1. dispatches
  2. Veterans on Flag Burning

Veterans on Flag Burning

By stcynic on June 21, 2006.

As the Senate prepares to debate a constitutional amendment to ban flag burning, and appears to be only one vote away from passing it, ThinkProgress has put together a short list of statements from veterans who are opposed to such an amendment. I'll just highlight a couple of them. From Colin Powell:

The First Amendment exists to insure that freedom of speech and expression applies not just to that with which we agree or disagree, but also that which we find outrageous. I would not amend that great shield of democracy to hammer a few miscreants. The flag will still be flying proudly long after they have slunk away.

And from former Senator Bob Kerrey, former Navy SEAL and Congressional Medal of Honor winner:

Real patriotism cannot be coerced. Our freedom to speak was attacked -- not our flag. The former, not the latter, needs the protection of our Constitution and our laws.

Hear, hear.

Tags
Liberty

More like this

Alter on Flag Burning Amendment
Jonathan Alter has a compelling essay on the flag burning amendment under consideration - again - in the Senate (it's already passed the House). I'm with him on this one being a litmus test: The phrase "litmus test" is in bad odor for good reason: politicians should be judged on a variety of…
It appears to be that time of the year again ...
Apparently Bill Frist has decided that constitutional ammendments against flag-burning and gay marriage are vital to national well-being. Speaking on Faux News, Frist was asked: HOST: Are gay marriage and flag burning the most important issues the Senate can be addressing in June of 2006? Below…
Bush Seeks Judicial Activism to Overrule First Amendment
I'm so pissed off about this that I woke up at 2:30 am seething and I had to get up and write this. Just read this and tell me that this doesn't deserve a gold medal in the 100 meter stupid hypocrite freestyle: President George W. Bush plans to seek a court order to force the U.S. Federal Election…
Flag Burning Amendment Fails By One Vote
The latest attempt to pass a constitutional amendment allowing Congress to pass laws against flag “desecration” failed by one vote in the Senate. It had already passed the House. Had it passed the Senate, it would surely have gotten the approval of the necessary three-fourths of the states. Here'…

I have e-mailed my senators. Has everyone else?

By Mark Paris (not verified) on 21 Jun 2006 #permalink

... and I heard back from Sen Saxby Chambliss, who "proudly" supports this resolution.

By Mark Paris (not verified) on 21 Jun 2006 #permalink

Well being from Alabama I am sure both my Senators will support the amendment, but I have e-mailed them nonetheless. The Powell quote is good stuff, hadn't heard that before.

As a veteran (more than 20 years active duty, but whose counting?), I took an oath several times during my career. It was not to protect the flag, nor support the president (although I was sworn to uphold his lawful orders), nor to god or mom or apple pie or any other emotion evoking image. No, I swore "to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

And you know the law I would like to see passed...

...Anyone who knowingly or reasonably should have known, violates the protections guaranteed by the Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution shall be punished by a fine of not less than $200,000 and prison term of not less than 20 years.

I wonder how many flag-wavers in congress will take up my cause? (Alright, I know how many, but it would make a veteran who took his oath seriously proud)