from the NY Times:
The news that Wine Spectator magazine was scammed into giving an Award of Excellence to a non-existent restaurant has been greeted with guffaws by schadenfreude fans and with fury by the magazine's editor.
But longtime readers of the Dining section might have seen this coming. Five years ago Amanda Hesser wrote that the magazine granted the award, the lowest of three levels of recognition by the magazine, without actually inspecting the restaurants involved.
Some of the reader comments at the Times site, however, note a more complex story:
It seems the halls of journalism are full of smoke and mirrors. (And people drinking wine.)
Tags: wine, New York Times, WIne Spectator
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Another Wine Experience: A Romp thru Northern Italy's Lake Country
By Erleichda (about the author)
We touched down very early in Milan on what, for all eight of us, would mark the beginning of our hiking week in the Lake Country of northern Italy, a destination we had chosen after last year's…
Of the first dozen times or so that I ever saw Joel, my then future brother in law, I think we were in a restaurant a good four or five times. This was probably just a chance event, but there were a number of dinners and one lunch with the family that Joel and Alyssa (Amanda's sister) attended.…
I
really like the idea behind the Farmer's Diner. This guy,
Tod Murphy, started a restaurant that only servers food that was grown
or produced within seventy miles.
There's
an interview with him in
href="http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/272/"
rel="tag">Orion…
Amanda, a fellow hot-pepper-lover, reminds me that I have not finished my Hot Pepper series. It is supposed to be a THREE-part series, but I only wrote two parts so far, the introductory (personal) post and answering the question why are peppers hot (quite a popular post of mine, linked and e-…
When I first read about this, I thought it was kind of funny, but after reading Amanda Hesser's article and the response by the Wine Spectator article, I don't think Goldstein's accomplishment is all that great. This is what I especially don't like (if true) from the WS editor:
"In the case of Osteria L'Intrepido:
a. We called the restaurant multiple times; each time, we reached an answering machine and a message from a person purporting to be from the restaurant claiming that it was closed at the moment.
b. Googling the restaurant turned up an actual address and located it on a map of Milan
c. The restaurant sent us a link to a Web site that listed its menu
d. On the Web site Chowhound, diners (now apparently fictitious) discussed their experiences at the non-existent restaurant in entries dated January 2008, to August 2008."
It seems like WS did its due diligence in trying to see if the restaurant is real. I especially think the fake Chowhound reviews are in poor taste. Spammy comments pollute online communities; people other than WS might have gone looking for this restaurant and found nothing. While you may disagree with WS criteria, it's not like they led anyone astray in thinking they would actually visit the restaurant.