More Deutsche Dodging

You gotta love this. George Deutsche continued his dodging in an interview with the New York Times. Here's my favorite line:

"When I left college," he said, "I did not properly update my resume. As a result, it may appear misleading to some. However, I was up front with NASA about my undergraduate status when they hired me."

Apparently he thinks that on a resume, you put in all the stuff you hope to accomplish later and then delete them if you don't before you send it out. He also says that the email demanding that the word "theory" be appended to "big bang" every time it was mentioned on a NASA website was just his own opinion sent to a fellow Christian, not a directive:

In an e-mail message, Mr. Deutsch said that remarks about religious views on the creation of the universe sent last October to a Web designer working on a presentation on Albert Einstein were "personal observations" and never were reflected in the material that was posted online.

"We are both Christians, and I was sharing with him my personal opinions on the Big Bang theory versus intelligent design," Mr. Deutsch wrote to The Times. "What I said about intelligent design did not affect the presentation of the Big Bang theory in the subsequent Einstein Web story. This is a very important point, because I have been accused of trying to insert religion into this story, which I was not trying to do."

First of all, the Times noted that this email actually instructed the web designer on what words to put in, so the notion that it was just a "personal opinion" is nonsense. Second of all, this still doesn't excuse his abysmal ignorance in thinking that the big bang is "not proven fact; it is opinion" or the fact that no one who would make such a ridiculous comparison should be in any position at a scientific agency. I say this guy still has a future in politics. He's already mastered the art of confidently asserting the truth of a transparent lie.

Tags

More like this

In addition to my disagreement with PZ on some things, I absolutely agree with his post about the administration's many attempts to subordinate good science for political considerations. Many other people have written about this around the blogosphere, based on this article in the New York Times…
Remember the story the other day about a 24 year old journalism graduate named George Deutsche who didn't know what the word "theory" meant and was telling the scientists at NASA what they can and can't say on the website? As it turns out, he wasn't even a journalism graduate. Texas A & M…
I've occasionally joked in the past that it's unfair that the biologists get all the attention from the religious wing nuts. I mean, modern cosmology ought to be just as big an affront to the young-earth creationist types as evolution, so what are we, chopped liver? Of course, now that a story has…
You can hear an interview with George Deutsche, the boy wonder who just resigned from NASA because he lied on his resume about having graduated from Texas A&M, here. It's pretty funny stuff. I especially like his defense of having lied on his resume. Host: Was it public, I mean, it was pretty…

I say this guy still has a future in politics. He's already mastered the art of confidently asserting the truth of a transparent lie.

I would wonder if he had sufficient time to garner the requisite experience to become a revolving door lobbyist?? Oh wait, he could just put that on his resume anyway. Oh no, that's right, it already is on his resume.

Ed said:

Apparently he thinks that on a resume, you put in all the stuff you hope to accomplish later and then delete them if you don't before you send it out.

You should see my resume...three Nobels (only one shared), a Tony and two Cy Youngs on that puppy.

First of all, the Times noted that this email actually instructed the web designer on what words to put in, so the notion that it was just a "personal opinion" is nonsense.

Is "personal opinion" the same as a "personal theory" to Georgie do ya think?

However, his political career is 20 years in the future when they start recycling this administration's appointees like this administration did with Ronald Reagan's appointees.

Having listened to the interview, I must say that the New York Time's writeup of it was extremely kind.