Hairy horde marches on

I just stagger back from yet another long day of travel, and what do I discover? You've filled up the las entry in the endless thread again. Does the horde never sleep?

Anyway, we will launch this one with a mystery. Watch this video of an Oregon bigfoot:

Now the mystery. Why is it that all sightings of bigfoot are such obvious scams? They are typically badly done messes like a poor and shaky camera recording, or a pile of rotting meat in a fur suit. This one suffers from overly slick choreography — isn't it nice how the camera zooms into focus only briefly, just as Bigfoot turns to look at the cameraman? At least this guy invested in a nice hairy man suit and put some effort into the makeup, but it's still a guy in a costume.

And wait — the creator's name is "John E. Walker"? Yeah, right.

As if you need anything to talk about, at least you can start by ripping into this video. I have no idea where you'll end up from there, of course.

More like this

A conversation yesterday as we were running home to get the elder Free-Ride offspring ready for a soccer practice: Dr. Free-Ride: Do you want to change out of your "picture day" clothes before practice? Elder offspring: Nah, I'm good. I'll just change into shin guards, soccer socks, and cleats. Dr…
It's that time of year again when people start thinking about Halloween costumes-- SteelyKid is apparently planning to re-use her Peter Pan outfit from last year-- and the conceptual costumes post from a while back has proved enduringly popular at this time of year. If you're not into conceptual…
Bravo! A blog about language gets, as you might expect, a few fairly repetitive responses to common issues, and Language Log gets lots of unimaginative comments about ending a sentence with a preposition…and they've reached the limits of their patience. Unable to bear any longer the tedious work of…
Since half the blogs on the net seem to be making lists of their favorite movie quotes, I thought I'd add some of mine. Some movies are just goldmines of great lines - Caddyshack, almost any Kevin Smith movie, Bull Durham. Herewith some of my absolute favorites, without the title of the movie so…

in California, where anything that isn't perfect beach-weather is considered a catastrophe of biblical proportions, and every rain-cloud is subject to 24/7 "storm-watch" coverage on the news

As a recent transplant from New England to California (SF Bay area), this amuses me to no end. These people have no idea what bad weather is.

Even tho they missed the reference, Mr T's response @416, to Owlmirror's #416 was awesome in it's own right.

Oh yeah, when I rewrote that comment from scratch (vox.com signed me out), I forgot to add the following to the end again:

Allons, enfants de la pa-triii-i-euh,
le jour de boire est arrivé!
[...]
Aux verres, citoyens,
buvons nos flacons,
buvons, buvons, qu'un vin bien pur
a-breeeeeu-veuh nos poumons !!!

causing you to slip every two seconds while walking

You need some training. Expect to slip. Start to slide deliberately. I never slip when I expect the ground to be unpredictable, and sliding along can be great fun!

so I think I'll send an e-mail.

Done.

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

As a recent transplant from New England to California (SF Bay area), this amuses me to no end. These people have no idea what bad weather is.

Come to SoCal, live in our heat during the summer. It's pretty bad, lol. (Not nearly as bad or dry as some places, still I rather that my AC isn't on.)

By Gyeong Hwa Pak… (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Heathen! infidel!

... Speak it. We must find this (spits vehemently) accursed pikachu and make them see the error of their ways!!!

(... counts exclamation marks, concludes that, clearly, there just aren't enough up there yet...)

!!!!!!

(/...in other news, in five days I will be in Whistler. My legs are getting all restless already. If anyone needs me, I'll be in the basement, standing on my board, with my hands over my tips and my eyes closed.)

followed by a bunch of student screaming and the other student[s?] giggling.

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

So your university is in it-never-rains-in-southern-California?

arrivé!

arrivé !

Mère. Deux.

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Steve Benson gets in trouble for making fun of Pat Robertson. See cartoon at http://comics.com/steve_benson/2010-01-17/

[Steve Benson writes,] Got this stern reprimand from an individual who obviously missed or is ignoring Robertson's goofy assertion that God punished Haiti with an earthquake because they chose to join Satan's team as long as Satan would help them throw off French colonial rule:
     "Steve: God will have the last word for those who mock his anointed. Operation Blessing was the first functional relief organization on the ground in Haiti following the earth quake...not the U.N. or The Salvation Army nor The Red Cross. Furthermore you are ignorant of Haiti's historical spiritual strongholds as a Nation."
_____
My reply: "So, when Pat Robertson on the 700 Club last week declared that God had hit Haiti with a killer earthquake because 200 years ago the Haitians made a pact with the Devil to follow him if he would rid them of French colonial rule, Robertson was really saying that God killed thousands of Haitians under earthquake rubble because of 'Haiti's historical spiritual strongholds as a Nation’?
_____
Roberton's water carrier responded: "Steve: Your theology is backward. God saves & is moving through His people to rescue Haitians. Satan comes to kill, steal & destroy those who worship the devil. If you think that is funny you need a reality check Bro."
_____
My answer: "Yeah, right. Tell that to Robertson, who claimed that God punished Haiti with an earthquake because of their devil worship. He didn’t say anything about Satan creating the quake:
     "'Pat Robertson Says Haiti Paying for 'Pact to the Devil,' CNN, 13 January 2010, at: http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/01/13/haiti.pat.robertson/index.html ; to view the video of Robertson's claim of a fulfilled prophecy, see: 'Robertson's "true story": Haiti "swore a pact to the devil" to get "free from the French" and "ever since, they have been cursed,"' broadcast from Christian Broadcasting Network's 'The 700 Club,' 13 January 2010, at: http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201001130024)"

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

(/...in other news, in five days I will be in Whistler.

oh, fun! I've been there once, with a friend from Vancouver. Snow and weather were shitty then, but it was still a cool weekend.

By Jadehawk, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Lynna@492,

Amazing! Thanks. Knot theory is one of the most fascinating branches of mathematics for an amateur - and contains many deep, unsolved problems. I have a popular book on the subject on my shelves. However it's not true, as the linked article says, that until now knot theory has been considered completely abstract. DNA strands can get knotted, and there are special enzymes, called topoisomerases, which knot and unknot it. In chemistry, synthesising knotted molecules is part of the study of isomers - different molecules made of the same combination of atoms. Knot theory also has deep connections with statistical mechanics.

On a lighter note, this reminds me of a British series of children's books about an eccentric scientist (oh well, at least not a mad or evil one) called Professor Branestawm. The Prof. wrote a letter to the Water Board (in the good old pre-Thatcher days, the UK had a municipally-owned water supply system), complaining that the water was coming out of his taps twisted. The Water Board wrote back saying they didn't mind that, but if it started coming out in knots, to please let them know!

By Knockgoats (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

I'd like to live somewhere one day that has mountains.

Blech. You can have the ones here. I'll never understand the appeal of camping in the mountains. I live in a part of the world that only has three or four snow-free months and the first thing people want to do is go as soon as the weather warms is find the only place in the province that still has snow, like Jasper or Banff, and set up a tent near a glacier?! I'll take Mai Tais and palm trees any day.

(/...in other news, in five days I will be in Whistler. My legs are getting all restless already. If anyone needs me, I'll be in the basement, standing on my board, with my hands over my tips and my eyes closed.)

This is exactly the sort of up-to-no-goodery I'm talking about, AJ.

Tying Light Into Knots

That's awesome. In the most tangential manner, that reminds me of this delightful puzzle game.

By Brownian, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Knockgoats @508:

However it's not true, as the linked article says, that until now knot theory has been considered completely abstract. DNA strands can get knotted, and there are special enzymes, called topoisomerases, which knot and unknot it. In chemistry, synthesising knotted molecules is part of the study of isomers - different molecules made of the same combination of atoms. Knot theory also has deep connections with statistical mechanics.

Ahhh. Excellent addition of info. I didn't know that. This is what I like about Pharyngula!

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

I've [link] been there once

:-) :-) :-)

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Oh, fun! I've been there once, with a friend from Vancouver.

I seriously can't wait. I've been training on my local regular hill almost nightly, and doing cardio stuff and strength stuff at home in faint hopes of being halfway ready for that kind of drop and that much powder, and everyone I mention it to is warning me after this mountain, I will be forever spoiled for the East coast.

This is exactly the sort of up-to-no-goodery I'm talking about, AJ...

Yeah, I realize... But I figure to make me pay now, the sick-of-winter lynch mob is gonna have to come into the mountains to get me. I figure I'm safe for a bit, anyway...

(/Granted, they'll probably be waiting at the airport when I get back with a noose, too... But by then, fuck, who cares. I'll die happy.)

Is the LDS Church trying to buy a controlling interest in the Salt Lake Tribune? Jeeezus christ, I hope not. Sometimes the Salt Lake Tribune reporters are the only force keeping the LDS Church honest when it comes to Utah politics.
http://www.cityweekly.net/utah/blog-2955-lds-church-vs-city-weekly.html

Doesn't sound good though. The Tribune is bleeding money and the church has money. Shades of Rev. Moon buying the Washington Times.

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Already got a reply! Information on the digs should start to become available in March.

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

I'll take Mai Tais and palm trees any day.

See, I'm not agin' that, either, exactly... With enough iced drinks, no particular need to move through the air, and plenty of sufficiently cool water to swim in and/or sail on, even I can stand summer. Briefly, anyway.

But too much of the reality of summer for me is nothing like that. It mostly seems to be about stinking, overheated, humid cities, trying and failing to breathe ground level ozone and worse, and this awful sense of intellectual torpor. Seriously, I feel like I lose 20 points off the top of my IQ in the months around the summer solstice... Sometime ago, I came to the conclusion my body's cooling systems completely suck, and my CNS starts going on the fritz even when mildly overheated... I've always figured it's probably some nasty side effect of having spent the first three years of my life somewhere around 60 degrees North.

