-
Trying valiantly to avoid getting scooped.
-
The trouble you can get into by voicing enthusiasm.
-
Considering the official criteria and the (apparently) actual criteria for successful grant proposals.
-
A good reason to cultivate the habit of keeping up with the literature sooner, rather than later.
-
What forces keep scientists from communicating as freely as they might?
- Log in to post comments
More like this
A Natural Scientist: In Which All's Well That Ends Well (At Work)
1. Get it in writing! 2. If you didn't get it in writing, be stubborn!
(tags: work lab-life women-in-science)
The Junction Potential: Electrophysiology isn't a technique you add to your CV; it's a state of being!
"Not a bad idea…
At DrugMonkey, PhysioProf explores the rules of engagement between grad students in journal club and seminar presentations (building off of interesting explorations of this question from A Lady Scientist, Dr. Jekyll & Mrs. Hyde, and Acmegirl -- all of which you should click through to read in…
Matt Thurling on the concept of science.TV « Pimm - Partial immortalization
"Science" seems to mean very things to scientists and non-scientists, which complicates the project of communicating about science.
(tags: science-communication)
Recognition and Alleviation of Distress in Laboratory…
About a week ago, my brother sent me a couple of interesting papers about funding in science, one in Canada, the other in the UK. I barely had time to skim the abstracts at the time, but thought I would put it up for discussion online and come back to it later. So I posted the link, abstract and…