Oh, joy! Carl Zimmer has published a profile of Roger Hanlon, the well-known cephalopod expert, and he is specifically discussing the work on camouflage that I previously summarized. I've also cited his work on sexual mimicry and nuptial dances — this is a fellow whose work all true worshipers of the cephalopod should be following.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
If you've ever seen this TED talk with "jaw-dropping footage" of a cuttlefish, octopus, and other sea creatures, then you should definitely check out fellow ScienceBlogger Carl Zimmer's article on cuttlefish camouflage in today's New York Times. Zimmer visits scientists at Woods Hole, MA and…
Eric Hovind is continuing his father's tradition of utterly inane arguments against evolution. In this case, it's a video of Hovind and two of his bland buddies sitting around talking about…cephalopods. Oh, it is painful to witness.
They show excerpts of some perfectly lovely videos of cuttlefish…
For years, fellow scienceblogger PZ Myers has taught us all well why we ought to adore squid, octopuses, and other cephalopods. But I came to a new degree of appreciation when I traveled up to Woods Hole to spend some time with the biologist Roger Hanlon. Hanlon studies how cephalopods disguise…
Yesterday's [21 November 2005] post about squid had a most unsatisfying conclusion, so I feel compelled to mention two things: squidblog has a brief explanation of squid jet propulsion, and I've dug up another older paper on squid movement. Even better, it's about squid nuptial dances and mating.…
Here's the YouTube video on him too:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2x-8v1mxpR0
Direct link to the Zimmer-Hanlon interview video (76MB):
http://downloads.feedroom.com/podcasts/nytimes/20080213/IPOD_2581_a1_wg…
Tentacular!
Blasphemy! I came to this website for atheistic musings! Now we have actual science?!!?! I am going to have to active corners of my brain I have not used in months. (Not sure if previous comment was meant to be sarcastic or grateful)
I have seen cuttlefish (no, not that Cuttlefish) doing nuptial dances in the wild and in the process flashing all colors of the rainbow. Reading that these masters of color are actually color blind is truly mind blowing. As someone who has dabbled in black and white photography and computer graphics I'm aware that high resolution finely graded shades of grey can convey extremley nuanced surface information. However I can't quite imagine how a truly color blind creature can so perfectly blend in with colored backgrounds. Is there a theory as to what is going on here?
Here's the video to link to, if possible.
A thought:
Although cuttlefish (no, not Cuttlefish) are colorblind, there is evidence that they can detect, and flash in, polarized light.
And while this may not explain the flashing of color, on the other hand it might.
When humans study cuttlefish (no, not Cuttlefish), they do so with the biases inherent in possessing trichromatic eyes.
So it is no surprise,
That humans see a color deficit instead of a polarization plus
When comparing "them" to "us".
It could be that color is an artifact, and not what the cuttlefish (not, not Cuttlefish) perceives at all;
He just sees a lady cuttlefish and answer's nature's call.
Of course, this Cuttlefish (no, not cuttlefish) is not an expert, so everything I am saying about cephalopod communication and the beautiful danse nuptial
Is merely concuptial.
DC
Excellent article, well suited -- and as for the poetry by DC in #6 -- very well done!
It seems that I must reassess the way I thought of Color.
For being trichromatic I thought polarized light duller.
But now that my perception has so greatly been enhanced.
I've a greater admiration for how a cuttlefish's romanced.