(/So summer's label sez, for me: Warning, take only with ice-cold beer and/or margaritas.)

(/Granted, they'll probably be waiting at the airport when I get back with a noose, too... But by then, fuck, who cares. I'll die happy.)

Not without snow tires I won't. You're safe...for now.

(Okay, so the roads are fine. I'd still rather be rollin' with my windows down.)

By Brownian, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

On a lighter note, this reminds me of a British series of children's books about an eccentric scientist (oh well, at least not a mad or evil one) called Professor Branestawm. The Prof. wrote a letter to the Water Board (in the good old pre-Thatcher days, the UK had a municipally-owned water supply system), complaining that the water was coming out of his taps twisted. The Water Board wrote back saying they didn't mind that, but if it started coming out in knots, to please let them know!

I remember those books! In primary school, I think I even dressed up as Professor Branestawm once (using a shower cap to create a high bald forehead, as I recall) for a "come dressed as your favourite book character" day.

I'm not going to rise to the bait about the Glorious People's Commissariat of Water Supply, of course...

Of course, now water is privatised, you get to choose whether it twists or not - and if it does, which way - as it comes out of the tap ;-0

By Knockgoats (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Of course, now water is privatised, you get to choose whether it twists or not - and if it does, which way - as it comes out of the tap ;-0

Unlike the good old days of socialised water, when government inspectors made sure everyone's water twisted to the left, like good socialist water. If you were suspected of twisting your water to the right, you'd be up before the Communist Fascist Death Panel before Sarah Palin could say "You betcha!"

(I'm not quite sure whether I'm making fun of socialists or conservatives here, or both. Bah. A plague on both their houses.)

Weather? We are burining valuable Threadwidth talking about weather?

Now, water supply: fascinating history there, of engineering breakthroughs and grand schemes. Cadillac Desert, fossil aquifers, all that shit.

I have been learning about the old Brooklyn Water Works. Brookyn, in the years before it became a borough of NYC and back when it was the third largest city in North America, used to get its water via an amazing system of reservoirs, giant conduits, and steam-powered pumps from further east on Long Island (including the "lake " across the street from which i live).

By Sven DiMilo (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

burining

to burin: chatting listlessly and aimlessly about random, trivial subjects.

By Sven DiMilo (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Wait - I thought Knot theory was a hotly contested subject only amongst knitters.

By Patricia, Quee… (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Here's a good read!

By Sven DiMilo (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Already got a reply! Information on the digs should start to become available in March.

:-)

I should be able to hold off on buying the tickets until then. That makes me happier.

By Jadehawk, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Why knit?
.
.
.
.
.
.
Why knot?

Nighty-night!

By Knockgoats (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Gyeong Hwa Pak (#487)

You don't like watching people freak out due to a little thunder and lightning?

The thunder in Seattle sometimes sounds like buildings exploding and then collapsing. That's freaked me out a few times before I realized it was only one of our rare storms.

So did David from Canada ever return, or did he end up being eaten as well?

The thunder in Seattle sometimes sounds like buildings exploding and then collapsing. That's freaked me out a few times before I realized it was only one of our rare storms.

yeah, thunderstorms sound like that over here, too. And they look Epic, as well, because you can have a single lightning-bolt go across the entire sky; which is HUGE here in the prairie.

By Jadehawk, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Day, David fC is one of a few who've appeared honestly inquisitive, asked questions, were directed to a wealth of resources, and never returned.

Make of that what you will...

By John Morales (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

And...SHHHHHIIIIIIIIT

Coakley concedes the Senate race to Scott Brown.

On that note, I just got a call from the RNC, laying out the case that the Republicans™ are BACK!! and would I please be willing to donate $100.00 in the fight to defeat Obama's policies??

I let the caller run on and on with his script, thinking the time he wasted with me would be time he wouldn't have to proselytize to an actual Repubtard. When he had finished his spiel, I calmly informed him "Well, I'm a "big L liberal democrat socialist Muslim fairy, so.......no."

Then I hung up.

The Astronomy Picture of the Day is interesting. It's a Martian landscape that looks surrealistic.

That pic appeared in the RSS feed for HiRISE some time ago. Probably 1 in 5 is comparably weird and beautiful - the rest a pretty too, but only moderately weird. One of the many I like.

Those are very beautiful pictures Lynna. I like the one with the rainbow over the field. I reminds me of the time I say a tripple rainbow.

By Gyeong Hwa Pak… (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Lynna, Leland is an artist with his photographs. Unfortunately, only the Redhead's work in on our walls.

By Nerd of Redhead, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Those are very beautiful pictures Lynna. I like the one with the rainbow over the field. I reminds me of the time I say a tripple rainbow.

If you see a triple anything in nature isn't that supposed to instantly convert you to a brand of christianity that worships the dogma of the Trinity? :-)

Reflector of the Light of God

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Dang, those typo cooties. ...work ins on our walls.

By Nerd of Redhead, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Growing up in Alaska, double rainbows, circular rainbows, and rainbows in the middle of the night were not all that uncommon (although still very cool). I don't think I've ever seen a triple, though.

If you see a triple anything in nature isn't that supposed to instantly convert you to a brand of christianity that worships the dogma of the Trinity? :-)
Reflector of the Light of God

I suppose so. But since they were rainbows I suspect they want me in Valhalla. Or join a gay church. lol.

By Gyeong Hwa Pak… (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

@Sven and David M.: Thanks for the archosaur metabolism/palaeo xrefs.

Possibly relevant regarding knots:

http://fold.it

By Owlmirror (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

I remember seeing lots of "sun dogs" in Alaska. The most spectacular sky display, though, was the northern lights.

Hmmm. As far as joining a gay church, if you see a triple rainbow, don't you have to join a triple-gay church? I like the idea of a triple-gay church.

Change of subject warning: Here's a Moment of Mormon Madness. Or rather, years and years of madness. The information is from an anonymous poster on exmormon.org

I too was a Sex-offender therapist in Utah.
     After reading through that thread started by Changed Man, it triggered a thought. I remember when working with sex-offenders and their parole officers in half-way houses, being shocked at what they were being asked to do as part of getting out of the half-way house. They were supposed to be getting a support network around them, for their eventual transition into society. Guess what one of the things they were supposed to be doing if they were LDS? Going to singles dances!
     They would have to report on their employment searches, and support networks. If they were LDS, and hadn't thought of singles dances on their own, it was usually suggested to them by one of the law enforcement staff.
     At the time I thought, holy shit, these mormon women have no idea that there is a meeting taking place where a rapist/molester etc. is being told that he should come to your dance to meet you! It wasn't an isolated incident, it happened over and over. Sending the offenders to LDS singles dances was just part of the routine of getting back into the community.
     One situation that stood out was a 50 year old single man that was gay. He also was mentally retarded. He was very effeminate and child like and had been sort of adopted by the older members of his ward. ...
     He was known for his bizzare sexual habits(he would often steal nylon coats from the local schools,throw them in a pile,strip naked,fall on the coats and masturbate).One day he had oral sex with one of the boys in town. The kid was not LDS and so the ward blamed the boy. He "made it up". The problem with this was that the guy admitted to it. He admitted to having sex at rest stops with guys he didn't know. He admitted to his coat fetish. NO ONE in the church would believe him. They thought he was joking.
     Anyways,he was convicted and placed into a mentally handicapped program. The church members did try to keep him away from kids "so he wouldn'tbe falsely accused again". ... a friend of mine who was the membership clerk saw his record. He said that he was a member in good standing.
By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

He was convicted of statutory rape, forcible rape, or being gay and handicapped?

'Tis Himself, OM | January 19, 2010 9:28 PM:

Waterspout over Tampa Bay.

Your link does not work unless I forge the referer to http://www.caedes.net/
Otherwise it takes me to an image which threatens that chihuahuas are comming to get me for stealing images.
Here's another waterspout. (From here .)
And another.

Miki Z @546: Sorry, I don't know what the conviction was. I assume statutory rape. I went back to the original post to see if there was more info on the handicapped gay guy, but no.

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

#282

David (Also Sven, but I've lost his comment on the Yowie (I do things like that)),

There are reports of finding sasquatch hair and feces. I haven't been able to check them out, and while there are reports on DNA testing etc., write ups in the scientific literature aren't there as far as I can find.

The stories have it that the hair and fecal samples contain genetic material that is not human, not even bear. What it is, according to the tales, is primate, but not any species currently known.

On a related note there was a report our of Calgary, Alberta Canada wherein a pair of young men out in a rural area heard a noise late at night. It being over cast, and them out in the boonies, the night was very dark, and our investigators forgot to take a light. So there they were, flailing about unable to see anything clearly.

They saw something large, got excited, and decided it had to be a sasquatch. But they weren't able to catch it, though they did manage to get a few, short hairs.

The hairs they managed to get a local professor to test. According to the test our intrepid souls had discovered, the bison. Last I heard they still insist they had seen a sasquatch.

As for the yowie, which Sven asked about, let us start with the Wallace line. A line between two faunas; the South East Asian to the west, and the Australian to the east. In the one you have primates. In the other you have tree kangaroos.

There are a few animals shared between the two faunas. Birds for example, and bats (I think). Also humans, dogs, and some rodents. These last animals that could reach Australia from South-East Asia via boats, or by hitching a ride from those with the tech.

But what about yowies? How did they get to Australia, when they had no boats, and apparently never hitched a ride with the humans. And keep in mind that Australia broke off from Africa a long time before apes evolved.

The yowie, from what I can tell, is that the yowie is an example of Aussie humor, only that.

By mythusmage (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

289,

BDC

Creationists are offering evidence now?

