Gay Adoptions Stand in Indiana

The Indiana state Supreme Court rejected an appeal of a lower court decision that paves the way for gay adoptions in that state. Bravo.

Tags

More like this

The Arkansas Supreme Court has handed us another major victory for gay adoptions, ruling that the state's child welfare board cannot prohibit gays from being foster parents. "There is no correlation between the health, welfare and safety of foster children and the blanket exclusion of any…
Colbert King wrote a fascinating column in the Washington Post the other day about the history of laws against interracial marriage, or miscegenation. He points out that the appeal to natural law, longstanding tradition and religious tenets, so often heard as arguments against gay marriage, were…
I found this trackback to an angry and not terribly coherent response to my post about Catholic Charities pulling out of the adoption business. Someone named Aerik Knapp-Loomis didn't like that I require comment registration, so he posted his comment to his own blog and called me out for a "…
The Supreme Court today refused to hear a case asking them to overturn the Massachusetts State Supreme Court decision on gay marriage. Now one might wonder why on earth someone would try to appeal a state supreme court decision based solely on provisions in that state's constitution to the US…

Another reason to be proud that I'm a Hoosier. Along with .... uhhhh, birthplace of Kurt Vonnegut and .... uhhh, we've got lots of corn.

RyanK

Reading through the article, I'm dismayed (again) by the complete inability of people to understand the duties of the judicial branch:

The decision also disappointed state Sen. Jeff Drozda, R-Westfield, who is opposed to same-sex adoptions. He said the courts were not representing the views of Hoosiers. He said he will introduce legislation in 2007 to bar same-sex couples from adopting.

"The concern that I have is that the integrity of the judicial and the legislative procedures is in jeopardy because the court has decided to legislate, and I believe that is the role of the General Assembly," Drozda said. "The intent of the court is not the intent of the assembly and not the intent of Hoosiers across the state."

Of course the court isn't representing the views of Hoosiers--it's not supposed to! *devolves into incoherent, angry mutterings*