Why Iraq is Doomed

The economists Alberto Alesina, William Easterly and Janina Matuszeski have recently published a working paper analyzing the "artificiality" of Iraq's borders. Their conlusion is sobering: Iraq is a fake state, a lingering blot of colonialism that merges different ethnicities together with little regard for how they might co-exist. The paper seems to support those politicians arguing for some kind of partition. Is Iraq the new Yugoslavia? Are our soldiers trying to hold together a country that shouldn't even exist?

Artificial states are those in which political borders do not coincide with a division of nationalities desired by the people on the ground. We propose and compute for all countries in the world two new measures how artificial states are. One is based on measuring how borders split ethnic groups into two separate adjacent countries. The other one measures how straight land borders are, under the assumption the straight land borders are more likely to be artificial. We then show that these two measures seem to be highly correlated with several measures of political and economic success.

Tags

More like this

This article is reposted from the old Wordpress incarnation of Not Exactly Rocket Science. Everybody, apparently, needs good neighbours, but in many parts of the world, your neighbours can be your worst enemy. In the past century, more than 100 million people have lost their lives to violent…
I guess it is unlikely you have not already heard about the big brouhaha that erupted when Bill Donohue targeted PZ Myers for showing disrespect towards a belief that made some religious nuts go crazy and violent against a child (yes, Eucharist is just a cracker, sorry, but that is just a factual…
In fact I'm not quite as certain of the Right Thing as my headline suggests; but if I'm going to nail my colours to the mast in advance of the UK's parliament's probable vote next week, I may as well be definite. It puts me with Jeremy Corbyn and against most of the UK pols. I don't feel involved…
Who are these people, and what are they doing?  They are Democratic congresspersons, sheepishly "caving in".  Not only did they cave on the timeline for withdrawal of military and mercenary forces in Iraq, they failed to heed this warning: href="http://www.upi.com/Energy/Briefing/2007/05/24/…

Most of the countries "created" in 1948 are such conglomerates of multiple tribes and cultures, divided with utterly arbitrary borders by the departing remnants of a hundred year old colonial past that had no place in FDR's post-war vision. Some have theorized that the Marshall Plan and other post-war relief efforts into Europe were done partially on the condition that the European powers end their colonial domination over the 3rd World.

the vast majority of Africa is in this same state. Some regions have managed to live peacefully, others have remained in tribal warfare for decades.

By Joe Shelby (not verified) on 01 Sep 2006 #permalink

Multiethnic states are not necessarily doomed, even if their origin was an arbitrary decision of colonial powers. In the case of Iraq, the people there seemed to be quite ok with the borders of the country, and with living with other sects around (see, for instance, this column by an Iraqi scholar who works in the US). By organizing everything since the invasion along sectarian lines, and applying the "divide et impera" principle, the US created the current civil war. A case of self-fulfilled prophecy, if there ever was one.

By Irrelephant (not verified) on 01 Sep 2006 #permalink

Irrelephant:

Are you serious? The guy who wrote that article has quite the selective memory.