I'm a holistic doctor

Ok, I know I've been digging up old posts lately, but it's because I love them so darn much. Thanks for your indulgence. --PalMD

That's apparently all it takes to be a "Holistic" practitioner. I've been searching online for their medical board, or for any consistent definition of "holistic medicine". What's involved? Where do I get my training? Is training standardized, and based on good standards of evidence?

According to the American Holistic Medical Association:

Holistic Medicine is the art and science of healing that addresses care of the whole person - body, mind, and spirit. The practice of holistic medicine integrates conventional and complementary therapies to promote optimal health and to prevent and treat disease by addressing contributing factors.

Sounds good; art and science of caring for the whole person...sound a lot like, well, non-"holistic" medicine. As to integrating "conventional and complementary therapies", I'm not sure what that means (but I hope they will tell me). As I've written earlier\, there is that which works, and that which does not.

In practice this means that every person is seen as a unique individual, rather than an example of a particular disease.

Every person who comes to see me is, by definition, a person and a patient, but not simply one or the other. They are also both a "unique individual" and "an example of a particular disease". To ignore the disease part leaves the "medicine" out of "holistic medicine".

Disease is understood to be the result of physical, emotional, spiritual, social and environmental imbalance. Healing therefore takes place naturally when these aspects of life are brought into proper balance. The role of the practitioner is as guide, mentor and role model, the patient must do the work - changing lifestyel, beliefs and old habits in order to facilitate healing. All appropriate methods may be used from medication to meditation.

"Disease is understood to the be the result of...imbalance." That's nice. Warm. Pretty. And wrong. Disease is not understood that way, nor should it be. We know the pathophysiology of most disease, and "imbalance" isn't part of it. Let's take heart attacks. They arise out of complex set of factors: genetics, blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, stress, inflammation, cholesterol. We even know how to interrupt the march toward a first or repeated heart attack. To top it off, modern medicine knows how to effectively treat a heart attack.

To treat the the patient "holistically", I must convince the patient that I understand these factors, and that they must work with me to change them---quitting smoking, changing diet, exercise, medications---all these things require the patient to trust in me and my judgement. Some of these modalities are more effective than others. Quitting smoking is more important that meditation (unless meditation helps you quit smoking). In a large percentage of people, diet and exercise cannot achieve the proven goals for blood pressure, cholesterol, and diabetic control. These folks need medicines. It's not a failure, it's science.

The whole thing is quite vague. All good doctors take into account "physical, emotional, spiritual, social, and environmental" factors affecting their patients. We already have a label for that---it's "physician".

If holistic medicine is to differentiate itself from "mainstream" medicine in a positive way, it will need to define itself very carefully. What are the goals? How do we measure achievement of these goals? Are we fumbling around in the dark trying to "achieve balance" or actually going about treating patients in a compassionate, evidence-based way?

Holistic medicine exists as a concept, perhaps, for two reasons. First, doctors are seen as lacking compassion for the whole person (actually a fallacy--most people like their doctors, but never mind that). Second, many doctors and patients wish to express this compassion through routes that are not proven, but seem nice, like "alternative therapies".

We need to continue to train our doctors, especially our primary care physicians, to use knowledge wisely, and to exercise compassion.

That's why I'm hanging out my shingle. I am a holistic doctor.

Tags

More like this

When those of us who practice real medicine write about implausible medical claims, we are often accused of lacking compassion, as if offering false hope is the same as compassion. We are also accused of turning away from therapies that "couldn't hurt". After all, if someone wants to use…
I'm a primary care physician. What I, other internists, pediatricians, and family medicine docs do is prevent and treat common diseases. When we get to diseases that require more specialized care, we refer to our specialist colleagues. There is a movement afoot to broaden the role of naturopaths…
"Holistic." How often do we hear that word bandied about by practitioners of "complementary and alternative medicine" (CAM) or, as it's increasingly called, "integrative medicine" (IM)? Lots. The reason is that CAM/IM practitioners seem to think they own the word. They've so utterly co-opted it…
It should come as a surprise to no one that I'm not exactly a fan of "integrative oncology"—or integrative medicine, or "complementary and alternative medicine" (CAM), or whatever its proponents want to call it these days. After all, I've spent nearly ten years writing this blog and nearly seven…

Huh, if you're holistic, where are your made-up qualifications, then?

Where is evidence of your membership of the Society of Holistic and Alternative Medicine? Are you certified as a Licentiate in Integrative and Alternative Remedies, eh? Why don't you have those initials after your name instead of the pathetic MD, which can only stand for Maker of Diseases?!

Must go and pray over my car now, it's been running a little rough recently. I think it has imbalance in the fourth chakra close to the central meridian, but a large quartz crystal hasn't healed it yet. It's got me baffled.

Sam C is right. I havn't even once heard you recommend tha tpeople avoid foods in the nightshade family, or that wheat and cows milk are toxic, or even that taking massive amounts of garlic can cure a sinus infection.

:-)

On the other hand, it is fun to watch "homopatic medicine" devotees boggle when yopoint out that vaccines are the ultimate homeopathic medicine:

A small amount of what causes the disease neutralized to the point where it doesn't cause the symptoms, but will protect you from the disease.

I think it's really ironic that homeopaths object to vaccines.

Ironic, perhaps, but not surprising. Homeopathy has its own version of vaccines--nosodes--which is fitting mostly because homeopathy rejects germ theory, so there's no reason to expect them to give vaccines any credit.

I'm setting up a weekend workshop where you can get qualified in Ancient Mystical Didgeridoo Quantum Crystal Healing. I learned it when I fell into a deep trance on a tourist trip Ayer's rock. It was only a few minutes of what probably looked to others like falling asleep on the tour bus, but in my deep timeless state the ancient Bushmen came to me and laid out the whole science of quantum healing using didgeridoo vibes, after taking me on a magical journey through the Dreamtime.

The whole weekend only costs $1500 US, but you also have to buy my book ($50) plus the correct healing crystals (which I just happen to keep in stock to save you having to comb the planet for them like I did - add on $375), and one of my specially constructed PVC tube didgeridoos which have been blessed by a real aborigine (add $150). These didgeridoos generate exactly the right vibes to stimulate the recombination of the quantum particles for healing. Plus I have the certificates ready for wall-hanging, with even a couple of little crystals embedded in the frames! Perfect for you tea-parlour/healing room at home!

There is a site that has examples of aura camera systems at www.auracamera.com that prints aura photos. Has anyone experienced this system?