Cato has a Blog

Well, kind of. The Cato Institute has launched an interesting new project called Cato Unbound. It's a combination blog/magazine billing itself as "a virtual trading floor in the intellectual marketplace, specializing in the exchange of big ideas." Each month they will present an essay by a prominent scholar on some big issue of the day, then they will present critiques of that essay and an exchange of ideas with other prominent scholars, who will respond to the original essay and to one another. And they're off to a great start.

The first issue has an essay that answers the question of what three constitutional amendments would you pass if you had the power to do so today, and it's written by James Buchanan. Who's he? Only a Nobel Prize winner in Economics. His essay will be critiqued by Akhil Amar, one of the more brilliant legal scholars in the country, by Alex Kozinski, one of the more brilliant Federal judges in the country, and by William Niskanen, chairman of the Cato Institute. That's a hell of a lineup of thinkers. This will be well worth reading every month.

More like this

I've mentioned before being on the Worldview Weekend mailing list. This is basically a group of religious right types who meet, appropriately, in Branson fairly regularly. They send me a list of articles on their website every week and it's typically a source of much amusement. No group that…
Akhil Amar, one of the very best constitutional scholars in the nation, has an essay at Slate about the controversy over the FBI's search of the office of a congressman in a criminal investigation. He says pretty much exactly what I've been saying since the day it happened, that the only problem…
Another outbreak of debate about originalism as the proper mode of constitutional interpretation has broken out all around the blogosphere, particularly among some of my favorite legal scholars. It began with Larry Solum lamenting the fact that so many legal scholars continue to use original intent…
The Boston Globe had an article written by Dave Denison about judicial activism on Sunday. The results were mixed. On the one hand, Denison does a fine job of illustrating what I have said previously (here and here, among other essays), that claims of "judicial activism" rarely have any objective…

Nit: there is no Nobel Prize in Economics There is a Nobel Prize in "Economic Sciences" in memory of Alfred Nobel. The prize winner is selected by the Bank of Sweden.

One might consider it a minor issue, but I, quite frankly, do not. It bothers my partner--who was trained in economics--but from what I can tell, economics is largely a political activity.

http://nobelprize.org/economics/laureates/

"a virtual trading floor in the intellectual marketplace, specializing in the exchange of big ideas."

What pretentious twaddle. Generally when making an analogy it helps if there's an isomporhism.

By Ginger Yellow (not verified) on 06 Dec 2005 #permalink