Have you seen Yahoo answers?

The two most annoying kinds of "hits" from an internet search are:

1) When you find a site with your question rephrased exactly as it should be, and the first few sentences of the answer you need, but to continue ... to be able to read the answer ... you must register, and possibly even pay; and 2)

When all you can find is the answer on Yahoo Answers.

The blockbuster success of Yahoo! Answers is all the more surprising once you spend a few days using the site. While Answers is a valuable window into how people look for information online, it looks like a complete disaster as a traditional reference tool. It encourages bad research habits, rewards people who post things that aren't true, and frequently labels factual errors as correct information. It's every middle-school teacher's worst nightmare about the Web.

Indeed. Not only are the answers often wrong, but it is generally not possible to tell if something is wrong by looking at it.

Read this thoughtful critique of Yahoo Answers on Slate.com

More like this

There are nearly 500 complete responses to the survey from last week. Here's a CSV file of the results. Below the fold are the frequencies as well as N's. I might report some trends in the data, but a lot of it is predictable.
It turns out the answer is "yes" ... ... according to Yahoo Answers. Also, in answer to the question, "Can a Jedi Lighsabe cut through Superman?" the answer is: It depends. Nice to see Yahoo Answers deals with the subtleties.
Here's a logic puzzle for you: Suppose I offer you a million dollars, in return for which you agree to answer a certain yes/no question. You can answer either truthfully or falsely as you desire. That's it. Should you accept that offer? Solution below the fold.
Imagine that you are doing a physics lab to measure the velocity of a small projectile. After making a bunch of measurements to four significant figures, and doing a bunch of arithmetic, you get a value of 4.371928645 m/s.