By mythusmage (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

mythicalmage:

There are reports of finding sasquatch hair and feces. I haven't been able to check them out, and while there are reports on DNA testing etc., write ups in the scientific literature aren't there as far as I can find.

The stories have it that the hair and fecal samples contain genetic material that is not human, not even bear. What it is, according to the tales, is primate, but not any species currently known.

'Nuff said. Please?

By boygenius (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Friggin' blockquote fail!!! 'Nuff said. Please? is me, obviously. Also, emphasis mine. Duh.

By boygenius (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

#436

Rohrsharch,

Never ascribe to bi-polar disorder what can adequately be explained by Aspergers.

By mythusmage (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

mm,

The yowie, from what I can tell, is that the yowie is an example of Aussie humor, only that.

Is it that they're all scams, or because you need them to be scams?
Why the need to deny Yowie? Were you ordered to? Is it because you disagreed with His message of peace and love in favor of violent revolution? Did you deny Him three times before the cock crowed?

--

PS Ctrl-F is your friend, and the post you've lost is #445.

PPS Similar alleged creatures outside of North America.

By John Morales (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

#555

Boygenius,

What strange compulsion forces you to read me?

And since I'm writing...

On David Marjanovic's Macintosh

Are you barred from upgrading the OS on your Mac? If not then I recommend getting a copy of either Leopard or Snow Leopard.

On the Orang Pendak

The first thing to note here is that the orang pendak is taken more seriously than other cyptid apes. Something to do with the relative lack of fakes and hoaxes where evidence is concerned, and the relative lack of a hostile reaction from scientist (might be because assholes and jerks haven't produced all that much in the way of fakes related to it).

Then again, the orang utan turns out to be more bipedal than any other great ape with the exception of humans. Forget where, but I think in National Geographic there is an article on the animal that points that out.

So the orang pendak may be a subspecies of orang utan, or even just a population of one of the two established subspecies. Considering how long the species has been around, and the varied territory it lives in, it would seem there's been some evolving going on.

By mythusmage (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

I love it when drudgereport.com doesn't try to influence politics. They're just so fair and balanced over there.

Current headline:

"NOW... WILL HE RUN FOR PRESIDENT?"

They report, you decide!

By 386sx for a hu… (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

#555

John Morales,

Where's the evidence? Did they take the ferry from Jakarta?

And why are you blathering on about this when people have asked you to stop? I swear, you show all the signs of being bi-circular. I mean, when are you going to provide proof that Vishnu sleeps at the very center of reality, and all of reality is but the product of his dreaming? That is, after all, really what you're talking about, isn't it?

I mean, why should we take seriously anybody who believes in some cosmic vatch with an esoteric taste in halleucinogenics?

(Yowies = Vishnu, a simple equation!)

(Vatch: cf The Witches of Karres)

By mythusmage (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

mythicalmagic:

Boygenius,

What strange compulsion forces you to read me?

Have you ever witnessed a train wreck? Were you able to look away?

That said, can anyone tutor me on how to create a killfile. Can I do it through Movable Type? I'm admittedly clueless on this subject.

By boygenius (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

@ mythusmage

Sooooo, have you found me a quote or two of people saying anything like "the lack of evidence means we can't go looking" or are you ready to admit you've imagined this anti-sasquatch prejudice we're supposed to be feeling? This should be so easy; you don't have to step outside the blog. How do you hope to change our minds on the beastie itself if you can't even produce a single quote to show us we're being tripped up by our "inner creationist"?

On the other hand, here are your own words: "[T]oo many people have an emotional investment in sasquatch being a lie. ... You have become afraid to admit to error, you and many more besides."

Which I originally compared to those of an actual creationist and can now compare to the words of a paranoid lunatic confused about science over on Respectful Insolence: "It boils down to this - if you entertain the thought that vaccines are bad and I've been grossly lied to about the benefits and risks then it EXPLODES the world you believe in. And most people don't want to go there."

See the theme here? Doesn't it worry you?

Now get to work. Show us what we've said that makes you think we're sasquatch deniers too invested in our sasquatch-free worldview to confront the "evidence" with the proper level of reverence. Slaughter us with our own words. If you can't, then admit you made a mistake, shut the fuck up, and try to learn enough about science and skepticism that you stop sounding like a creationist or a vaccine denying conspiracy theorist.

Peer-reviewed Research Shows Richard Dawkins Can Change Minds.

Azim F. Shariff, Adam B. Cohen, and Ara Norenzayan have recently published a paper, The Devil’s Advocate: Secular Arguments Diminish both Implicit and Explicit Religious Belief . ( Journal of Cognition and Culture 8 (2008) 417–423 )

I found it by way of the most recent Reasonable Doubts podcast. (Starting at about 16:20 .)

Anyone who reads pharyngula long enough will encounter a story from regular commenter about how their mind was changed by a "strident" atheist, such as Bertrand Russell, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennet, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, or PZ Myers. A few of the atheists interviewed in D.J. Grothe's long running Point Of Inquiry podcast have told similar stories.

Yet many opponents of so-called "New Atheism", or "Militant Atheism" claim the arguments of Richard Dawkins will not change minds. And from there, the argument seems to devolve into a war of anecdotes.

But now there has been a scientific test - a limited, small-scale test, but a test nonetheless.

Abstract:

The religion-science debate has heated up in recent years, with polemical arguments on both side decrying the other. Given that the dominant view is of religiousness as a relatively fixed personality trait, all of this furor seems excessive. Interested in just how malleable religiousness is, we exposed half of our participants to an argument against the existence of God by Richard Dawkins. Those exposed to Dawkins’ arguments showed lower self-reported religiousness, as well as less implicit association between religion and truth. These results demonstrate the flexibility of trait religiousness.

Discussion:

The results strongly suggest that religious beliefs can be diminished, at both implicit and explicit levels, by arguments such as that of Professor Dawkins. Those reading the Dawkins passage were significantly less likely to endorse our religiosity items including statements such as "I consider myself a religious person" and "My personal religious beliefs are very important to me." Though the possibility of an effect was predicted, the degree to which explicit beliefs were reduced surprised us. Self- reported belief in God, for instance, dropped by more than a full point on a 5-point scale.

The Dawkins passage used appears to be The "know-nothings", the "know-alls", and the "no-contests", which appeared in The Nullifidian, December 1994 .

The authors do note some limitations, particularly:

It remains to be seen how long lasting the effects of arguments such as that of Professor Dawkins actually are. People's beliefs, both implicit and explicit, can be influenced by their immediate environments (Devine, 1989). The brief exposures that people from religious backgrounds have with secular arguments may be rapidly overwhelmed by more pervasive exposure to their religiously saturated communities. Nonetheless, the current results do demonstrate the effectiveness of pro-evolutionary, anti-religion arguments, as well as the existence of a certain fluidity in people's religious convictions.

It can often seem futile to argue with believers. But there is evidence minds can be changed by atheist arguments. Next time you find yourself wondering if anyone's mind will be changed by your arguing with a theist, come back, and read the paper I have written about. Do not give up hope. Minds can be changed.

It can often seem futile to argue with believers. But there is evidence minds can be changed by atheist arguments. Next time you find yourself wondering if anyone's mind will be changed by your arguing with a theist, come back, and read the paper I have written about. Do not give up hope. Minds can be changed.

Did you need a paper to tell you that? I'm the living proof; my de-conversion occurred while I've been commenting here, and I haven't been quiet about it.

Admittedly, it's not as simple as "Pharyngula changed my mind". I already had considerable doubts before I ever started commenting here, and was on a gradual road towards non-belief. But it certainly accelerated the process.

I would also add that I don't think it's particularly worthwhile, in and of itself, to "evangelise" for atheism. It is worthwhile to try and convert people to a pro-science worldview, and to campaign on important issues like gay rights, proper science teaching in schools, and secularism. But it isn't necessary for everyone to be an atheist in order to support these things. It's IMO far more worthwhile to try and persuade conservative/fundamentalist believers to convert to a more liberal and flexible form of religion, than to try and convert relatively moderate believers (as I used to be) to atheism. In the end, atheism isn't a religion; it's a simple state of not believing in any gods. And, self-evidently, the non-existent gods don't care whether people believe in them or not. What I care about is the actual effect of people's beliefs; and conservative/fundamentalist religion is a million times more harmful to the world than moderate religion.

Walton,

What I care about is the actual effect of people's beliefs; and conservative/fundamentalist religion is a million times more harmful to the world than moderate religion.

I think you're equivocating between someone's beliefs and their religion.

For me, the difference between what you refer to as "conservative/fundamentalist religion" and what you refer to as "moderate religion" is the degree of zealousness of an adherent, at least in regards to the Abrahamic religions.

By John Morales (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

"Study" had 106 participants, who were Uni students, so had some intelligence presumably, hardly representative of the general population.

Interesting, in a way, but not more then that.

I would also add that I don't think it's particularly worthwhile, in and of itself, to "evangelise" for atheism

Walton, stay away from the rwandan coffee, I don't think it agrees with you !
Who evangelises for atheism ? All people point out, here, or in the public sphere, is the shortcomings of religion, noone is running around yelling "join the non-stamp-collecting society" !

By Rorschach (not verified) on 19 Jan 2010 #permalink

Walton | January 20, 2010 5:19 AM:

Did you need a paper to tell you that? I'm the living proof; my de-conversion occurred while I've been commenting here, and I haven't been quiet about it.

I was thinking of stories like yours when I decided to post this. I certainly appreciate conversion stories, and I think there are plenty to be found on pharyngula and similar places. However, from a scientific standpoint, it is important to see the ideas implied by these stories tested under controlled conditions.
Additionally - comments claiming the minds of believers cannot be changed are sometimes made here, and I thought the paper in question provided a new way to argue against those claims. Narratives like yours probably appeal to more people, but research changes minds too, and I think it's important to apply multiple strategies.

