Carl Zimmer has never written a bad book, and he's the author I usually recommend to non-scientists looking for a gentle but substantive introduction to ideas in biology. Now DarkSyde interviews Zimmer—this is one you'll want to read.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
A few disclaimers: I do get kickbacks from affiliate programs when you purchase books after clicking through those links. If you'd rather not fund a perfidious atheist's book addiction, just look up the titles at your preferred source—I don't mind. This list is not a thinly-veiled attempt to get…
Even though I sometimes feel quite anxious about the publication of Written in Stone, the positive comments the manuscript has received so far have helped to relieve my apprehension. Professional reviews will not show up for another few months, of course, but during the process of composing the…
As you've probably heard, Stephen Meyer of the Discovery Institute published a book last year calle Signature in the Cell. It stunk, it got virtually no reviews from the scientific community, although it was avidly sucked up by the fans of Intelligent Design creationism. One curious thing about the…
Another question from a generous donor, in this case Natalie, who asks:
As for my question, how about "who is your favorite author, and why?" or, if you'd rather, "what's your favorite book, and why?"
This is a difficult question, because it's subject to a sort of quantum projection noise. That…
Maybe not, but he sure as hell wrote a bad chapter about guinea worm in 'Parasite Rex.'
As with George Orwell, I really love the essays: they are gems -- they are well thought out, include some wonderful details, and are well-structured. But there is one complaint I have regarding Carl Zimmer which is the same for Trent Reznor and the rest of Nine Inch Nails -- you just don't put the stuff out often enough!
Maybe not, but he sure as hell wrote a bad chapter about guinea worm in 'Parasite Rex.'
As in, "Sloppy Writing", "Sloppy Science", slang for positive, or an all-too-illuminating "EEEeewwwwww!!!!"
Blazing factual error, claiming there is a drug treatment, which there isn't; shilling for Big Pharm.
I wasn't impressed with the rest of the book, either.
The whole premise is that there are four times as many parasite as host species. He never even hints where that number came from, does not address the fact that if some species -- mine, for example -- have more than an order of magnitude more kinds of parasites, then some must have few or none; and what does that mean?
There are illustrations that are not explained or even identified, including one of an arthropod that somehow takes the place of a fish's tongue; and I'd have liked to have known more about that.
I didn't know anything about Zimmer when I bought the book. It was an offering of a science book club, as I recall; and one reason I don't belong to that club any more. After reading it, my assessment was that he was a hack with a library card who didn't really understand what he was writing about.
Excuse me, Harry? Everyone's entitled to their opinion about a book, but you are way out of line.
You complain that I said there is a drug treatment for guinea worms, when there isn't. I can't imagine how someone could be more precisely wrong about what I wrote: "There is still no vaccine for guinea worm disease, nor is there even a medicine known to work against it." [p.205]
As for there being four parasites for every one host, that estimate comes from Robert M. May, "How Many Species Inhabit the Earth," Scientific American, October 1992. Sorry if you don't quite like that estimate, but I suspect that I'd trust an expert like Dr. May on this one.
As for you claim that I'm a hack who doesn't understand what I'm talking about, let me defer to Albert Bush, one of the leading parasitologists in the world, who reviewed my book for the journal Science. He wrote, "Read Parasite Rex. Read it twice."