Similarities between the BP Disaster and the Tepco Disaster

A little less than one year ago, the major environmental news pertained
to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.  From Wikipedia:


The Deepwater Horizon oil spill (also referred to as the BP
oil spill, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, the BP oil disaster or the
Macondo blowout)[4][5][6] is an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico which
flowed for three months in 2010. The impact of the spill continues even
after the well has been capped. It is the largest accidental marine oil
spill in the history of the petroleum industry.[7][8][9] The spill
stemmed from a sea-floor oil gusher that resulted from the April 20,
2010 explosion of Deepwater Horizon, which drilled on the BP-operated
Macondo Prospect.

Of course, the huge environmental news today is the nuclear crisis in
Japan, stemming from damage to the href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_I_Nuclear_Power_Plant">Fukushima
Dai-Ichi power plants. 



It occurs to me that both of these disasters have a common cause: they
were caused by desperate efforts to wring cheap energy from
nature.  The Macondo well was drilled in very deep water. 
This is difficult and hazardous.  We would not do it if we were
not desperate. 



The Fukushima Dai-ichi power units were built in the late 1960s to late
70s.  One could argue that the continued operation of the units
reflected a desperate need for more cheap energy.  The units were
old; their designs, obsolete . 



Both href="http://www.propublica.org/article/bp-had-other-problems-in-years-leading-to-gulf-spill">BP
and href="http://my.firedoglake.com/jimwhite/2011/03/14/tepco-has-scandal-plagued-past/">TEPCO
have histories of malfeasance and cover-ups. 



Debt-based economies require a positive growth rate in order to keep
functioning.  That is, if the economy does not grow enough for all
the accululate interest-on-debt to be paid, defaults inevitably
occur.  But economic growth requires either even-increasing energy
expenditures, or ever-increasing improvements in efficiency. 
Therefore, there is a great need to constantly increase energy supply,
given the political impracticality of getting people to become more
efficient.  We are trying to increase supply, despite a stread
decline in energy return per unit of energy invested ( href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EROEI">EROEI). 
Hence, the desperation, hence the disasters.  We have had two
major disasters now in less than a year.  This is not a good sign.


More like this

BP's just released 2010 Annual Report to shareholders is proforma, with the exception of a detailed section titled "Gulf of Mexico Spill." (p.34; you can read the full report here.) No bonuses for the top Executives this year, but rewards for "good business results." Something to think about the…
by Elizabeth Grossman The 398-page National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling final Report to the President on the Deepwater Horizon: The Gulf Oil Disaster and the Future of Offshore Drilling, released January 11, offers a scathing critique of the offshore oil-…
The final report from the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling was just recently submitted to President Obama. Will lessons be learned from this disaster? The announcement today does not bode well. I fear that we will be paying for the BP oil spill for…
by Elizabeth Grossman When the BP/Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded on April 20, 2010, killing 11 of the 126 workers on board and critically injuring three, the ruptured Macondo well - located nearly a mile beneath the sea surface about 50 miles southeast of Venice, Louisiana - unleashed what has…

"This history is important, because it clearly shows that the nuclear science is not the problem. One cannot honestly discuss the so called irrational panic of the public without discussing the fact that safety records have been falsified and problems downplayed routinely. The publicâs distrust and fears are mostly rational and justified. ... is inherently unsafe and too complicated to be safely handled by humans under the pressures of human society, which includes economical and political pressures."
From:
http://www.science20.com/alpha_meme/fukushima_nuclear_reactor_truth_loc…

The publicâs distrust and fears are mostly rational and justified. ... is inherently unsafe and too complicated to be safely handled by humans under the pressures of human society, which includes economical and political pressures."

I agree that the ever-growing economy is an old model of how to live on planet Earth...it worked for a while, but now we can see the End Game and it is obvious that we all need to learn to be happy with less STUFF and get back to a sustainable economic culture. Everything in my world comes from an oil source: mostly in the form of plastic or wood held together with glues (from oil)...so it is a stretch for my to imagine a time when that is no longer "the norm." But I yearn for that time...because I know it is the only way to back off on pushing the fragile Earth Ecosystem to its breaking point.

distrust and fears are mostly rational and justified. ... is inherently unsafe and too complicated to be safely handled by humans under the pressures of human society, which includes economical and political pressures."