You all scoff at me for subscribing to the RSS feed http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/rss.xml but on Oct. 12 it told me
NO AND NOR WILL IT IN 2012
Aha! What will this do to the sales of 2012 end of world books? (Crap, yeah you're right it will probably make them go up.)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The latest update on the crisis in Fukushima. The hot spots are everywhere. Be careful where you step!
But first, we'd like to introduce the handy-dandy Fukushima Post and Ana's Feed search engine. This search engine will return results from this series of posts we've done. This is a good place…
The radiation at the Fukushima plants has gone up, rather than down, since June. This may be because contaminated water has become more concentrated due to evaporation. The release of radiation from the plant into the air continues, although a covering over Reactor 1 is almost completed. The…
One RSS feeds I subscribe to is the one at http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/. I mean, if the world is going to end, I certainly want Google reader to be the first to tell me. But today's RSS update is, instead of the traditional "no", different:
Bye bye everyone. This domain is not being…
Ah, the libertarian extremists have found my site and are making comments. It's a peculiar pathology that thinks environmentalism is an evil plot, that planning is communism/socialism, and that Jesus was a good capitalist. It is particularly irksome to try and deal with people who are so far gone…
From USA Today: ' For the ancient Maya, it was a huge celebration to make it to the end of a whole cycle," says Sandra Noble, executive director of the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies in Crystal River, Fla. To render Dec. 21, 2012, as a doomsday or moment of cosmic shifting, she says, is "a complete fabrication and a chance for a lot of people to cash in." '
Everything that you need to know about anything can be found in USA Today. ("All the news that fits, we print.") And, if USA Today runs out of space, that's why I subscribe to the NY Post...
I love the term "cosmic shifting." I always imagine the entire universe shifting just a little to the left. Or sometimes I imagine a gigantic binary register which has just been shifted left, multiplying by two. Of course the direction of this shift is just further evidence of my academic communist roots.
Dave: Perhaps "cosmic shifting" ... is like the SHIFT key on your computer keyboard? Alt-SHIFT-Delete for the universe....
Well, I'm certainly not one of the scoffers since I subscribe to the same feed...
The true prophecy is in these digits (which you must convert to the Mayan system, of course):
http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A140416
A140416 Decimal expansion of constant arising in quantum concatenated code Hamiltonians.
0, 0, 1, 9, 9, 3, 5, 7, 3, 3, 4, 6, 3, 0, 4, 1, 8, 3, 0, 9, 4, 4, 0, 4, 4, 7, 1, 8, 9, 5, 3, 6, 7, 0, 9, 7, 0, 2, 3, 8, 7, 1, 1, 1, 9, 6, 8, 2, 4, 3, 7, 4, 2, 9, 1, 6, 3, 7, 1, 7, 3, 1, 8, 0, 1, 8, 1, 2, 9, 4, 3, 8, 3, 8, 4, 2, 4, 0, 7, 4, 5, 5, 7, 1, 9, 8, 3, 0, 9, 7, 9, 1, 1, 2, 3, 9, 7, 6, 2, 2, 6, 6, 8, 4, 9, 5, 6, 8, 6, 2, 8, 4, 6, 9, 2, 2, 2, 7, 2, 0
OFFSET
0,4
COMMENT
0.0019935733463041830944. Equation (36) on p. 11 of Bacon.
Abstract: Protecting quantum information from the detrimental effects of decoherence and lack of precise quantum control is a central challenge that must be overcome if a large robust quantum computer is to be constructed. The traditional approach to achieving this is via active quantum error correction using fault-tolerant techniques.
An alternative to this approach is to engineer strongly interacting many-body quantum systems that enact the quantum error correction via the natural dynamics of these systems. Here we present a method for achieving this based on the concept of concatenated quantum error correcting codes.
We define a class of Hamiltonians whose ground states are concatenated quantum codes and whose energy landscape naturally causes quantum error correction. We analyze these Hamiltonians for robustness and suggest methods for implementing these highly unnatural Hamiltonians.
LINKS
David Bacon, The Stability of Quantum Concatenated Code Hamiltonians
FORMULA
(-71 + 869041^(1/2))/432000.
KEYWORD
cons,easy,nonn
AUTHOR
Jonathan Vos Post, Jun 17 2008
EXTENSIONS
Offset corrected. More digits added R. J. Mathar, Jan 26 2009