Cosmic Rays Do Not Cause Global Warming

On the face of it, it is impossible. Cosmic rays vary over time, and climate varies over time, and the two variations do not correspond. Global temperature has been going up over the last century, in correspondence with increased of atmospheric CO2, and this makes sense because the physics says that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and this whole global warming thing is a greenhouse effect. Bringing cosmic rays into the situation seems both unnecessary and difficult to do.

But it turns out that there is a cosmic ray - climate connection which is interesting if it turns out to be true. But this connection is NOT any kind of link between cosmic rays and global warming. Cosmic rays do not cause global warming. Did you read that last sentence? OK, good.

It turns out that cosmic rays may play a role in how particles of stuff cause the aggregation of water vapor into droplets. However, this effect is not entirely clear and seems to only work on some kinds of particles, and there is zero. Zero. (did you read that part where I said "zero"?) correlation between amounts of cosmic rays and anything at all related to climate.

Zero, nada, zilch, nothing, kitu haiko.

Global warming denialists, however, that they would like to do more damage to our public understanding of science than they already have by breathlessly connecting this recent interesting research on cosmic rays and more earthly substances to global climate change to the exclusion of that which we know is real.

Moth Eyes has a nice write-up on this and a few nice graphs as well.

More like this

This is just one of dozens of responses to common climate change denial arguments, which can all be found at How to Talk to a Climate Sceptic. Objection: Climate scientists never talk about water vapor, which is the strongest greenhouse gas, because it undermines their CO2 theory. Answer: There is…
Back in July, David Evans had on opinion piece in the Australian claiming: The greenhouse signature is missing. ... The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. This is wrong. The hot spot is not the signature, since you get a hot…
New Research on the Effects of CO2 Pollution A paper just published in Nature reports on the direct measurement of the effects of human greenhouse gas pollution on the heating of the Earth’s atmosphere. This is empirical verification of anthropogenic global warming. Since the Industrial Revolution…
The Australian continues to display its contempt for science, scientists and the scientific method. They've published this piece of AGW denial by David Evans. Last time I looked at Evans he was saying that new evidence since 1999 had changed his mind about global warming, with this new evidence…