Off-topic (!):

Why men use prostitutes. US readers need to bear in mind that political definitions differ in the UK and that far fewer UK people attend religious services overall (so you can't directly compare those sorts of things with your own experience but would instead need to see how they relate to the actual local population norms).

From the PDF, an interesting parallel:

Of the men studied, 44% reported that their first use of women in prostitution occurred when they were below the age of 21. ... between 50-75% of women entered prostitution before they were 18

It's a shame they don't have figures for the same ages of each. It looks as though youth is a big factor on both sides. It's far easier to trap females into prostitution when young (no options, poor self-image) and also somewhat easier to convince males it's an OK thing if they get inducted into that culture when young. But the males reported also easily adopting the habits of other males and other places where it's regarded as OK (and tended to down-play the significance of the fact that the women were coerced - and from how young an age that had been for most).

"Rorschach" | January 20, 2010 5:52 AM:

"Study" had 106 participants, who were Uni students, so had some intelligence presumably, hardly representative of the general population

That's why I referred to it as "a limited, small-scale test".
But your decision to put quotes around the word 'study' is irresponsible; it is real research, and the researchers are entirely honest about its limitations. You, on the other hand, try to imply it has no importance. That is a mistake on your part.

Additionally - comments claiming the minds of believers cannot be changed are sometimes made here, and I thought the paper in question provided a new way to argue against those claims.

Seems to me the claim that is more often made here is that the minds of a certain type of believers cannot be changed. Those whose delusions completely incapacitate them of the simplest form of critical reasoning and evidence based thought. That paper doesn't provide a way to argue against this claim.

By negentropyeater (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

llewelly,

What I am implying is that it has no statistical significance.

By Rorschach (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Seems to me the claim that is more often made here is that the minds of a certain type of believers cannot be changed.

Indeed, there's more an expectation of a huge pool of mediocrity, of moderate religionists, of cowardly potential atheists and other assorted fence-sitters who could conceivably be reached with sufficient remedial education and unremitting application of reason.

The problem being that, even though this mediocrity can individually be pinned down into acknowledging that they don't really believe much of their religion (and don't really know much about reality nor even about what they pretend to know about religion!), it's debatable whether they're worth having on side. They're liable to want to maintain their comfortable cover within society and to revert to their normal non-thinking habits - or even to be convinced of the reverse point of view the next moment they encounter another charismatic religiot.

It's hard to civilise their minds in the first place but also hard to get them to retain and maintain that level of civilisation (ie as active mental processes). The ones who were capable of it (ie sufficiently intellectually honest and brave) would already have obtained it for themselves.

Obviously it's important to try and stop the fundies claiming the mediocrity as their own; but the average dishonest, lazy, cowardly, unthinking human is not a great asset in its own right for the truth-seeking (ie atheism and science) side.

Think of them as pawns in a reverse Overton Window game:

If the large mass of mediocrity are generally held away from flocking with the religious nutters (both the dangerously insane and the criminally manipulative) and giving them protective cover, then those religious nutters can more properly be seen for the extremists and conmen that they are. So the big flock of sheeple will then be even more discouraged from hanging out with the rabid dogs and voracious wolves - despite the unlikelihood of the sheeple suddenly becoming sensible in their own right.

llewelly,

Thanks for that reference - interesting. However, I'd strongly criticise a couple of aspects:
1) The first four of the six questions of the self-report questionnaire assume that the subject is religious:
“My personal religious beliefs are very important
to me”,
“My religion or faith is an important part of my identity”,
“If someone
wanted to understand who I am as a person, my religion or faith would be
very important in that”,
“I believe strongly in the teachings of my religion or faith”
2) The r-values for correlation between self-report and implicit measures are quite low, and many statisticians would say r is not a robust measure anyway.

By Knockgoats (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

I would worry about the Hawthorne effect with the study as well. It's not unreasonable to suppose that if you have someone reading a passage which hints that they're a moron for being religious and then ask if they're religious, you may affect the answer more than the thinking. It's an interesting study, and I don't have any suggestions on how to improve it, but what it says is pretty narrow.

Third and forth order rainbow. Very rare.

Cool, but not rare at all. Problem is that to see them, you have to be looking right at the sun.

By Sven DiMilo (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Growing up in Alaska... -Miki Z

It's good to see another Pharynguloid from the Last Frontier! :)

By aratina cage o… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Imagine (if necessary) yourself a molecular biologist. You've got all the tools needed to isolate, amplify, and sequence DNA (these don't come cheap even today btw; nobody, not even molecular biologists, has the apparatus set up in the kitchen). You are brought a hair or shit sample from North America.

Now you have to primer out a gene of interest, PCR-amplify it, and run it through the auto-sequencer. BLAST the resulting sequence.

WTF? Seems to cluster with primates? Try another gene or two. Maybe a mitochondrial.

Still a primate, but not any known species?

Yes, now is the time to shut up about your incredible discovery and maybe leak out a surreptitious "tale" or anonymous internet "report."

This shit is just so fucking stupid it makes my eyeballs hurt.

By Sven DiMilo (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

This happens more than you would believe, Sven. I've got proofs of P vs. NP and the Hodge Conjecture. I just keep them secret to keep people guessing. I'll release them when it stops being funny.

Coincidentally, my wife is watching "Bones" right now, with this great quote by a UFO-nut:

I know things. People laugh at me, but I know things, and I deserve a little respect for that.

Springs to mind for some reason.

...the average dishonest, lazy, cowardly, unthinking human is not a great asset in its own right for the truth-seeking (ie atheism and science) side...

I know there's a larger context to this statement, and you do later go to saying that, regardless, you do want to keep these people away from religion anyway. And this I'd agree with, regardless.

I'd also add, however, that assuming (if anyone is) even said segment of the population is unchangeable would be unreasonably pessimistic.

My view is: people are naturally curious, at the very least. There's an awful lot of ways of subverting that curiosity, an awful lot of ways of distracting yourself with minutiae and trivia--burning off brain cycles on rote learning, computer solitaire and baseball scores--and apathy of various kinds adding up to undue tolerance of incredible batshit unreason can often seem just as frustrating as that unreason...

But people, in my experience, are also easily fascinated with reality, in all its complexity and beauty, too. Religion, in my mind, must actively work to suppress and subvert that to survive.

I've often suspected this is part of why religious services are held weekly--or even more frequently--to steer the mind actively in the directions wanted, away from those not wanted, to keep that creed echoing through the neurons so they don't get busy with something that might undermine it.

As to why, I dunno. I wouldn't call myself so much an optimist at all, but I've talked with a lot of segments of society, for various reasons, over the years--partly from some years as a reporter, partly from having been through a few career changes, partly from a few hobbies that seem to attract quite a cross-section, and I'm the garrulous type, in person--give me five minutes in an environment I'm not shouting to talk in, and I'll talk. And in my admittedly limited experience, there's an awful lot of people who seem to know squat about anything who want to know more about everything. I've talked to people about stellar evolution on chairlifts, and had them keep asking for more, not nodding off.

In my less charitable moments, I sometimes think society actually does it, in a sense, deliberately: tries to keep some people dumb, for various reasons. They want to know, they want to learn, they like to flex those (relatively) big, H. sapiens brains, given half a chance... But there's so much telling them: don't. Get lazy. Knowing, understanding, thinking too deeply, too rigourously, this isn't done... Advertising campaigns that lean on emotive, empty appeals and deliberately irrational associations between sex and whatever telling them that whatever you want to associate, for whichever reason, that's all good...

So, more briefly, I'd say: just because someone looks a little lazy, a little apathetic, don't count them out yet. People like to think. Sometimes, tho', they really only feel comfortable discovering how much they like doing so when they think certain influences--peers, priests, and family--aren't looking.

Then, of course, you have to get to the next phases: past curious through straightened out enough by where that curiosity leads to use their brain with some effectiveness, through to brave enough to express that aspect of themselves more publicly... But even getting to that second stage, I'd say it's a good thing, in the long run... And they don't even have to be brave enough to shout anything from the rooftops, either... So long as they're not also actively teaching their children the bullshit they themselves used to believe, that, too, is one hell of a victory.

I'm one of those who believes there will probably always be some degree of religiosity around much as a gardener expects there will always be weeds--and even if we were somehow to stamp out every old superstition tomorrow, there'd still be some annoying new ones next week--but I also do not hold to the notion there's really anyone who absolutely cannot shake off the older dogmas, and start really thinking for themselves, if they are given a good enough reason to do so, and the space to do so. It is no contradiction--thinking in terms of, say, epidemiology.

So, more to the point: there is so much that is possible just through speaking up, just through educating, just through getting that spark of curiosity started, however you do so.

aratina cage,

I grew up in Fairbanks, went to junior high and high school there, and moved away shortly after I graduated from high school. I don't drive, so I'd never move back there, but I have some good memories of it.

like this, for example.

Awesome!!!

Waterspout over Tampa Bay.

If that thing comes too close… :-S

http://www.wildernessbooks.com/lee/lee/owhyee_river_lightning.html

Almost three-dimensional.

http://www.wildernessbooks.com/lee/lee/natures_glory.html

Worthy of Terry Pratchett!

I saw a triple rainbow once and double ones occasionally.

There are a few animals shared between the two faunas. Birds for example, and bats (I think).

Wallace actually worked on birds when he discovered the Wallace Line between Bali and Lombok. Of course, some bird species don't care – there are even globally distributed ones –, but most do.

