John Whitley under attack

John Quiggin comments on this Gun Control Australia press release attacking John Whitley (see also Eugene Volokh's comments). Ditto on Quiggin's Voltaire/JS Mill allusions, but I think everybody is paying too much attention to this. I believe that they may have made their attack on academic freedom just to generate some publicity and controversy. You can read Whitley's response to them here---note that he ignores that part of the press release.

Quiggin also writes:

Sadly for Whitley, I think anyone associated with John Lott is going to have a hard time getting ARC money or anything else that involves research cred. Lott's disgraceful antics have been particularly damaging to his co-authors, including Whitley

Yes, Lott's name isn't even on the Stanford Law Review paper any more, so Plassmann and Whitley have been left with the responsibility for the coding errors in that paper. And despite months going by they have not addressed this problem. It is sad, and it is bad for Whitley's career.

More like this

I've discovered another one of John Lott's attempts to rewrite history. Read on. Lott has written a response to Kevin Drum's summary of Lott's model changing antics. Here's Drum: 1. Lott and two coauthors produced a statistical model ("Model 1") that showed significant crime decreases when…
John Quiggin comments on the collateral damage the Lott affair has inflicted on Lott's allies and supporters. Chris Lawrence has an update to his earlier post. Tapped has a brief summary of the latest installment in the saga. Julian Sanchez and Kevin Drum mention Lott's response,…
I asked Ben Horwich, the president of volume 55 of the Stanford Law Review to comment on Lott's latest complaints<.phpa>. He writes: I did not categorically promise Lott that we'd run a verbatim statement by Plassmann and Whitley. I did express my interest in working with them to…
David Glenn has an article (subscription required) in The Chronicle of Higher Education on the Ayres/Donohue/Lott dispute. Here are the responses from Lott and Whitley to the allegation of coding errors: Mr. Lott replies that the alleged coding errors are irrelevant to the larger debate. "…