I gave a Nelson laugh to England a while back, for the creationist theme park that was going to be built there. I may have to take it back. It looks like the backers are a gang of confused prevaricators with no concrete plans, just a lot of wishful thinking on their part.
I propose that they crawl into their churches and pray real hard. That's probably as viable a business plan as what they've got right now.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
ON STRIKE!
It's come to this. We've been facing a steady erosion of talent here at Scienceblogs, with the loss of good people like Carl Zimmer and Ed Yong a while back, and with the very abrupt departure of 15 bloggers after the recent PepsiCo debacle — an event that damaged the reputation of this…
Aww, poor Intelligent Design creationism is feeling unloved. Or perhaps it's jealousy. David Klinghoffer, that clueless ideologue at the Discovery Institute, is whimpering that blogging scientists aren't paying enough attention to his brand of creationism.
Darwinian scientists who blog -- in other…
Paul Nelson responds to Amanda Marcotte, who mentioned that the poor quality of his debate explains why Nelson thinks ID should not be taught in schools.
Amanda, Sahotra and I spent three hours talking at an Austin bar the night before the debate. I reiterated to him what I've said for years: I'm…
Note: I originally planned to post this along with the Friday Fractal. Then, like chaos, fractals, and life, it didn't turn out the way I expected. Considering the length and tone of this piece, it will stand better alone. Never fear, the fractal is still on the way.
"They paved paradise, and put…
Ouch...
Although with the way the dollar's going, that will soon be enough to build a museum in (say) Texas to rival AiG's.
Bob
There is a name for these types of scams. Affinity group scams.
They can be enormously profitable. Look at Ted Haggard, Benny Hill, or the DI.
All you need is a group of gullible, not well educated, people who are conditioned to give money whenever they hear, "For Jesus."
SLC used to be the fraud center of the USA. A lot of Mormons, fake and real, preying on other Mormons. Until the US Department of Justice opened a few offices and started cracking down. Then they all moved to Nevada and Florida.
Benny Hill?
Don
Freudian slip I'm sure.
OK, Hinn, not Hill. It is not like I spend a lot of time keeping my list of very rich, Xian scammers up to date. So many frauds, so little time.
Star Wars message boards?
:)
It's okay, Raven. I think we all knew who you were talking about. Plus, it's easy to get them confused. I mean, Benny Hill slapped people on the head, and Benny Hinn slaps people on the head.
Pastor Benny Hill? Wasn't he the one who got caught chasing scantily clad parishioners around the altar?
Yes, while beating a frail old man about the head and ears.
"So many frauds, so little time"
Ah, then it was a Fraudian slip instead. :)
In the annals of financial matters, I can't think of anything worse than such a sham, except, of course, actually building a travesty like that one.
If only Ham were more intent on pocketing the monies coming in, and less interested in spreading lies. The desire to "save the souls" of others is a greater threat to humans than is mere thievery.
Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/2kxyc7
*Yakkety Sax starts playing in stogoe's mind*
Heh heh, mule.
That could be any pastor...
Funniest posts I've read in a while. Thanks! Actually, I wouldn't mind them listening to the Rev. Benny Hill...
Good to have that confirmed - it's exactly what all the British people were saying in the comments then :-)
Read also the linked post, where she provides a useful linked summary of the work done here in comments to discover the facts.
Pastor Benny Hill? Wasn't he the one who got caught chasing scantily clad parishioners around the altar?
some of us remember...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNUb-m9hwxA
In the '90s here in Washington State, there was a group that said they were going to build a Bible (creationist?) theme park. One of the main attractions was to be a giant simulator ride on Noah's Ark. The group managed to get local TV news coverage at the time, although I can't find anything on it now on the 'net. Needless to say their park didn't pan out either. How many of these projects get announced around the world?
Ah yes, Benny Hinn. I think that this video of him is much more funny than anything Benny Hill ever put out but I have no idea why. Maybe it's because of it having so much concentrated stupid for Jesus, maybe not.
Yay! Someone I know has been mentioned on Pharyngula. (or rather their blog has)
As Paul Crowley mentioned (comment 16, above), I'm very grateful to the commenters here for doing a lot of the legwork required to uncover the fact that the AH Trust is devoid of clothing.
Actually, I think the accounts claim that the organisation has £310,000 in the bank. Which is still not that much, but it's enough to make a website or two (although the quality of that site lends credence to the £310 theory).
Oddly, the group claims to be a reconvening of one which 'smuggled the Bible into Soviet Russia in 1974 on a floppy disk', a quite bizarre claim (how many floppy disk drives were there in Russia back then?)...
Looking at the annual report again, I see nothing that indicates that the sums are multiples of £1000. I do note that I was wrong about the £310 in the bank ("and in hand") -- it's actually £311.
There's another article about it here from the Observer's website - about the difficulty of actually finding any council willing to grant planning permission for it.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2228201,00.html
I particularly like the closing whine from one of the park's backers about Wigan Council's reaction to the project:
The theme park's anti-evolution bias and its emphasis on Genesis has raised eyebrows among planning officials, according to Jones, who originally wanted to build the park at the site of an old B&Q store but was refused permission by the council.
'Wigan council slammed the door in our faces. You mention the C [Christian] word, and people don't want to know,' Jones said.
Looking at the annual report again, I see nothing that indicates that the sums are multiples of £1000. I do note that I was wrong about the £310 in the bank ("and in hand") -- it's actually £311.