This is a rather horrifying article about young girls reading Harry Potter one moment, and then dragged off to get their clitorises chopped off. It's got these nasty little details like, if you pay extra, you can get the butcher to use a clean knife.
But there's an odd disjoint here, too. It's the UK, a modern western nation. They have laws to prohibit mangling children.
The UK Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act 1985 makes it an offence to carry out FGM or to aid, abet or procure the service of another person. The Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003, makes it against the law for FGM to be performed anywhere in the world on UK permanent residents of any age and carries a maximum sentence of 14 years imprisonment. To date, no prosecutions have been made under UK legislation.
That's clear: a strict law and strong penalties, but no prosecutions — so it must be an effective law, right?
Wrong.
Some 500 to 2,000 British schoolgirls will be genitally mutilated over the summer holidays. Some will be taken abroad, others will be "cut" or circumcised and sewn closed here in the UK by women already living here or who are flown in and brought to "cutting parties" for a few girls at a time in a cost-saving exercise.
It's happening right now. It seems to me that there ought to be 500-2000 arrests in the UK this year, maybe more, since they've got a 7 year backlog of neglected criminality.
If medical neglect of children can be a prosecutable crime here in benighted America, why isn't the UK doing something to stop active, vicious mutilation of children?
- Log in to post comments