Singularity University GSP

It would be pretty cool to teach for that program. No recognizable quantum information people that I could gather from a quick list of the faculty though it did make me wonder if Vint Cerf of Google is any relation to Nicolas Cerf of Cerf-Adami inequality fame.

>> the various exponentially growing cross-disciplinary technologies

But this is very disappointing. I thought we need faster-than-exponential growth for the singularity ...

Yum Yum, I love word salad in the morning.

I was tempted, until I saw the real crazy part -- the putative $25000 price tag. Even if they offer a number of full and partial scholarships as they claim I can't see that attracting cash starved "top graduate students."

How much of the work is valid, and how much just a revenue stream for the tax-fraud Cult of Singularity, also used to sexually use interns? I have expert witnesses to all the implied claims here. I'd be so relieved if they had someone trustworthy such as Vernor Vinge as Dean of Faculty.

Stephan: Seen the price of a Harvard MBA recently?

We do the same, but over beers. And you only pay the beers, even the wi-fi is free. :-P

Someone (a full professor) defamed online by the Cult of Singularity, through the self-publishing autodidact Eliezer Yudkowsky who literally denied that he existed when he asked that they remove defamatory statements from a blog, and refused to verify his existence by checking with his university, or with his Physics and Quantum Computing and Finance papers on arXiv, emailed me to suggest: "I think they should do a joint venture with Maharishi International University, which is in Ames, Iowa." Have you seen the loony stuff spewed by Eliezer Yudkowsky on the video "debate" with Scott Aaronson on Shtetl-Optimized?

Jonathan: SU is based at NASA Ames (under founding sponsorship of Google), and has no relation to the Singularity Institute, or to Yudkowsky.

Thanks, Mike. I stand corrected.

Excerpt from a novel manuscript on which I've written 55,000 words in the past 2 weeks:

Los Alamos, 1958

I went back to Ulamâs office. I couldnât get out of my head what heâd said about Clarkeâs Third Law, âif alien artifacts were discovered, even here on our home planet, may they not be recognizable as such?â

âStan,â I said, âwhat happens to civilizations when they get magical? I mean when they have sufficiently advanced technology?â

âFunny you should bring that up,â he said. âI just had a conversation with John von Neumann about that. The talk centered on the ever accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life, which gives the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue.â

âSingularity, in the sense of a point at which an equation, or surface,â I asked, âblows up or becomes degenerate?â

âOf course,â he said. âIsolated singularities may be classified as poles, essential singularities, logarithmic singularities, or removable singularities. Nonisolated singularities may arise as natural boundaries or branch cuts.â

âYou should know,â I joked, âbecause youâre a Pole.â

âAnd youâre a degenerate,â he said. âAt least my job here is secure -- you know the lemma -- Removable singularities are not poles.â

The idea caught on, as we discussed it with others. Ulam told it to fellow Pole Jack Good. In 1965, I. J. Good first wrote of an âintelligence explosion.â

[below data from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I._J._Good]

Irving John (âI.J.â; âJack) Good was a British statistician who worked as a cryptologist at Bletchley Park, with Alan Turing. Born Isadore Jacob Gudak to a Polish-Jewish family in London, he later anglicized his name to Irving John Good and signed his publications âI. J. Good.â

What did he mean by âintelligence explosion?â He was suggesting that if machines even slightly surpassed human intellect, they could improve their own designs in ways unforeseen by their designers, and thus recursively augment themselves into far greater intelligences. The first such improvements might be tiny, but as the machine became more intelligent, it would become better at becoming more intelligent, which could lead to a cascade of self-improvements and a sudden breakthrough to superintelligence (or a singularity).

This made him, after Ulam and von Neumann, an originator of the concept now known as âtechnological singularity,â and so Good served as consultant on supercomputers to Stanley Kubrick, director of the 1968 film 2001: A Space Odyssey. So the notion, in a sense, started with Sir Arthur C. Clarke, and looped around two Poles, and came back to him.

Goodâs Polish-Jewish father was a watchmaker, later managing and owning a successful upscale jewelry shop in London, and was, surprisingly, a notable Yiddish writer under the pen-name of Moshe Oved. He ensured that his son, Isadore Jacob Gudak, was educated at the Haberdashersâ Aske's boys' school in Hampstead, north London, where, Dan van der Vat writes, âGood effortlessly outpaced the mathematics curriculum.â Thatâs what my friends could do, effortlessly outpace mere mortals.

Good studied mathematics at Jesus College, Cambridge, graduating in 1938 and then winning the coveted Smithâs Prize in 1940. He did research under G.H. Hardy, known as the best Mathematician in England, and the Russian Jew Abram Samoilovitch Besicovitch before moving to Bletchley Park in 1941 on completing his doctorate.

On 27 May 1941, having just obtained his doctorate at Cambridge, Good walked into Hut 8, Bletchley's facility for breaking German naval ciphers, for his first shift. This was the day that Britain's Royal Navy destroyed the German battleship Bismarck after it had sunk the Royal Navy's HMS Hood.