Are you barred from upgrading the OS on your Mac?

I'd have to buy it myself, which is ridiculous and way too expensive.

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

If not then I recommend getting a copy of either Leopard or Snow Leopard.

He can't run Snow Leopard. That is for MacTels only.

On the other hand, here are your own words: "[T]oo many people have an emotional investment in sasquatch being a lie. ... You have become afraid to admit to error, you and many more besides."

Reminds me of when cold fusion was first announced. As a scientist and skeptic, I was willing to tentatively, but skeptically, accept the announcement at face value. But it set my BS meter off big time, so I thought about it, and decided that I would not fully accept it until the "smoking gun" experimental results were there. Namely, both excess heat and neutrons, with the neutron output being expected for the extra heat seen. The results were never there, confirming I was right to be skeptical.

While catching up on my reading, Skeptical Inquirer Vol. 32, No. 6, had an article by Michael Dennett (pages 47-51), looking at the Patterson BF video, and the alleged footprint evidence from that scene. The timeline for the taking, printing, and first showing of the film is dubious, being almost physically impossible in that time. The footprint data was interesting, in that the alleged BF print was deeper than a hoofprint of a 1,200-1300 pound horse. Given the difference in foot area, this require poor BF to be horribly overweight at about 2,200 lbs. Hoax.

Like with cold fusion, I require the "smoking gun" evidence for BF. For me, a body, or even a reasonably complete skeleton is required. Scat or hair with good DNA analysis, which Sven #577 pointed out is both expensive and time consuming, would bring the concept that BF probably exists back into play. The body would be easier and cheaper. So, the burden of proof is upon those making claims to sasquatch existing to provide the necessary level of evidence. MM, do you have the body? If not, until you do, shut the fuck up on BF.

As an aside, the same issue of Skeptical Inquirer had a picture of our bearded overlord (page 9). Some asteroids were named, and PZ, Philip Plait, Michael Stackpole, and Rebecca Watson were honored.

By Nerd of Redhead, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Miki Z #581, I think growing up there qualifies you as an Alaskan. :) I never really got to stay long in Fairbanks over the summer and so I feel I have missed out on much of the grandeur of that city (like the midnight rainbows), but it is a hard place to go to and not take away some special memories. I was able to see the Northern Lights there several times in the dead of winter and one of those times I was mesmerized by what looked like a giant hand playing Liszt on the piano.

And in #579 you mentioned a quote from a Ufologist:

I know things. People laugh at me, but I know things, and I deserve a little respect for that.

Coincidentally, the National Geographic special on Bigfoot that mythusmage linked to in #424 (I swear it looks like a parody from the preview) also had Jeffrey Meldrum (the Sasquatch specialist) saying nearly the same thing. It shows Meldrum holding up casts of "big feet" and stomping ludicrously fake footprints in freshly laid soil to "prove" that the hundreds of mismatched Squatch footprints he has documented and collected could not have been faked. It even shows a map of the USA with lighted dots representing all reported Bigfoot sightings and wouldn't you know that the sightings correlate with bear populations. Unfortunately, National Geographic props up Meldrum vs. the rest of the scientific faculty at Idaho State as a continuing "debate" despite the fact that Meldrum is treated like a crackpot.

By aratina cage o… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

*headdesk*
Incomplete citation in #583. That was the Nov/Dec 2008 issue. Left out the year.

By Nerd of Redhead, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

I want to bite on something. Hard (so, not Jadehawk's neck). First I hit the keyboard somehow, so a cascade of random acts were triggered, which included submitting the comment. Naturally, I tried to interrupt that, but, as always, it didn't work.

Then, while trying to see the page with the Hodge Conjecture, I pressed an extra key and made the bookmarks bar show up. I tried to get rid of it by… showing all bookmarks (under the silly assumption that this was turned on and had to be turned off). Did Safari show me all bookmarks (whatever that actually means)? No. It crashed. Now I have to write the entire rest of my comment from scratch. I'm supposed to work here!!!

Fortunately it isn't much anymore.

The Dawkins passage used appears to be The "know-nothings", the "know-alls", and the "no-contests", which appeared in The Nullifidian, December 1994 .

Unfortunately, at the link you give, it's very sloppily retyped.

Imagine (if necessary) yourself a molecular biologist.

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

BLAST the resulting sequence.

…where BLAST means this.

"The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) finds regions of local similarity between sequences. The program compares nucleotide or protein sequences to sequence databases [ = GenBank] and calculates the statistical significance of matches. BLAST can be used to infer functional and evolutionary relationships between sequences as well as help identify members of gene families."

The footprint data was interesting, in that the alleged BF print was deeper than a hoofprint of a 1,200-1300 pound horse.

…Ouch.

I was able to see the Northern Lights there several times in the dead of winter and one of those times I was mesmerized by what looked like a giant hand playing Liszt on the piano.

~:-| How do you tell it was Liszt?

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Also, BLAST most assuredly is a blast. :-)

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

~:-| How do you tell it was Liszt?

The best way to view the northern lights is to lie outdoors in the snow. The lights may last for a few hours, and if you lie there until they're over, you'll probably realize you're suddenly feeling Liszt-less.

The lights are amazing, sometimes more than others. I remember in particular a night when they were a ribbon of purple and white light snapping audibly back and forth across the sky, bright enough to tint the snow purple.

SEF @571

If the large mass of mediocrity are generally held away from flocking with the religious nutters (both the dangerously insane and the criminally manipulative) and giving them protective cover, then those religious nutters can more properly be seen for the extremists and conmen that they are. So the big flock of sheeple will then be even more discouraged from hanging out with the rabid dogs and voracious wolves - despite the unlikelihood of the sheeple suddenly becoming sensible in their own right.

This is an excellent point. You clarified some of my own thinking about people from whom one cannot expect reasonableness when it comes to religion. They're likable perhaps, in other areas, intelligent in their chosen career, etc., but they also have very little perspective when it comes to the negative effects of religious nutters because they have a knee-jerk reaction to any discourse that puts religion in a negative light. Making it okay for the masses to look down on the nutters is one step in the right direction.

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

How do you tell it was Liszt?

The "finger" movement was crazy fast, all over the place, yet graceful with intense emotion, like so: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmq5JBpFf9w

The best way to view the northern lights is to lie outdoors in the snow.

Yes, I think I may have on Ester Dome for that show.

By aratina cage o… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

This is cool: experimental evidence for the evolution of "3-bears" DNA polymerase: both too much and too little error (mutation) is disadvantageous.

By Sven DiMilo (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Cool, but not rare at all. Problem is that to see them, you have to be looking right at the sun.

Are you saying I was staring at the sun?
It wouldn't be the first time. . .

By Gyeong Hwa Pak… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Prop. 8 puts Paramount board member on hold is the title of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle. Oh, look, mormons are being persecuted for called to account for their support of Prop 8 ... again.

A $26,000 contribution to the initiative that banned same-sex marriage in California appears to have cost a 96-year-old former Mormon temple president his seat on the board that oversees Oakland's historic Paramount Theatre.
     Amid rising criticism from the gay community, Mayor Ron Dellums said Tuesday that he was putting on hold the reappointment of Lorenzo Hoopes, most likely signaling an end to Hoopes' 30-plus years on the Paramount board.
     "The community is asking us to reconsider, and that is what we are going to do," mayoral spokesman Paul Rose said.
     Hoopes, a past president of the Mormon temple in Oakland as well as a former Safeway executive, has been on the Paramount board since before the downtown theater was restored in the early 1970s....
     Mormon church members contributed an estimated $20 million to the Proposition 8 campaign. Hoopes, who supports civil unions for gays but not marriage, said his support for the 2008 initiative - and the contribution he made - was a personal matter.
By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink
Third and forth order rainbow. Very rare.

Cool, but not rare at all. Problem is that to see them, you have to be looking right at the sun.

Correct. I should have been more precise with my wording. Speaking of looking at the sun, I have on 2 separate occasions, seen naked eye sunspots.

BS

By Blind Squirrel FCD (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

On page 1003 of Stephen King's new novel "Under the Dome" the adjective "mormonesque" is used: "Another family!" Charlie Gibson said in a voice of approval that was almost Mormonesque."

The strange droning, restricted sing-song of mormon worthies during General Conference speeches has been remarked upon before. I don't know why the regular members don't notice. They do seem to soak it up though, because some them adopt the style unconsciously and they slip right into it when discussing religious matters.

One oddity that shows up more in past speeches than in present ones is the tendency of mormon worthies to smack their lips into the microphone. Don't know what that's all about, but it's irritating, mormonesque even.

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

I have on 2 separate occasions, seen naked eye sunspots.

And now you go by the soubriquet "Blind Squirrel".

@584

Unfortunately, National Geographic props up Meldrum vs. the rest of the scientific faculty at Idaho State as a continuing "debate" despite the fact that Meldrum is treated like a crackpot.

Meldrum graduated from BYU, of course, where he learned enough to do some good work on bipedal locomotion, and also how to veer wildly from the facts.

From wiki: Meldrum received his B.S. in zoology specializing in vertebrate locomotion at Brigham Young University (BYU) in 1982, his M.S. at BYU in 1984 and a Ph.D. in anatomical sciences, with an emphasis in biological anthropology, from State University of New York at Stony Brook...

