Americans Get Wise to Energy

James Carville thinks he knows what Americans care about. Via Thomas Friedman:

"Energy independence," Carville said. "It's now the No. 1 national security issue. ... It's become kind of a joke with us, because no matter how we ask the question, that's what comes up."

Coming in No. 1, with 42 percent, was "reducing dependence on foreign oil." Coming in a distant second at 26 percent was "combating terrorism." Coming in third at 25 percent was "the war in Iraq," and tied at 21 percent were "securing our ports, nuclear plants and chemical factories" and "addressing dangerous countries like Iran and North Korea." "Strengthening America's military" drew 12 percent. Mr. Carville also noted that because their polls are of "likely voters," they have a slight Republican bias -- i.e., they aren't just polling a bunch of liberal greens.

But here's the problem with energy independence as a political issue: the most viable solution (some say the only viable solution) is higher energy taxes. I'm no political expert, but I'm willing to wager that Americans will be less enthusiastic about energy independence when it isn't just about SUV hybrids and ethanol production. While I'm thrilled that Americans have finally focused on energy policy as a genuine security issue, I'll be even happier when they realize that the solution requires sacrifice.

PS. It's worth noting that liberals aren't the only ones calling for higher gas and energy taxes. Bush's former economic advisor and Alan Greenspan have both insisted that America must raise the gas tax.

Tags

More like this

On energy policy, all eyes turn to McCain. Earlier this week I spotlighted the unheard of 20-30 point shift since February in how Americans view what should be done about the energy problem, with as many liberals now as conservatives favoring energy exploration and investment in nuclear power over…
As loyal readers of this blog know by now (I'm talking about you, Mom), I've got a soft spot for gas taxes. In fact, I'm pretty convinced that America needs a higher gas tax, phased in over several years (so the working poor can adjust their driving habits). Over the past few weeks, I've noted that…
Democracy Corps just released a major study of 49 House districts currently held by Republicans. The Ryun-Boyda race is not yet in the top 49 races, but pollster Stan Greenberg and strategist James Carville are thinking that Democrats need to challenge more than just those 49. Stan Greenberg…
It's the worst of all possible worlds: gas prices have gone up, but Americans haven't adjusted their gasoline consumption habits. Instead of using higher energy costs as a prod to use less energy (or at least use less foreign oil), we have fully acclimated to the price at the pump: In the late…

What? We can't have something for nothing?

But seriously... we have plenty of crappy states that should simply be covered with wind turbines and solar panels. I don't really know what we're waiting for.

North Dakota, for sure...

I think the greens need to spend more time talking up the following chain of logic:
1. The entire planet is going to need carbon-neutral technology in very short order.
2. The country that becomes the leaders in developing carbon-neutral technology will be getting a lot of customers as other countries find it easier to buy it rather than develop their own.
3. If the United States makes an effort to become that leading country, that will create jobs and bring in wealth from around the globe.