Olympic-sized viral swap fest?

China now admits what everyone knows already knows. It had a death from H5N1 in November of 2003, a full year before its "official" first case (The Guardian). In fact everyone also knows that there was H5N1 in February of that year when the disease was diagnosed in Hong Kong in a family just returned from a visit to Fujian province. That occurred at the outset of China's now infamous SARS cover-up. As interesting, the Chinese explanation for why the case not been reported earlier, was it had been misdiagnosed as a SARS case. This may in fact be what happened but it raises another question: why wasn't the SARS case reported? The SARS outbreak had stopped by mid summer and, to our knowledge, no other cases were reported except a suspect one in a TV reporter in December 2003. The misdiagnosed case was in a soldier of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) and hence was treated in the separate military hospital system, the very system implicated most deeply in the SARS cover-up earlier in the year.

Parallels with SARS are instructive. The disease almost certainly started in south China and by the time it had spread to many other countries around the world the Chinese were still reporting very few cases. There was widespread suspicion they were covering up the disease but accurate information was difficult to come by. You can get a chilling account in Karl Taro Greenfeld's book, The China Syndrome, which for all its virological errors (mostly minor) is a wealth of information by a reporter who was on the scene and part of the team that broke the story of the cover-up for Time magazine.

Truthful reporting about a disease outbreak of global significance (first thought to be H5N1) was secondary to the Chinese regime's paramount goal of political stability. SARS occurred during a delicate moment of transfer of power from Jiang Zemin to Hu Jintao and amajor disease outbreak was not the proper background for this important event. But there was also uncertainty in the division of power between the old leader, Jiang, and the new one, Hu. Jiang's powerbase was in the PLA and Hu adroitly used the blown cover-up to clean house and consolidate his own power and support. From that perspective, China's commitment to openness was part of a political tactic. The subsequent failure to disclose a SARS case at a time when Hu's control was established reinforces this and also suggests the Chinese are covering up -- intentionally -- the severity of their H5N1 problem.

What's their reason for doing so? We see three. An entrenched habit of information control from on high and a timidity at all lower levels of the bureaucracy. Even minor disclosures in a society where disease outbreaks are officially considered state secrets can bring on severe consequences. Second, political stability is still the paramount objective and it is intimately tied to economic issues. Third, there is an important event that would be threatened by labeling China a hotbed of bird flu virus. Beijing is scheduled to be the host of the 2008 Olympics. This is a powerful incentive for a cover-up.

It should also be a powerful incentive for the rest of us to take a hard look at China. Beijing will be a potential swap fest for viral exchange for peoples around the world. Olympic sized.

More like this

The latest chapter in the Chinese Disease Cover-up Follies involves a just published report in the New England Journal of Medicine by eight Chinese doctors reporting the genetic sequences of an H5N1 case that occurred in November of 2003. Old news. Except China didn't officially report its first…
What do you do when the chickens come home to roost and they look healthy (but might not be)? Ask the folks in Hong Kong. Except they don't know either. Update, 6/15/06: The Chinese Ministry of Health is confirming the diagnosis of H5N1 in the 31 year old truck driver from Shenzhen. He is now…
In an example of the adage, "Be careful what you wish for," China's choice for WHO Director General, Dr. Margaret Chan, is already finding her reputation will be held hostage to the behavior of China itself, not an enviable position. The new chief of the World Health Organisation, Margaret Chan of…
Since the way Chinese public health officials traditionally save face is by covering their ass, when I hear things like this I don't automatically believe it: "With initial efforts of containment, actually we not only reduced the impact of the first wave to China, but we also won time for us to…

Re: "Even minor disclosures in a society where disease outbreaks are officially considered state secrets can bring on severe consequences."
Do we know what rewards were bestowed upon Drs. Zhu, Qin, Wang, Yu, Liu, Hu, Hu, & Cao, who reported this case in NEJM 354;25?

Although the natural spread of the SARS outbreaks ended in about July 2003, there were three subsequent episodes of human cases (that we know of) -- due to lab accidents:

August 2003 in Singapore
December 2003 in Taiwan
March/April 2004 in Beijing

Lawrence Altman describes these episodes in "The Doctor's World: SARS' Second Act, Playing in Laboratories," New York Times, May 18, 2004, still available on line at:
http://tinyurl.com/zegc7

By Path Forward (not verified) on 10 Aug 2006 #permalink

China has never been forthcoming or honest on any matter that might compromise its "face" or honour.The upcoming Olympics will only make a bad situation worse.Who the heck voted for this venue anyway?Sit back and watch the chemically induced 'other sex' win medals galore.Yeah,I will watch the events with some degree of horror and fascination.Bring it on.