From ex-mormon, Bob McCue:

Meldrum is an LDS scientist at Idaho State who has published a number of articles and at least one book related to science and Mormonism. He weighs in on the “you’ll never refute the Book of Mormon using DNA evidence” side of the DNA argument (see http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/pdf.php?filename=Mjk3NjA2NTc1LTEyLTEucG… )... offering a silly mixture of scripture, J. Smith’s meandering ideas, magical thinking and unparsimonious science, ...
     Hmmm. Might the same be said about the proposition that the Earth is very old? Indeed, there are many people with PhD’s in geology, mostly on staff at Biblical literalist educational institutions (using that term a bit loosely) who argue that the case has not been definitively made that the Earth is much more than 6,000 years old. “You can’t prove it!” is their battle cry....      Says Meldrum, “I'm not out to proselytize that Bigfoot exists. I place legend under scrutiny and my conclusion is, absolutely. Bigfoot exists."
     Does anyone see a pattern yet?
     See http://www.isu.edu/~meldd/fxnlmorph.html for a sample of Meldrum’s Big Foot work, and http://www.dailytidings.com/2006/1106/stories/1106_bigfoot.php [to see] how his professional peers view his research. The typical comment runs as follows:
     “… many scientists are embarrassed by what they call Meldrum's "pseudo-academic" pursuits and have called on the university to review his work with an eye toward revoking his tenure. One physics professor, D.P. Wells, wonders whether Meldrum plans to research Santa Claus, too.”
     Another of Meldrum’s colleague’s puts his finger of the problem’s root, as follows:
     “A scientist should not be a believer, said Martin Hackworth, a senior lecturer in the physics department at Idaho State University.”
By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

SEF: I didn't even make the connection when I posted! Actually,the reason naked eye sunspots are rarely observed is because a cirrostratus haze of the correct density must be present to make it safe.
The first time I noticed the phenomena was in high school. I went down the street pulling people out of cafes and making them look. "Do you realize what this would have meant to the trial of Galileo if this had occurred previous to his trial?"
No they didn't and they returned, unimpressed, to their coffee. This was the first time I realized that I was "not like the others."
Sven: as long as we are pulling techs on one another the third and forth order rainbows occur at 45.5 degrees from the sun and do not require looking directly at it. It helps to mask the sun with a building, watertower etc.

BS

By Blind Squirrel FCD (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

The LDS Crutch just bought a few more acres of downtown Salt Lake City.

Calling it an investment opportunity, the LDS Church has bought a 3.76-acre lot on the northeast corner of 400 West and North Temple in Salt Lake City....
"The land was purchased as a long-term investment with no immediate plans for development," LDS Church spokesman Scott Trotter said Tuesday.
The move follows the church's recent purchase of 13 downtown acres, including a block between 400 South and 500 South and West Temple and Main streets from Sinclair Cos., controlled by oil magnate Earl Holding. Church officials said that acquisition, estimated around $25 million, also is a long-term investment.

There are also plans for a new "North Temple viaduct" which the city has planned, but not yet constructed. The viaduct is part of an engineering project that would culminate in a TRAX train from Salt Lake City to the International airport. That might help revitalize the downtown, but I think it's also a plan to make it easier for mormons to fly into the airport and then take a train to Temple Square, the Conference Center etc. If the LDS Crutch would stop buying up the downtown, I would be all for better public transport for visitors, for transport to downtown hotels, fewer cars, etc. (Salt Lake City already has one of the worst smog problems in the USA, and that problem is getting worse every year.) Source is at http://www.sltrib.com/faith/ci_14224477

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

and if you lie there until they're over, you'll probably realize you're suddenly feeling Liszt-less.

:-D :-D :-D

I'll watch the videos later.

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

#574 SEF

Pretty geology - but only allowed to remain that way because of its lack of mineral value!

I can see your point but according to Prof. Ian Stewart who did a film there for the BBC:

They do not earn any money (from the cave), and sooner or later, when the financial situation of the mines change, will be closed. The water pumps will be removed and the cave will be flooded, and the crystals, again, will be out of our reach.

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/01/geologists-explore-giant-crysta…

Part 1 of a 5 part series on the crystal caves (others accessible from youtube):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpf51UH456U

Did Safari show me all bookmarks (whatever that actually means)? No. It crashed.

Given how many times you've mentioned that Safari crashes-- have you tried uninstalling and reinstalling it?

Have you tried installing Firefox and/or Opera and seeing if it's more stable?

Have you fscked your filesystems? (Note for dirty-minded non-geeks: This does not mean something dirty.)

Do other applications crash on this machine?

By Owlmirror (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

I want to bite on something. Hard (so, not Jadehawk's neck).

tease

Jadehawk, in my rabid and frantic concern over consuming oranges, I forgot to tell you that I liked your wordle.

:-)

and since this thread is slowly nearing its end as well (though who knows if PZ will have time to restart it anytime soon), I made another one, and I think this one is truly worthy of Pharyngula :-)

By Jadehawk, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

and in other news, it's supposed to snow on Friday. Yay!

By Jadehawk, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

the third and forth order rainbows occur at 45.5 degrees from the sun and do not require looking directly at it.

Right you are (about the 3rd order 'bow). Of course I was not recommending looking directly at the sun; that's counterindicated for anybody who enjoys vision. In any case, what you meant in the first place was "rarely seen," which is certainly true, and that's why.

By Sven DiMilo (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

I want to bite on something. Hard (so, not Jadehawk's neck).

tease

Jadehawk, in my rabid and frantic concern over consuming oranges, I forgot to tell you that I liked your wordle.

too...much...adorableness...

...I made another one, and I think this one is truly worthy of Pharyngula :-)

Indeed! (And "hard Squirrel Now"? Beauty.)

Have you fscked your filesystems? (Note for dirty-minded non-geeks: This does not mean something dirty.)

Yeah, that's what you geeks want us to believe.

By 'Tis Himself, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Hitler Finds Out Scott Brown Won Massachusetts Senate Seat (since we're abusing that meme anyway)

By Jadehawk, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

In BBC2 now;

Horizon: Pill Poppers.
Brilliant coverage of both the benefits of science based medicine and the evils of big pharma.

Check it on the iPlayer.

As a f'rinstance: Why do you get combinations of paracetamol and codeine? Sure paracetamol is a useful drug that is effective as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory pain releiver. The amount of codeine in them is not enough to help pain relief, but enough to make you addicted to codeine.

I want to bite on something. Hard (so, not Jadehawk's neck).
tease
[...]

too...much...adorableness...

...I made another one, and I think this one is truly worthy of Pharyngula :-)

Indeed! (And "hard Squirrel Now"? Beauty.)

Note, in particular, the proximity of "Jadehawk" to "Marjanović" in the wordle.

Further deponent sayeth not.

By Owlmirror (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

@ eddie #615:

The amount of codeine in them is not enough to help pain relief

Ah but the real trick there is that they put in more of the drug which genuinely does have a worthwhile effect - eg aspirin. So, whereas a standard aspirin would be 300mg, the aspirin in a standard aspirin-codeine mixed pill is 400mg. For average people taking 2 pills that's 600mg straight aspirin vs 800mg contaminated aspirin. So it's no wonder the victim/patient notices some genuine improvement - which they can be misled into attributing to the codeine rather than the aspirin.

However, very few people are smart enough to read the label (despite the fact that regulations do now at least force manufacturers to own up more and more to what they've actually put into stuff) and work out the trick that's being played on them. Otherwise more of them would figure out that the correct thing to do instead is to take the maximum safe dose of straight aspirin, viz 3 x 300mg, and have a slightly higher dose again (900mg) while avoiding the codeine trap altogether.

You're also allowed more aspirin overall in a day too. 4g aspirin is greater than the total from 4 doses of 3 aspirin (3.6g) which in turn is greater than 4 lots of 2 codeine-contaminated pills (3.2g).

Very Spanish

I was looking by the version of Spanish Fly by Avant Jazz guys Cavemen but can't find a no-pay version :-(

Given how many times you've mentioned that Safari crashes-- have you tried uninstalling and reinstalling it?

Reinstalling from where? Only version 4 can be downloaded.

Have you tried installing Firefox and/or Opera and seeing if it's more stable?

I tried Firefox. Then I tried to upgrade it to 3.5. It doesn't open anymore.

Have you fscked your filesystems? (Note for dirty-minded non-geeks: This does not mean something dirty.)

...Then... what does it mean?

(See also comment 611.)

Do other applications crash on this machine?

Rarely. And Safari crashes on those websites where it's plausible that 2005 technology can't deal with them, those with extra bells & whistles.

Usually, when I need to open something and can't get it to work in Safari, I now use Netscape 7.2, but that, too, can't deal with some things. Netscape has apparently been succeded by Flock, which presumably requires an Intel processor.

I made another one, and I think this one is truly worthy of Pharyngula :-)

HA! Smack dab in the middle, in the biggest font, front & center, "evidence". It is a science blog after all. =8-)

too...much...adorableness...

One detail isn't adorable, though – look how far the Redhead is separated from her nerd! :-(

Note, in particular, the proximity of

..."David" to "Bigfoot". Hm.

On the other hand, I'm next to "take time". That fits.

And while we're at words, here's something interesting from the ResearchBlogging widget:

"I got the word daft published in the British Medical Journal"

Congratulations.

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

SEF: You never specifically stated otherwise, but the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory pain reliever discussed in #615 is know as acetaminophen in the USA. The nasty stuff that takes out your liver when one tries to get high on codeine containing pills. This happens a lot.
BTW,In the USA, 100mg ibuprofen is available over the counter. 800mg tablets are prescription only, and a person is liable to be arested and charged for the poession thereof.

BS

By Blind Squirrel FCD (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory pain reliever discussed in #615 is know as acetaminophen in the USA.

In the UK, the common paracetamol codeine combination would be "co-codamol".

The nasty stuff that takes out your liver when one tries to get high on codeine containing pills.

