Good old American thugs

THIS WAS SSSOOOOO AWESOME!!!!!

Two guys harrass a protestor...and she's clearly able, right after, to hold a mini press conference showing how un-hurt she is -- not a bruise, not a scratch. Even her hair wasn't all that messed up. She even smiled just a little. If you didn't see what just happened, there's no indication anything happened. Sure, it LOOKED bad -- but clearly those doing the assault & battery were play acting. Otherwise, she'd be visibly messed up or even dead with a broken neck and/or skull.

That's DEAD as what a number of LIBERAL thugs have done, some recent noteworthy examples:

John Patrick Bedell -- Pentagon shooter & Registered Democrat!

James Von Brunn -- Holocaust museum shooter & who also said that he was an "anti-Christian, 9/11 'truther' who hated the Bushes and 'the neo-cons'"

IF two guys that didn't really hurt a protestor at a Tea Party rally can be construed as "thugs" representative of an entire group -- what is called "Sweeping Generalization" and is faultly, usual false, "logic."

THEN application of the same [il]logic clearly indicates that Liberals/Democrats & guns make for homicidal maniacs -- especially if they're also atheists (look at Von Brunn's body count). Maybe that's why they're so opposed to gun rights? The "data" & keen analytical techniques used by most commenters here, including the host, obviously supports this.

Don't forget so many other instances of LIBERAL violence & overt expression of hate:

http://www.aei.org/article/27371 (this is a bona fide scientific study!)

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/11/024966.php

http://www.verumserum.com/?p=10295

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/31/video-the-chicago-way/

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mithridate-ombud/2010/03/24/medias-myth-ri…

http://michellemalkin.com/2006/08/31/assassination-chic/

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/17/the-statistical-proof-of-liberal-i…

And the now infamous video illustrating, once again, that LIBERALS ARE TOLERANT ONLY AS LONG AS YOU AGREE WITH THEM: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1317079/Richard-Curtis-explodin…

THIS WAS SSSSOOOOOOO AWESOME!

The protestor was NOT hurt â not a scratch, not a bruise ⦠her hair looked relatively neat. She even smiled at the subsequent press interview! Obviously the two (2) guys that assaulted her didnât actually do much more than play act â otherwise sheâd be dead with a broken skull or neck.

Thatâs DEAD as is customary for MANY LIBERAL people, some noteworthy examples:

John Patrick Bedell - Pentagon shooter & Registered Democrat

James Von Brunn -- the Holocaust museum shooter who said he was an "anti-Christian, 9/11 'truther' who hated the Bushes and 'the neo-cons'"

IF one accepts PZâs simpleminded [il]logic that two guys are representative of a much larger group
THEN one must concede that LIBERALS are inclined to homicidal frenzies if they get a firearm â especially if theyâre an atheist.

Of course, PZâs simpleminded analysis methodology & the above application of it is an example of a âSweeping Generalizationâ & as such is immediately suspect. Sometimes theyâre correct, but usually wrong.

Too bad the majority of readers here simply donât get it.

But to get back on point, LIBERALS have been shown to be MUCH less tolerant, despite protestations to the contrary, and inclined to much more violence than those on the ârightâ:

Actual Study: http://www.aei.org/article/27371

http://michellemalkin.com/2006/08/31/assassination-chic/

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/17/the-statistical-proof-of-liberal-i…

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/11/024966.php

http://www.verumserum.com/?p=10295

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/31/video-the-chicago-way/

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mithridate-ombud/2010/03/24/medias-myth-ri…

And of course the now infamous, classic, example of âLIBERALS ARE TOLERANT ONLY AS LONG AS YOU TOTALLY AGREE WITH THEMâ video:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1317079/Richard-Curtis-explodin…

THIS WAS SSSSOOOOOOO AWESOME!

The protestor was NOT hurt â not a scratch, not a bruise ⦠her hair looked relatively neat. She even smiled at the subsequent press interview! Obviously the two (2) guys that assaulted her didnât actually do much more than play act â otherwise sheâd be dead with a broken skull or neck.

Thatâs DEAD as is customary for MANY LIBERAL people, some noteworthy examples:

John Patrick Bedell - Pentagon shooter & Registered Democrat

James Von Brunn -- the Holocaust museum shooter who said he was an "anti-Christian, 9/11 'truther' who hated the Bushes and 'the neo-cons'"

IF one accepts PZâs simpleminded [il]logic that two guys are representative of a much larger group
THEN one must concede that LIBERALS are inclined to homicidal frenzies if they get a firearm â especially if theyâre an atheist.

Of course, PZâs simpleminded analysis methodology & the above application of it is an example of a âSweeping Generalizationâ & as such is immediately suspect. Sometimes theyâre correct, but usually wrong.

Too bad the majority of readers here simply donât get it.

But to get back on point, LIBERALS have been shown to be MUCH less tolerant, despite protestations to the contrary, and inclined to much more violence than those on the ârightâ:

Actual Study: http://www.aei.org/article/27371

http://michellemalkin.com/2006/08/31/assassination-chic/

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/17/the-statistical-proof-of-liberal-i…

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/11/024966.php

http://www.verumserum.com/?p=10295

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/31/video-the-chicago-way/

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mithridate-ombud/2010/03/24/medias-myth-ri…

And of course the now infamous, classic, example of âLIBERALS ARE TOLERANT ONLY AS LONG AS YOU TOTALLY AGREE WITH THEMâ video:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1317079/Richard-Curtis-explodin…

From a colleague:

The protestor was NOT hurt â not a scratch, not a bruise ⦠her hair looked relatively neat. She even smiled at the subsequent press interview! Obviously the two (2) guys that assaulted her didnât actually do much more than play act â otherwise sheâd be dead with a broken skull or neck.

Thatâs DEAD as is customary for MANY LIBERAL people, some noteworthy examples:

John Patrick Bedell - Pentagon shooter & Registered Democrat

James Von Brunn -- the Holocaust museum shooter who said he was an "anti-Christian, 9/11 'truther' who hated the Bushes and 'the neo-cons'"

IF one accepts PZâs simpleminded [il]logic that two guys are representative of a much larger group (& I do not)

THEN one must concede that LIBERALS are inclined to homicidal frenzies if they get a firearm â especially if theyâre an atheist.

Of course, PZâs simpleminded analysis methodology & the above application of it is an example of a âSweeping Generalizationâ & as such is immediately suspect. Sometimes theyâre correct, but usually wrong.

Too bad the majority of readers here simply donât get it.

But to get back on point, LIBERALS have been shown to be MUCH less tolerant, despite protestations to the contrary, and inclined to much more violence than those on the ârightâ:

Actual Study: http://www.aei.org/article/27371

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/11/024966.php

http://www.verumserum.com/?p=10295

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/31/video-the-chicago-way/

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mithridate-ombud/2010/03/24/medias-myth-ri…

And of course the now infamous, classic, example of âLIBERALS ARE TOLERANT ONLY AS LONG AS YOU TOTALLY AGREE WITH THEMâ video:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1317079/Richard-Curtis-explodin…