Art and Nudity

Sometimes I'm amazed at the pockets of ignorance lurking in our midst. This is the sad story of a Texas art teacher who got suspended for taking her class to the museum. Her crime? Letting her innocent pupils glimpse some 16th century paintings that - gasp! - revealed a nipple or two. If the mirror of art reveals our own reflection, then this is sad indeed. The same artistic subjects that were suitable for pre-Enlightenment Europe - even religious paintings used to celebrate the nude body - are now deemed pornographic. Manet is laughing at us:



More like this

Would it be cruel and unusual to wake Cousin E with a rousing rendition of the Brigands' Song from the Ronja movie? Went to the snow-covered golf course, sat down in the moon shadow of a spruce tree at the edge of the fairway, watched until I had seen three meteors, went home. Place-name scholar…
Ambivalent Academic made a fascinating observation today about certain parts of the animal rights movement: What really strikes me is that a lot of this rhetoric reads like snuff-porn. [...] There is an undercurrent of appetite for the kind of violence they describe. It reads as if they take…
[More about photography, children, childpornography, pornography, porn; fotografi, barn, pornografi, porr, barnporr, barnpornografi.] In issue 2011:1 of Fotografisk Tidskrift, the journal of the Swedish Photographer's Association, is a fine essay in Swedish by Jens Liljestrand (Twitter @…
A red fox (Vulpes vulpes), photographed at Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge, Delaware

Prudery and censorship is alive and will. There is a difference between nudity and nakedness, even if not everyone recognizes it. Pictures of people without clothes and statues with no garments in a museum. Who'd of thunk it.

I would feel safer if my daughter were visiting an art museum than if she were working as a page in Washington, DC!