When Adjusted for Age, Unemployment Is Worse Than in the Early 80s

If you take the raw numbers, the 1982-3 recession seems worse compared to the current depression: after all, during that time, unemployment stayed above ten percent for seven months. But that's deceiving, because the composition of the workforce was different then--workers, on average were younger.

Here's how today compares with 1982-3 when broken down by age:

Slide1

For nearly every age cohort, unemployment is higher now than in the 80s. Since the workforce is older now, and unemployment is typically concentrated in younger workers, if we had the same population demography we did in the early 1980s, we would have a higher unemployment rate than we currently see:

If the labor force is adjusted to the (younger) age composition of the labor force during the 1982-83 peak, today's unemployment rate is actually higher, not lower than it was in 1982-83.4 Figure 4 shows the age-adjusted unemployment rate since 1981.5

After adjusting for the aging of the population since the early 1980s, the current labor-market downturn has resulted in both a higher unemployment rate and a longer period when the rate of unemployment remained over 10 percent. The unemployment rate peaked in December of 1982 at 10.9 percent, yet fell to 9.9 percent by June of 1983. For seven months, the rate of unemployment held at over 10 percent. On the same age-adjusted basis, the unemployment rate has been over ten percent for thirteen consecutive months, including five months over 11.0 percent and reaching 11.2 percent in October of 2009. Over the last twelve months, the rate of unemployment has never fallen below 10.8 percent.

I think this explains, in part, why there is a disconnect between policy makers and the larger public about unemployment: for most people, the reality is that unemployment is worse than it was thirty years ago. When people compare their circumstances to their parents', they realize they're worse off. In many ways, this is an atypical firing pattern: older workers aren't more secure. This also leads to economic insecurity among workers who are far more worried about this--younger workers can recover, are more flexible, have fewer obligations (e.g., mortgages) than older workers. Needless to say, this is politically combustible.

But I'm sure all that fiscal austerity will fix this in no time....

Tags

More like this

For today, anyway. Brad DeLong is the only one out there who is as flummoxed, not to mention frustrated, as I am about the complete lack of responsiveness by the political system to nine percent U3 unemployment, and one out of six U.S. workers being un- or underemployed. DeLong nails it (italics…
by Kim Krisberg It's not news that unemployment is bad for a person's health. But it turns out that just the threat of unemployment is bad as well. A recent study, published in the September issue of the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, found that perceived job insecurity is also…
If you are reading this you didn't die in 2005. But 2,447,903 Americans did die (if you aren't an American the good news is you aren't at risk of being included in the American death numbers). These are preliminary numbers, just released by CDC and the seven significant figures is a bit of -- what…
Over at Why Evolution Is True Greg Mayer wonders: I also recalled that the percentage of religiously unaffiliated had gone up noticeably from 1990 to 2008, and that another survey found the percentage was higher among young people. What could have happened so that younger people, growing up in the…