Liveblogging the conference: Stephen Peck

Lunch being had we crowd into a new room to hear Stephen Peck, a biologist from Brigham Young University down the road a ways in Provo. Stephen is talking about ecological boundaries.

A group of ecologists set up seven different ecosystem groups for agroecosystem studies. They debated how to define an ecosystem, and it simply got harder. They needed a biological indicator to determine the state of the ecosystem and couldn't even get to defining the latter. Over fifteen years, he hasn't been able to figure it out.

Properties of ecosystem boundaries:

  1. Fuzzy
  2. Non-regulated -> Highly regulated
  3. Perspectival
  4. Structured by multiple processes
  5. Multiple scales of space and time
  6. Not fixed spatiotemporally
  7. Resistant to general definition

They have various degrees of boundary sharpness, they are regulated in different ways, they depend on the perspective of the observer, structured by a range of underlying processes, they move and shift. A list of structuring processes followed.

Why do boundaries matter? Evolution - gene flow and isolation depend on boundaries (what puts the "sym" in sympatric); ecology - it's where the competition happens.

Boundaries are perspectival - relative to what the boundary is constituted by. E.g., lake trout versus muskrat as markers of a lake boundary. One has different "edges".

Territorial boundaries structured by conspecifics as well as ecological resources. E.g., warblers and nesting sites determined by light and places to nest.

Is there a theory of boundaries? Do they have something in common? How can we recognise them?

Divide the world into patches and boundaries. Steeper gradients across boundaries, boundary function may be defined by flow of energy across them. [Cadenasso et al.]

Relevance to conservation of areas like Yellowstone.

More like this

Jay is an ecological philosopher. He wants to sketch how ecologists have used boundaries, and outline both a skepticism and an interactive approach. He's not talking about types of ecosystems but tokens; not biomes, for example. Second, some ecosystems are sociopolitical objects (Greater…
Roberta is a great philosopher from UC Davis and she's talking about the notion of populations. Known she needed a definition of population for a long time - this is a first stab. "Population" has many definitions by biologists. Most try to limit it by space or time or interbreeding. But very…
Just lately there's been a flurry of papers on speciation that I haven't had time to digest properly. Several of them seem to support "sympatric" or localised speciation based on selection for local resources with reproductive isolation a side effect of divergent selection. So here they are below…
The journal Nature has just published a massive feature series on, to use a well-worn phrase, "the limits to growth." The centerpiece is a graphic created by Johan Rockström of the Stockholm Resilience Centre and his colleagues as part of "a new approach to defining biophysical preconditions for…