never be able to learn it all."
And I'm a trained, discriminating listener, who finds 95% of what I hear unforgivably boring, drab, dull, and awful. Consider: I have absolutely no use for rock music -- no offense to those who do. And yet, I know that there are more subgenres of Death Metal alone than the average headbanger can begin to deal with.
I haven't even begun to expose myself to the Edo-period shamisen repertoire, or Australian clapping-stick music, or Beijing opera, or Carnatic music, or Fado, or Hi-Life, or Soviet film music, or Choctaw round-dance music, or the music of 19th c. Buenos Aires salons, or ....
Elliott Carter is still writing so #1 cannot be true
Oh OK, I'll bite just to keep you happy.
1. Who decides if it's good or not? You, perhaps? What culture/prejudice/historical era are they/you in? If a time machine had brought back recordings of Stravinsky for Mozart to hear, would he have unequivically declared it 'good', 'bad' or the work of a madman?
2. This may have been true in the 50s and 60s classical scene but it's definitely not true today.
3. Doesn't this all depend on how "good" the audience perceives the music to be? Alcohol seems to play a significant role too.
Good wind-up though.
thanks
still writing so #1 cannot be true
This may have been true in the 50s and 60s classical scene but it's definitely not true today.