Nobel in Chemistry

The Nobel in Chemistry for 2009 has been awarded to Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, Thomas Steitz and Ada Yonath for "for studies of the structure and function of the ribosome." And because I am (or was, or am, or..whatever) a physicist, I will note that Venkatraman Ramakrishnan has a Ph.D. in physics :)

And today is even more busy than yesterday!

Tags

More like this

The 2009 Nobel Prize in Chemistry has been awarded to Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, Thomas A. Steitz and Ada E. Yonath "for studies of the structure and function of the ribosome." I know just about enough to recognize this as something biochemical, but I'm sure there will be plenty of commentary about…
The winners of this year's Nobel Prize in Chemistry have been announced, and the prize will be shared equally between Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, Thomas Steitz, and Ada Yonath "for studies of the structure and function of the ribosome." The information encoded in DNA is decoded to produce functional…
Follow me on Twitter to get these, and more, in something closer to Real Time: Buying a Coke in Africa: are there lessons for malaria? The Paleo Paper Challenge in the Blogosphere (see also) RT @anthonymobile: The Open Laboratory 2008 anthology of science blogs is one of the most fun things i've…
By now, you probably already know that Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, Thomas A. Steitz and Ada E. Yonath won the Nobel in chemistry for their work on the structure of the ribosome, and a well-deserved award it is. They (and many others) put a lot of work into puzzling out how this central feature of the…

Theory? Experiment? Heck ... *that* style of science is *so* twentieth century.

This particular prize was all about observation and simulation ... and it has to make us wonder whether (essentially) *all* future Nobel prizes awarded for chemistry, condensed matter physics, and medicine will be similar.

The point being, many scientific disciplines are evolving to become more observation-intensive and simulation-intensive ... and the quantum and informatic limits to to observation and simulation are very far from being exhausted.

Some folks claim that there will be four branches of science: theory, experiment, observation, and simulation.

But IMHO, this is baloney. Perhaps the four branches of science will be theory, experiment, observation, and ... this is the heretical part ... *narrative* ... with simulation being (in essence) the software aspect of narrative.

The Nobel committee is having to become really creative in what counts as "chemistry" these days.