Unread comments

So nicely coinciding with a period in which I have no time, I have had a burst of over 100 comments in the last week, lately on the temperature record reliability attack article. (Yeah, I know it no PZ Meyers level of activity, but it is all relative, right?)

For the first time in my illustrious blogging career I have not even read them! (which I regret).

Did I miss anything interesting?

Tags

More like this

As threatened a little while ago, this is the first of ten hopefully weekly posts looking back at the ten years this blog has been in operation. This one covers the period from the very first post on June 22, 2002 to June 21, 2003. When I started doing this look back, I was more than a little…
The schedule called for this to appear last Friday, but as I was just back from a funeral, yeah, not so much. I had already gone through and bookmarked a whole slew of old posts, though, so here's a recap of the 2003-2004 blogademic year (starting and ending in late June). This year saw a few…
The other day, PZ Myers noted in a Blog post the remembrance of the École Polytechnique massacre in which Marc Lépine hunted down and killed 14 women, injured another 10 women and a handful of men, as his way of striking out against feminism. To be clear, he was hunting down and killing feminists…
Happy New Year to everyone! I'm back from my lovely New Years vacation, and I wanted to take a moment to look back on my first full year as a blogger for ScienceBlogs.com. (This will be for the last year and a half actually, since I didn't do this last New Year's.) First, let's do some numbers.…

If by interesting you mean macho chest beating and recycled denialist crap, then yes. Otherwise, not so much.

I peeked. It's a circle-jerk between crakor, vernon and richard.

Get a room, dudes.

For a moment there i thought you were talking about me, who is this "crakor" of which you speak of dogs arsa?

I suspect a lot of this started up again as a result of the package sent by the Heartland Inst. to hundreds of TV weather folks. The package contained a glossy booklet with an article claiming the temp. record is unreliable.

Indeed, it is the same old recycled junk long since dismissed in real science journals.

Dan

The package contained a glossy booklet with an article claiming the temp. record is unreliable.

That's Anthony Watts' vanity press book of fine art photography.

Which he claims scientifically proves that taking pictures of weather stations causes them to warm up or something.

dhogaza,

Taking pictures of a weather station makes it warm up, thats a real funny one.

On the other hand there are standards to which all stations should be built. This ensures that the readings they take are accurate, these accurate readings are then used by various departments to establish many things one being temp trends.

Are you saying we do not need accurate readings to establish trends dhogaza?