Evolutionary genetics nerds might find this picture of interest. Look to the top right.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Everyone knows, or should know how much I like MythBusters. Here is the problem. Below is a picture of Adam analyzing the motion of a an exploding water heater.
Actually, I applaud Adam for his creative use of the vernier caliper. Really, it is an example of "making things work". However, in…
... are not confined to any one area of interest. Check out this post on How Not to Manage Your Image at Almost Diamonds. It is all about this picture:
Well, it's not really all about that picture, but that picture might be what draws the corporate lawyers to my site to force me to take it down…
In The Hopeless Monster? Not so fast! Bora says:
In a back-and-forth with a commenter, Coyne defends himself that he is talking about the changes in genes, not evolution. This just shows his bias - he truly believes that evolution - all of it - can be explained entirely by genetics, particularly…
The title is, obviously, an overstatement, exaggeration, and blatant misrepresentation. But it gets your attention, don't it? Anyway, Hawks has been questioning whether genomics is really any different from genetics. In this post, he says something that I've been thinking for a while:
"Actually…