That would be the paracetamol. Nasty and almost useless stuff compared with aspirin. Yet, for the past couple(?) of decades they've been trying to push it as the safer option when in fact, not only does it barely have any worthwhile effect at all (compared to aspirin's 3 pronged efficacy) but it's actually more dangerous in overdose than aspirin is! It only functions as fractionally better than a complete placebo for people who can't tolerate aspirin. It's a stupid "choice" for anyone who can tolerate aspirin.

Here's Rubinstein, but you can't see his hands much

Heh! LOL! It stopped playing at 2:25 because it can't keep up loading, and the fingers of the left hand are in several places at once in that single frame! :-D

The "finger" movement was crazy fast, all over the place, yet graceful with intense emotion, like so:

...

Speechless.

It's like working on Supersaurus and Sauroposeidon and suddenly seeing Amphicoelias fragillimus walk by.

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Walking Spanish Down The Tall

See... I was assuming this was some sort of cracked cover version... Possibly 'Walking Spanish' as performed by some guy on stilts... But noooooo....

Not that having the master hisself do the thing is in any way unsatisfactory, natch... The problem here is typos, an overactive imagination, and the general observation that Waits has to be one of the most covered artists anywhere on the planet.

(/And if there isn't actually a 'Walking Spanish Down the Tall' version out there somewhere, well, there should be.)

A quick one, gtgt work.

but it's actually more dangerous in overdose than aspirin is!

I don't know about that.At least Paracetamol O/D I can fix with an antidote, Aspirine not so much.

And btw, Paracetamol has no anti-inflammatory effects whatsoever.

By Rorschach (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Good-bye

By mythusmage (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Ta-ta.

By Nerd of Redhead, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Good-bye

What?! No! Argue! Now!

Look, don't joke. You're a fixture here. Come on. Don't be silly.

mythusmage, you there? Please answer.

At least Paracetamol O/D I can fix with an antidote

Not if it's too late and the liver damage effect has already been set in motion.

Alan,

Post anything. Please.

It would seem MythusMage has transitioned from the manic to the depressive phase.

By John Morales (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Damn! I've been confusing the terms anti-inflammatory and Antipyretic. Thanks Rorschach.

BS

By Blind Squirrel FCD (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

You're a fixture here.

Are you trying to sell the thread, all fixtures and fittings included, before we move on to a new home?

Given how many times you've mentioned that Safari crashes-- have you tried uninstalling and reinstalling it?

Reinstalling from where?

Apple doesn't provide reinstallation media with their machines?

Srsly?

I tried Firefox. Then I tried to upgrade it to 3.5. It doesn't open anymore.

Sigh.

OK, can you uninstall and reinstall that?

Have you fscked your filesystems? (Note for dirty-minded non-geeks: This does not mean something dirty.)

...Then... what does it mean?

FileSystem ChecK. Corrupt filesystem => programs failing.

Hm. Does the machine need to have MacOS on it? I suppose you wouldn't be comfortable installing a Linux distro on it....

Note, in particular, the proximity of

..."David" to "Bigfoot". Hm

Hur, hur, hur.

By Owlmirror (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

SC, that you seem genuinely concerned makes me concerned too. :|

By John Morales (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Hey, mythusmage, defend Bigfoot. I dare you.

Look, you're a part of this blog. Don't go anywhere.

I like how Jadehawk's first Wordle had "Oh done old" in the middle of the O of OM.

AJ Milne, as always, we have the scapechimp. Why does he insist on passing on his typo cooties? And you are right, the new title is quite evocative.

By Janine, Mistre… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Alan, what's going on?

What do you want to talk about?

Post something.

SC, you know there is always new people to tangle with.

By Janine, Mistre… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

SC, you know there is always new people to tangle with.

usually I agree, but in hte case of people with known mental problems, such sudden, visible yet not explained departures are usually not a good sign :-/

By Jadehawk, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Good-bye

Come on! Hello? Is it me you're looking for? :P

mythusmage,

What's going on?

Just post anything, amd I'll be the happiest girl in the world. Please, please, please.

I agree with SC and Jadehawk. Alan, please come back, and don't do anything foolish.

mythusmage,

I completely understand if you just want to go to another site. Please just let us know that that's what you mean by Good-bye.

Alan, everyone here understands. Let's talk and argue. Even if you're not up to that, just a letter, or a symbol, or anythig to let me know you're still there.

Alan?

Don't be a tease. :)

Janine,

Are you fucking crazy? This isn't a joke.

SC - you're fine.

By Patricia, Quee… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

I am sorry. I have been ignoring Mythusmage.

By Janine, Mistre… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

SC - you're fine.

And mythusmage?

I see SC is worried Alan K (MM) might do something drastic to himself. I simply thought he was being melodramatic, irritated because we weren't agreeing with him about sasquatch, and not letting him dictate the topics.

By Nerd of Redhead, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

I would hope Alan is AFK, rather than just being cruel to SC (who very clearly is exceedingly concerned) or something worse.

By John Morales (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Alan, please, just let us know you're OK. I know I'm melodramatic, so feel free to make fun of me.

Alan, come out come out wherever you are.

By 'Tis Himself, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

And mythusmage?

I don't know how he is.

But you are fine, that's my way of giving you a cyber hug, and support.

In the mean time I'm gonna go share a Walnetto with Janine.

By Patricia, Quee… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Right, so, incidentally, 18700

By Sven DiMilo (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Good-bye

But you've, generaly, been welcomed here
Hugs. :)

Alan, please, just let us know you're OK. I know I'm melodramatic, so feel free to make fun of me.

Hugs. :)

I lost my lab manual in the rain today. I blame Jadehawk and AJ Milne. *Pokes

By Gyeong Hwa Pak… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Fuck. After a quick google search, I'm really worried about mythusmage now too. Is someone in San Diego who can check on him?

By aratina cage o… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

mythusmage, I know nothing about Aspergers, and online I just usually don't deal because I don't how to deal. This might have come off as ignoring you, but that's not the case. I read your posts.

If you'd like to educate me about Aspergers syndrome (sp?), please feel free.

This has been described as "an explosive day" in the Prop. 8 trial in California. Here's an excerpt from some of the coverage:

The transcripts from this afternoon read like an episode of Law and Order, with the attorneys arguing with the judge over what documents ought to be introduced as evidence. These aren’t just any old documents, they are emails and letters sent back and forth between the Prop 8 campaign and Catholic, LDS, and Evangelical churches.
     For example, one letter indicated that the LDS church had identified a volunteer for the campaign in every single zip code. This was a church document that was in the hands of a Prop 8 campaign official, and thus was discoverable. Andy Pugno, the general council for ProtectMarriage.com tried his darnedest to get Judge Walker to exclude it, but failed. From Rick’s liveblog:
Pugno: Objects because document will be revealing.
Judge: Not to make light of this, but the reason people want to produce documents is that they are revealing.
Boutrous: It’s from an outsider to the core group. We are attempting to show the level of coordination with groups that Protect Marriage says were not even affiliated with the campaign.
     This is perhaps the most explosive bit of all, from a document between the LDS Church and the campaign:
"With respect to Prop. 8 campaign, key talking points will come from campaign, but cautious, strategic, not to take the lead so as to provide plausible deniability or respectable distance so as not to show that church is directly involved."
By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Alan, as you can see, (at least some) regulars care and are worried about you.

Please post anything so as to reassure us, and be assured that I (and others) will come down like a ton of bricks on anyone who disses you for it. Seriously.

By John Morales (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

For those who may want to follow the Prop 8 trial going on now in California, here are some links:

The Courage Campaign provides transcript-like coverage interspersed with commentary since Day 1 (with 2-3 liveblogging entries per day) of the trial here: http://prop8trialtracker.com/ Note the logo which is a parody of the Yes on 8 campaign and which sparked its own kerfuffle last week.

For details of the logo fight, see -http://prop8trialtracker.com/2010/01/15/irony-defined/ This blog also includes quite a few commentary/discussion posts in addition to the liveblogging posts.

Firedoglake is covering the trial live: http://firedoglake.com/prop8trial/

The San Jose Mercury News has a reporter providing live coverage http://www.mercurynews.com/samesexmarriage

The Los Angeles Times has daily reports here: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/prop_8/

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Lynna,

This type of thing is not so surprising anymore, but it is highly hypocritical. Given that the LDS church doesn't regard non-temple marriages as being anything other than a temporal partnership, what is their investment in traditional marriage? I remember being taught as a very young child that polygamy was God's style of marriage, and that when we were 'spiritually ready', God would make it legal again. This was in the "mainstream" LDS, not FLDS, RLDS, or any other *LDS sect. If marriage equality will lead to polygamy, aren't they fighting God's will?

Alan - The offers of support here are serious. They have been helping me through the death of my husband, and they will help you too.

Sorry, gawd won't, but we will.

By Patricia, Quee… (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

@ mythusmage

I know I've been riding you for being irrational, but only because I sincerely want you to be more rational. (I wouldn't bother if I didn't think you were up to it.) But before that, I want you to be alive and well. Can you let people know you're at least alive?

Lynna (#666)

"Judge: Not to make light of this, but the reason people want to produce documents is that they are revealing."

Can't you just imagine the judge fantasizing about taking his gavel to someone's head?

~*~*~*~*~*~

MikiZ (#668)

what is their investment in traditional marriage?

Marketing. It's easier to sell people outside the church on "protecting traditions" rather than "using religion as an excuse to deprive fellow human beings of their equal rights."

Have you fscked your filesystems? (Note for dirty-minded non-geeks: This does not mean something dirty.)

I fsck my filesystems all the time; but, of course, with filesystems the size of mine, it takes a while. Thankfully, I can fsck a couple of them at the same time. The only thing I find annoying is them demanding to be fscked when I want to do something else.

