9 out of 10 biologists agree!

Chemistry stinks.

(via Uncertain Principles)

Tags

More like this

Because if there were no anthropocism contest, I wouldn't be able to enter it. (via Uncertain Principles)
Along with tacky an inescapable Christmas music, December brings lists, as every publication that deals with music at all puts out their own compilation of songs or albums of the year. The definitive Uncertain Principles Songs of 2006 list will be coming up, but if you're just dying to see ordered…
SPECIAL NOTE:This page and its subordinate pages will no longer be updated. See the new page at my new blog for the live version, and change all your subscriptions. Thank you. This is a list of the Basic Concepts posts being put up by Science Bloggers and others. It will be updated and put to the…
Any other notable blogs starting with U? UDreamOfJanie Uggabugga Ugly Overload The Unbearable Lightness of Being a Postdoc Unbossed Uncertain Principles Unclaimed Territory (Glenn Greenwald) Uncommon Dissent The Uncredible Hallq Under the Mosquito Net Unfogged Unqualified Offerings Unscrewing The…

remember: biology's messy, chemistry stinks, and physics never works.

Nine out of ten chemists agree, too. (The tenth's anosmic).

By theophylact (not verified) on 27 Apr 2006 #permalink

Nine out of ten chemists agree, too. (The tenth's anosmic).

He doesn't count. He died when he didn't notice the fume hood wasn't working.

I wonder how msny chemists, though, have a dulled sense of smell. There may be soem selection effect - at least for organic chemists.

In Uncle Tungsten Oliver Sacks details his youthful experiments with classes of chemicals he collectively called "stinkogens."

By justawriter (not verified) on 27 Apr 2006 #permalink

Oh, please. Chemists are not responsible for the smells - they are only responsible for the identification of the compounds that make the smells. Biological processes produced most of these smells in the first place. Blaming chemists for horrible fragrances is like blaming PZ for his reporting of the fetid aroma of ID.

If you really want to smell something unique, cut open a specimen of Ascidia ceratodes, a tunicate, and drain the blood. You will never forget that smell. You will also have on your hands, or whereever, a puddle of vanadium enriched cells that are unique in the biological world. They also attract chemists like me...

jb: Vanadium? That's cool. I had heard that there is some evidence that we make use of extremely small amounts of it, but never that there was any creature that used in large quantities ...

As for responsibility for smells, well, where in nature do you find large amounts of hydrogen telluride? I understand it is absolutely horrible.

Rick @ shrimp and grits: Even as late as well into the 19th century, chemists sometimes used their own sense of taste to help identify stuff. Since we know that what we take to be the sense of taste relies a lot on the sense of smell, it is probably correct historically to say that smell was somewhat important to chemistry.

Keith - these guys concentrate vanadium by a factor of 10^6 (a millionfold) from seawater. It's still not clear why they do this, but PZ would tell you that it must have an evodevo advantage. My thesis focused on *how* they do this.

And I knew chemists when I was in college (Berkeley) in the 60's who not only smelled things, but tasted them. And just last week I watched one of my compatriots smear something onto his finger and then dip it into solvent to see if it was soluble. The compound, not the finger. This is why I got out of organic chemistry......