Here's our problem

I know, you can't use reason to talk someone out of a position they didn't use reason to arrive at, anyway. But this result at least tells us the depth of the problem.

When asked what they would do if scientists were to disprove a particular religious belief, nearly two-thirds (64%) of people say they would continue to hold to what their religion teaches rather than accept the contrary scientific finding, according to the results of an October 2006 Time magazine poll.

I've talked to a lot of people who think that way, and the really mind-boggling part of this is that they consider this attitude to be a virtue. That's where early education in critical thinking is important: children shouldn't grow up believing that stubbornly clinging to an idea despite all the evidence against it makes them look heroic. It makes them look stupid.

More like this

Out of Finland, comes a video so mind-bogglingly, surrealistically bad that it's oddly entertaining. I couldn't help but watch it with utter fascination at the amount of effort that must have gone into something so strange.
A fine, although minor, example of wikisuicide comes from discourseur. Be sure to check the talk page and contributions if interested in the details.
How's this for jaw dropping, mind-boggling, unintentional irony? Question to the Bush administration at this year's UN climate change talks: