Dubai Company Pulls Out of Ports Deal

Interesting development:

A Dubai-owned company abruptly abandoned its plans for managing U.S. ports on Thursday, defusing an election-year showdown between President Bush and the Republican-controlled Congress over an issue that had become a political land mine for the GOP.

"DP World will transfer fully the U.S. operations ... to a United States entity," H. Edward Bilkey, the company's top executive, said in the surprise announcement that seemed to spread relief throughout the Capitol and the White House. It was unclear which American business might get the port operations.

Just hours earlier, Republican House and Senate leaders privately told the president that Congress was all but certain to block DP World's plans. Under pressure from a disapproving public, a House committee overwhelmingly voted against it Wednesday. The leaders told Bush the Senate would inevitably do the same, despite his threats to veto any legislation killing the deal.

This is pretty much done for the same reason Harriet Miers pulled her nomination for the Supreme Court. It was proving highly embarrassing for the President, and since he can't possibly admit to having made a mistake, someone else has to take the fall for it (not that this is in any way unique to this president, but it's still the truth).

Tags

More like this

I'm afraid I just don't get the Bush administration's position on turning the control of our major ports over to a company owned by the United Arab Emirates. It's just obviously a bad idea, obvious enough that even the Congressional leadership of both parties seem to be able to recognize it. And…
Washington Monthly has an interesting set of essays by prominent conservatives on why they want the Republicans to lose in November. Joe Scarborough writes of the virtues of divided government during the 90s: The fact that both parties hated each another was healthy for our republic's bottom line.…
If George Bush is driving our nation down a one-way road to hell, it's the Republican-controlled House and Senate that are enabling him to do this. On October 17th, Bush signed into law the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which had previously passed the Senate and House on the 28th and 29th of…
James Dobson is one of the few religious right leaders who has endorsed the nomination of Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court (Jay Sekulow of the ACLJ being the other notable one). But Dobson has been spouting off about his inside information. We know from reports that Karl Rove was dispatched to…

While I think the result is telling -- it won't end any friends amongst the internet Democrats.

For better or worse, their are two (that I know of) US based companies that can handle these contracts -- one of which is Haliburton, and the other had significant defense ties.

My first thought was also the Harriet Meirs fiasco and the unwillingness to take ownership over policy decisions, for better or worse. . .

By Mike Heath (not verified) on 10 Mar 2006 #permalink

It's a shame it had to end this way in my opinion. This deal wouldn't have been any more dangerous than a deal given to South Korea. And it would have been a major step towards development in the middle east and the moderation that follows it.

Is this really "pulling out of the deal," or are they just creating a new U.S. subsidiary to hold the companies that manage U.S. ports?

Call me a dirty cynic, but it wouldn't surprise me if it turned out that the whole circus had been inspired by the company which eventuall would have won the deal.

Or Mr Lippard is right and it's just a smoke screen by the Dubai company.

By Roman Werpachowski (not verified) on 10 Mar 2006 #permalink