No Dice?

From a New York Times article describing the Nature Theater of Oklahoma's production of "No Dice:"

"Poetics," for example, was choreographed using dice. Each face on the die represented one of six possible gestures, and each appendage -- two arms, two legs and the head -- got its own roll of the dice. Dice determined where the actors stand and for how long. There are four actors in "Poetics," but, alas, no such thing as a four-sided die. So, to determine who did what, the directors used a dreidel.

No such thing as a four sided dice? Obviously no one among the choreographers has played Dungeons & Dragons:
i-a804bd66a878f84b04f70af78d143826-4-sided_dice_250.jpg

More like this

The first key concept in probability is called a random variable. Random variables are a key concept - but since they're a key concept of the frequentist school, they are alas, one of the things that bring out more of the Bayesian wars. But the idea of the random variable, and its key position in…
"Every man has a right to utter what he thinks truth, and every other man has a right to knock him down for it." - Samuel Johnson I have a six-sided die. I'm going to roll it ten times, and record each roll. And when I'm done, I'm going to have an incredibly rare, bet-you-can't-reproduce-it result…
Yet another reader forwarded me a link to a rather dreadful article. This one seems to be by someone who knows better, but prefers to stick with his political beliefs rather than an honest exploration of the facts. He's trying to help provide cover for the anti-global warming cranks. Now, in light…
There are 22 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with…

Indeed, this is deeply disturbing! Then again, back in the days of oldfashioned pen & paper cons, I remember a friend of mine asking for "six-sided dice" in a mom-and-pop store around the corner, and total incomprehension ensued---until one of us slightly rephrased the question.

(Just got here after reading the article "Blog life: The Quantum Pontiff" on physicsworld.com, http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/32282 , and wouldn't you know! The first posting I come across is about D&D ...)

^_^J.

I happen to be a collector of odd dice (as I think I mentioned in the lengthy probability debate). The strangest are two perfectly round dice that always show a number exactly face up (there's a ball bearing rolling around inside and indentations into which it falls, thus forcing a particular number face up). I also have an interested pair of Kama Sutra dice, all the usual D&D dice, and plan to someday purchase a set of weather dice: http://www.dicecollector.com/THE_DICE_THEME_WEATHER.html. I've also seen a huge (and unwieldy) 100-sided die once.

Really, though, a dreidl is most likely far better at achieving a random result than using a tetrahedral die - and you don't have to worry about the dreaded "caltrop effect" with a dreidl!

I guess the later point would be even more important for dancers :)