By Emmet, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

My favourite Bigfoot hoax was of the hairy figure trotting away, followed by "experts" wisely opining that this couldn't be a human because it didn't have the proportions of a man. Some years later, the fellow with the convenient film camera revealed that the person in the ape suit was his wife. Sexist assumptions will bite you on the ass when you least expect it.

I'm not entirely clued in to the discussion about/with AK/MM but for the concerned, a more recent sighting here.

thanks windy; i guess that indicates that he's just sick of us, but otherwise fine. I can live with that :-)

By Jadehawk, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Good pickup, Windy. It assuages my guilt-free worry. :)

--

On another note, Leigh still has not responded to me regarding whether she's honest on the occasions when she asserts her belief by reciting the Apostles' Creed.

By John Morales (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

windy - Thank You!

Alan Kellogg now owes me one good night's sleep and the enjoyment of one set of trig puns.

And apologies to Janine and Patricia. I can get worked up into a frenzy of worry. It may be genetic.

:)

SC, it may be genetic, but it's also contagious!

By John Morales (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

it snowed! only a wee tiny bit, and by tomorrow morning stoopid people will ruin it by driving cars over it, but it looks soooooooooooooo pretty right now!

hopefully Friday will bring enough snow that people doing people stuff won't be able to ruin it.

By Jadehawk, OM (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Bit of paranoia going on here, I see....
Unfounded, methinks.

SEF @ 632,

Not if it's too late and the liver damage effect has already been set in motion.

No that's not correct, even then it is still protective of hepatocytes.It is not like some unstoppable avalanche of damage once a tipping point is reached.

Have you fscked your filesystems?

Unless it asks you too, a unix-based system shouldnt have to be fscked, this stuff runs in the background without you ever noticing.
Only ever happens to me on Unix I run on USB sticks, somehow after a while the inodes break, and all fscking in the world won't fix it anymore.

I want to bite on something. Hard (so, not Jadehawk's neck).

tease

Get a room already, you too !!

:-)

By Rorschach (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

Get a room already, you [two]!!

Aww, won't you think of the voyeurs? ;)

--

Bit of paranoia going on here, I see....
Unfounded, methinks.

No harm done, though.

By John Morales (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

/note to self

too and two mean different things

/end note to self

By Rorschach (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

It is not like some unstoppable avalanche of damage once a tipping point is reached.

It is when the tipping point includes the amount of alcohol (or other susceptibility factor) and passage of time before anyone even considers doing anything! In the UK, what had tended to happen (it may perhaps not be so true any more) is that people overdosed, didn't die immediately, were thought to be OK (being largely asymptomatic initially) and then died of the liver failure just a little later.

I have been treating those overdoses for more then 10 years and in all this time had to send 3 or 4 patients to the transplant unit.Once you come to Hospital, and especially within 12 hours, you are probably going to be ok.

The issue here is that a potentially fatal drug is consumed by the general population like lollies, and anyone can acquire large amounts of the stuff in their local supermarket.

It is not a nice way to die, by the way, not at all.

By Rorschach (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink

There's a dearth of nice deaths.

The issue here is that a potentially fatal drug is consumed by the general population like lollies, and anyone can acquire large amounts of the stuff in their local supermarket...

Yeah, y'know... And I'll tell you, honestly, reading this thread is making me mildly nervous.

I mean, I use a fair bit of paracetamol/acetaminophen, myself, on and off. Headaches (weird schedule, lot of time in front of screens, so do I get a fair number of these), muscle pulls, colds, flus, yadda yadda... Thinking I'd rarely exceed 2000 mg per day--might get to 3000 if I've really banged something up bad, or at the peak of a bad cold... And I do have a beer or two frequently enough that now and again my liver probably does take a pretty heavy load--between that and the analgesic...

I get that ASA also does the anti-inflammatory thing all by itself, but I do have occasional stomach issues (I have a prescribed proton pump inhibitor in the medicine cabinet, for when a too-spicy relleno starts getting revenge and irritating the bottom end of my esophagus), too... And odds are, if I've torn something up bad enough to need anti-inflammatories, the docs will put me on a dedicated one in a second anyway (on one now, actually, for a bruised rib)...

So now y'all are making me wonder about the acetaminophen by default thing again... Dunno... Thinking mebbe it should be ASA, anyway, after all, if I find it's not causing me to digest myself.

(/Heads off to read dosage recommendations/toxicity stuff more closely, again...)

Part of the problem with paracetamol is all the stealth paracetamol included with other products (along with stealth alcohol!). People can easily take some paracetamol alongside what they think is some magical cold remedy, without noticing that the cold remedy is itself laced with paracetamol. It's rather similar to the problem of all the stealth salt in processed foods.

Part of the problem with paracetamol is all the stealth paracetamol included with other products (along with stealth alcohol!). People can easily take some paracetamol alongside what they think is some magical cold remedy, without noticing that the cold remedy is itself laced with paracetamol.

Yeah, I've noticed the cold remedy thing. Also muscle relaxants for back pain--tho' there, at least, the common product here (Canada) tends to be available in a mix either with the paracetamol or ASA, take your pick... I guess given the use, people would be looking more for the ASA anti-inflammatory thing...

Also, in both cases, typically 'extra strength' for over the counter stuff generally seems to mean 500 mg vs. 325 of the paracetamol, not the decongestant/antihistamine/muscle relaxant/what-have-you.

Clarifying, re 'not the decongestant/antihistamine/muscle relaxant/what-have-you'... The point being: the dose per unit will be the same for these, between extra and regular strength--it's just the analgesic (usually paracetamol) dose that's different.

(/And in many cases, of course, consume either 325 or 500 mg of the other ingredient would be rather unwise.)

Finding a photo of me just got a whole lot easier. (But don't immediately start scrolling. Read the whole thing, comments included. It's also fine to get lost in the links for a while. :-) )

Also, I talked about the air in sauropod vertebrae. There are currently several posts about this on the front page of this blog.

Apple doesn't provide reinstallation media with their machines?

I think it does. I'll have to ask where the CD might be.

Sigh.

It's actually worse: it's 3.0, not 3.5, that I tried to upgrade to.

OK, can you uninstall and reinstall that?

I just deleted it (no uninstalling procedure seems to exist). But the only Firefox version I can find on mozilla.org is 3.5, which requires OS 10.4 or higher.

Corrupt filesystem => programs failing.

That isn't the case. Only Safari fails, and that only when I try to access too advanced websites.

Hm. Does the machine need to have MacOS on it? I suppose you wouldn't be comfortable installing a Linux distro on it....

I wouldn't, because there are programs here that wouldn't run on anything but MacOS. And is it even possible to run Linux on a G5?

Hur, hur, hur.

I noticed it myself and wanted to write something adorable about it before I saw you had covered it already. (Probably better that way. :-) ) So, all I got to do was making a lame joke. :-)

mythusmage, I know nothing about Aspergers, and online I just usually don't deal because I don't how to deal.

I don't think leaving in disgust is connected to Asperger's. Asperger's is more like SIWOTI syndrome.

However, where do we take our impression that disgust is involved from? Maybe no emotion whatsoever was intended. That's something Asperger's makes one capable of.

it snowed! only a wee tiny bit, and by tomorrow morning stoopid people will ruin it by driving cars over it, but it looks soooooooooooooo pretty right now!

hopefully Friday will bring enough snow that people doing people stuff won't be able to ruin it.

As I told you, people: she's not merely taking words out of my mouth, she's pirating entire thought processes right out of my brain and then setting them into words (which I probably wouldn't even have done in the first place). Now let's just hope she doesn't start mass-producing them in Shenzhen.

Autumn, uh, fall weather here, with a thick cloud cover, except that the sun comes through and briefly interrupts the darkness every afternoon.

By David Marjanović (not verified) on 21 Jan 2010 #permalink

Looking fine in that photo, David M.! BTW, I always pictured you in my mind as having fiery eyes. Nice to see I was right, though the red is slighting less saturated than I imagined. This makes you look like a thoughtful devil, a satan with a polite listening stance. :-)

Thanks for giving up on your whole hermit thing.

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 21 Jan 2010 #permalink

Another plea for someone in Europe (or anywhere, Europe is easier for shipping), who has a copy of the Leopard install disk that they are no longer using, to send it to David Marjanović.

David, if there is no response, I will see about backing up my firewire boot recovery volume, which is still Leopard (always one version behind the internal boot volume), and sending you my copy. IIRC, Safari 1 was so bad, I used Netscape or IE instead. Safari has gotten better.

By Nerd of Redhead, OM (not verified) on 21 Jan 2010 #permalink

SC, just heard about this book, Mythmakers and Lawbreakers: Anarchist Writers on Fiction. Guess I will have to hunt for a copy.

Funny, it was couple of decades ago while reading a lot of Ursula LeGuin and Edward Abbey (Could two authors be more different?) that my political thought was more anarchistic in nature then anything else. I guess it is time to dig up my old copy of Always Coming Home.

By Janine, Mistre… (not verified) on 21 Jan 2010 #permalink

Finding a photo of me just got a whole lot easier. (But don't immediately start scrolling. Read the whole thing, comments included

I knew you were evil. Just look at those devil eyes.

By Rev. BigDumbChimp (not verified) on 21 Jan 2010 #permalink

"slighting" should be "slightly" in my post @694 -- this mistake was made in a post intentionally slighting David M's devilish eyes.

Back to enjoying morning coffee, and researching the costs of CT scans at local sources of medical imaging --I'm still in fuck'em mode most of the time, but trying to resist sounding like that on the phone. I may need some of these people to cut me a break.

By Lynna, OM (not verified) on 21 Jan 2010 #permalink

Again? Jeez, you guys, it's like you can't shut up.

More space for conversation here.