Pets Get a Political Voice

This is great news. As an animal lover, I can certainly see how the Humane Society has tremendous political potential. From the WSJ:

For the first time in its 50-year history, the Humane Society is trying to elect candidates to Congress who support its animal-welfare agenda. After a series of mergers with other animal-welfare groups, the Humane Society counts 10 million Americans as members, an average of 23,000 in each of the 435 House districts. That's more than twice the membership of the National Rifle Association, which is considered one of the most effective single-issue campaign organizations.

More important, the Humane Society's motivating issue -- the promotion of animal welfare -- resonates with the white suburban women who could be the key block of voters who decide this election.

Tags
Categories

More like this

While reading the June issue of Nature, I saw an editorial piece called Last Rites which touched on a subject which interests me: humane euthanization of lab animals.
It's that time of year, when the International Whaling Commission gets together and pretends its decisions will be based on the best available science.
We were away for the weekend, so I'm a day behind in reading the Sunday Times.
Over the weekend, some readers sent me a link to a story that, presumably, they thought would be of interest to me, given that I graduated from the University Michigan Medical School back in the late 1980s. Specifically, it's a report that U. of M.

Coturnix makes a good point. Here in Arizona the Humane Society has been backing a proposal which would require pig farmers to give pregnant pigs cages large enough to turn around in. Not all pigs, just pregnant ones. The opposition is running full page adds in the paper misleading voters with the headline that PETA is the big supporter of the proposition. The animal rights extremists will always be used against any animal welfare candidates or proposals.