Hmmmm. Somehow I didn't think this was what one normally thinks of when one hears the term "coming out":
You know. Sometimes tolerance is not called for.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Over at the Sandwalk, Larry has a video of Berlinski pompously denouncing the idea that "cows evolved into whales". As everyone is pointing out, it's ludicrous because cows didn't evolve into whales — but what struck me is the supercilious arrogance of this mathematician as he plucked numbers out…
I went through an Orson Scott Card phase while I was in graduate school. I started with his most famous novel, Ender's Game, which I enjoyed immensely. I then proceeded, over the next year or so, to read all of the novels he had written to that point.
At that time I didn't know anything about Card…
Did you hear about the scio10 civility meltdown? More about that in a minute. As you may have heard, it got a bit. . . uncivil. I wasn't there, so you, like me, will have to get your impression from this highly realistic renactment, created by an attendee who witnessed the confrontation between…
The Bottleneck Years
by H.E. Taylor
Chapter 32
Table of Contents
Chapter 34
Chapter 33
Jon Visits, January 27, 2056
On Sunday Jon called to say he would be dropping around to visit next week. The Senator was scheduled to hold a series of meetings with Provincial and First Nation leaders. He…
Very amusing comic, especially if you roll over the red button at the end.
(trying not to spoil the comic for those who haven't read it yet)
I use homeopathic logic. The less sense it has, the stronger my argument.
By diluting one's compassion one hundred million-fold, isn't it actually stronger?
Excellent find.
Technically, it's by diluting someone's hate that their compassion grows stronger right? So, by hating more, they love less, and by loving less, homeopathy says that their hate should grow more, so you get a double whammy, unless the large presence of hate already there cancels out the homeopathic compassion, which should nullify the love...or something like that. I wonder if homeopaths say you can treat, say, a poisoning, with a homeopathic dilution of that same poison, because now it's no longer dilute, right, and the homeopathic dilution thing is reversed so it loses it's opposite-curing mojo. Ugh, theoretical homeopathy makes even less sense than standard homeopathy.
Off topic, but Andrew Wakefield is getting pummeled in the news:
http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&cf=all&ncl=dcSQq1P9xZATABM0oyvTTZ…
Charles Sullivan beat me to it!
Here's a link the to the CNN story:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/05/autism.vaccines/index.html?hpt=T1&…
Blammo.
Indeed, I think we'll be hearing some gleeful Insolence on this soon:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/05/AR20110…
Good for the BMJ, calling a fraud a fraud!
Scottynuke: A-yep. In fact I have a feeling we not only know what Orac's next post is going to discuss, we even know what will be in its title: "Elaborate Fraud".
Just saw the Anderson Cooper interview. Could have been better but it was damn embarrassing to Wakefield. Mnookin followed and was good. Sanjay Gupta tried to recapture some small measure of contact with science.
Just saw the Anderson Cooper interview. Could have been better but it was damn embarrassing to Wakefield. Mnookin followed and was good. Sanjay Gupta tried to recapture some small measure of contact with science.
@#2 Roadstergal: Dad?! I didn't know you used the internet!
Good news about Wakefield, though.
I thought Cooper was pretty good for a layman, but Gupta could have done much better.
Good ol' Handley calls for a vax/no vax study, and the Parker/Spitzer duo just let it fly by. I'm going to lose my voice screaming at the TV machine.
The editor's note in latest issue of The Lancet refers to the predictions/wishes of the Lancet editor Squire Sprigge for the decade beginning 1911:
The times the are a-changing.
I think that allegations of fraud would have been brought up sooner and would have been investigated more seriously if not for the draconian English libel laws.
if god is not human, god lacks human compassion or hate.
then by the theory of dilution, compassion or hate divided by zero means god's hate and compassion must be infinite.
now that i've cleared that up, i'll be off to cure world peace.