Open thread on saturation arguments

Please place any additional comments/replies about CO2 and H2O and absorption and greenhouse gases etc here...

[Update: I meant additional to the digression on the "did greenpeace lie" thread.]

Tags

More like this

This is just one of dozens of responses to common climate change denial arguments, which can all be found at How to Talk to a Climate Sceptic. Objection: H2O is 95% of the Greenhouse effect, CO2 is insignificant. Answer: According to all of the scientific literature and climate experts I am…
This is just one of dozens of responses to common climate change denial arguments, which can all be found at How to Talk to a Climate Sceptic. Objection: Climate scientists never talk about water vapor, which is the strongest greenhouse gas, because it undermines their CO2 theory. Answer: There…
Jeremy Jacquot has written a three part debunking of the claims in Joane Nova's "Skeptic's Handbook": Part 1: increasing CO2 won't make much difference, Part 2: warming has stopped and ice cores show that CO2 increases do not cause warming, and Part 3: the hot spot is missing. If all this seems…
Via R4 and mt, Scientists fear climate change speed-up as oceans fail to hold greenhouse gases. Its about the North Atlantic, which is absorbing less CO2 over the last 10 years (note that the article, wrongly, says holds half; Slioch, who does a rather good job in the comments, picked that one up…

You're right that one is missing from the HTTTACS guide. The comments I am inviting here are additional to those off topic on the "did greenpeace lie" thread...