Now you can listen

Pharyngula commenter SteadyEddy has uploaded his audio recording of the Rue-Myers discussion. It's about 22M, so I'm still downloading it…but there it is. Thanks to SteadyEddy!

More like this

Greg Laden has provided som lengthy commentary on the Rue-Myers debate. They really didn't have to taser him. Just waving the weapon at him was enough to quiet him down.
Got a myspace page? Then you want to be friends with Prof. Steve Steve. OK, as several have noticed, there is actually a Pharyngula myspace. It's there as a placeholder, little more, and I'm not planning to do anything with it…but if anyone wants to be my friend, I'm easy. Will it worsen or improve…
I haven't always had as much concern about copyright infringement as I do now, but I've always considered it to be a given that copyright infringement involves taking something that doesn't belong to you without paying the owner. Taking something that doesn't belong to you without paying the owner…
While Sheril continues to blog up a storm, I merely have a few updates between my various plane flights....the latest of which, today, takes me to Minnesota for the big debate (tomorrow night) between Mooney-Nisbet and Laden-Myers. More on that when I get a second, but first, some updates: The…

It appears to be incomplete and quality is not very good :(

Any chance for full talk or transcript?

By Alex Besogonov (not verified) on 09 Feb 2008 #permalink

Both speakers continue the tradition of the same mistake made so often by both believers and secularists, which is that religion "causes" things such as morality or (as suggested by Rue) art. Religion does not cause morality or art. Humans have both an innate moral sense and an innate esthetic impulse. Both will appear in a culture regardless of the ideological context of the group of people. Morality and art will be expressed in religious terms when they occur in a religious context, but they are not caused by religion. Certainly some religious groups have crude and antiquated moral systems. But that is due to the unsophisticated way the people think, not to their religion. I am very liberal and an atheist, but there are many theistic people who have moral values equivalent to mine.

By Tim Tesar (not verified) on 09 Feb 2008 #permalink

SOMEONE PLEASE VOLUNTEER TO STEADYEDDY AND HELP FIX THE AUDIO QUALITY AND COMPRESSION!

I'm sure here are some people who could do it.

The file that's now available for download is 8000hz wav file so whoever volunteers would be better off with the original audio file.

Well, this is what I get for commenting before I finish listening to the discussion. Later on, Rue does mention his interest in the sociobiology of morality. And one of the commenters makes this point also. And I appreciate that PZ acknowledges the tendency of our minds to anthropomorphize.

I disagree with the strong claim of the anthropologist questioner that morality is a totally social construct. This kind of claim is not unusual in anthropology, but not universally accepted by others, such as some psychologists, particularly evolutionary psychologists.

On the other hand, I criticize the so-called "new atheists" because they seem to have focused so much on their science education that they overlooked psychology, sociology, history, anthropology. Sure, theistic beliefs are silly from the point of view of modern knowledge, but we should also ask ourselves about and appreciate the processes and history that led to people having the beliefs they have.

By Tim Tesar (not verified) on 09 Feb 2008 #permalink

Tim @ #2 You make a realistic point of theistic people
having moral values equivalent to yours. That is the
point that I have been deigning to put across for some time. If both people have equivalent moral values, and
the atheist has no need of religion, then why does the
religionist feel the need for the unnecessary baggage of
religion, knowing that your morals are equivalent to his?
Which in a sense cancels out religion's constant tenet
that morals are not inherent in the godless. I have no
doubt who is the more stable individual, and yet the
religionists cannot reason otherwise. It is just a matter
of religion clouding a clear concept and yet feeling
superior to the atheist who has no need for that totally
unnecessary and useless crutch.

Ugh, the recording quality and style makes me want to punch infants. I wish i knew where all this was going down so i could get stereo CD quality recordings for archival purposes. Anyone want to pay my airfare? I'm a professional Sound Engineer! :-D

Yeah, I know it's not very good quality. I did it on a whim on my Sandisk Sansa m250 mp3 player. This little gadget is a cheap ipod knockoff with AM/FM and a voice recording feature... more for making vocal notes, probably not meant to record dialoge within a big room. I didn't even think about recording it until a few minutes into the talk. I figured something was better than nothing- so I uploaded it. If you can't stand a crappy recording, don't take the time to download it. It's about 95 minutes long. I uploaded the original on PZ's link... so that's as good as mine gets. I think the Campus Atheists and Secular Humanist (CASH) folks (who sponsored the talk) recorded it an will be posting it on their website (maybe, sometime).

By SteadyEddy (not verified) on 09 Feb 2008 #permalink

your bookmark isnt working.

By the_Astrocreep (not verified) on 09 Feb 2008 #permalink

Thanks, SteadyEddy. It's listenable and far better than no recording at all.

By Grammar RWA (not verified) on 09 Feb 2008 #permalink

For those who are struggling with this I recommend altering the graphic equalizer, as well as using a set of head phones, if possible.

I always use head phones to watch movies, play video games, and listen to debates on the computer.

Call of Duty is simply stunning when your ears are focused solely on the bullets flying past your head!

How the hell does one download the file? I see no hotlink.