I just happened to catch this last night. When Sen. Lindsey Graham began his questioning of Alito, he joked about Alito having said he didn't recall something by saying something to the effect of, "We can only hope that if we come before you in court you'll be as gracious in accepting our lack of recollection of any involvement with Jack Abramoff." That's not an exact quote, but it's the gist of the joke. And it got quite a laugh.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
More senators are openly expressing their concern regarding Alberto Gonzales' lack of integrity and his fitness to serve as this nation's Attorney General. The clock is ticking until the fine day when we finally shed this scumbag Attorney General ...
"We have to have an attorney general who is…
I am not sure how many of you are listening to the Gonzales hearings, but you can pick them up, live and streaming, from WNYC-AM. Basically, as summarized in the below cited transcript, Gonzales is in trouble, and will either have to admit he is lying under oath or that he is an absentee/…
... are here.
Unfortunately, I'm not sure that Paul quite understands how homeopathy supposedly works. He's gotten the claim that dilution and succussation make a substance more potent right, but I think he's misinterpreted the homeopathic principle of "like cures like." (As I've pointed out before…
The state of Washington may soon not be alone in its ban on internet gaming. Republicans in the House are pushing a bill to make that ban nationwide. The bill has made it through committee and will be coming to a floor vote this summer. And predictably, they're trying to sell the bill with two…
Alito does seem to have major memory issues, he doesn't recall a hell of a lot at all. A good reason not to confirm him is his lack of recollection in a great number of things, my geuss is either he's senile or smoking dope. I used to smoke a lot of pot yet I can remember every organization I've been a part of, why I believed in every cause I've believed in and for the most part the people I was involved with. definately senile, unless you want to think he's lying.
One doesn't get nominated for the highest court in the land if you can't recall simple facts about one's own history. Or so I'd like to think...
"We can only hope that if we come before you in court you'll be as gracious in accepting our lack of recollection of any involvement with Jack Abramoff."
Wow, talk about blatant!
This is a picture of the future. Scalito might just get confirmed and one day all these Abramoff cookies will start lining up in his court for some payback.
It wasn't really a joke, but instead a barbed suggestion to imbibinous Ted and the bumbly crew to be more collegial.
As a libertarian who hates republicans and democrats, I can't help but notice a discrepancy in the adversarial process of judicial confirmation for the supreme court.
Scalito will be confirmed because he is considered highly qualified by actual legal experts, not the bimbos on the committee.
I'm baffled by the continued use of the term "Scalito". The two are really quite different.