Alex Ross, music critic for the New Yorker, thinks that he has found a great new composer. There's only one catch: this composer doesn't even know how to read or write music. (Did I mention she's also a kitten?):
It is risky to attempt an analysis of such an intricate musical conception after only a few auditions, but I am ready to hail this fluffy young composer's work as a captivating and utterly fresh synthesis of late twentieth-century minimalist tendencies with the chromatic language of canonical European modernism.
I can definitely hear the Schoenbergian influences. Watch the full composition (and creative process) on You Tube.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Friday Not-So-Random Five
I decided in honor of the new year, I'd do something a bit different this week. Instead of
doing a random shuffle on my IPod, I separated out my favorites of the modern classical pieces that I discovered this year. Some of these are brand new recordings just released this…
I've expounded on the principle of crank magnetism. Basically, crank magnetism is the tendency of cranks not to mind the crankery of other cranks, even if the two forms of crankery are mutually exclusive. But it's more than that. It's the tendency of a single crank to be attracted to several forms…
John Corigliano, "Fantasia on an Ostinato": Corigliano is absolutely my
favorite modern composer. He writes stunningly beautiful music. This is a wonderfully
subtle piece: unaccompanied solo piano. Just incredible.
Isis, "Not in Rivers, But in Drops": The transition between the last one
and…
Recently I attended a concert featuring the premier of an up-and-coming composer's work. She gave a brief talk before her piece was played, during which she explained the complex symbology of her work. The musical notes weren't just noises; they were intended to convey a meaning above and beyond a…
Watching key depressions vis a vis pitch, I have to cast doubt on the entire enterprise, though the Kitty in question is indeed a major cutie. Perhaps as much or more to the point is Why Cats Paint. I have the book http://www.amazon.com/Why-Cats-Paint-Theory-Aesthetics/dp/0898156122
and could just about believe that it was not a put-on till I discovered a complementary book, with complementary authors,
http://www.amazon.com/Why-Paint-Cats-Ethics-Aesthetics/dp/1580082718
My skepticism wrt feline aesthetics (though I love them dearly) does not interfere with my rather firm opinions about giving our primate cousins the vote. I don't know about gibbons, but would not want to be accused of species-ism.