-
"[T]he idea of function as a machine is such a powerful and intuitive one that it tends to be used pretty universally until you have a good reason to abandon it. Non-mathematicians rarely encounter such reasons, even in the more mathematically demanding disciplines like physics, computer science, and engineering. In fact, most of the time we tend to double down and promiscuously apply the "function as machine" picture to operators. If a function is a machine that turns numbers into other numbers, and operator is a machine that turns functions into other functions. One such operator is called the Laplace transform, after the french mathematician Pierre-Simon Laplace. But I think we'll stick to calling these posts Sunday Functions, even if we take the occasional look at operators."
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Most textbooks, especially ones not aimed at college math majors, give a definition of "function" that seems quite intuitive. They'll say something along the lines of: a function is a rule that takes an input x and turns it into an output f(x). Formally this isn't quite right - the essence of a…
Scientists and Kool-Aid § Unqualified Offerings
"In my department weâll often produce documents that have lots of buzzwords, but nobody really takes it seriously. You can always get appreciative chuckles in a department meeting if you poke fun at your own handiwork. Higher on the food chain,…
Sunday Function : Built on Facts
One of the most useful functions in math isn't really a function in the usual sense.
(tags: math physics blogs built-on-facts science)
Hitler finds out about another Downfall parody from dawsonbros - Video
"Maybe we should just make one of these ourselves. Do our…
Clive Thompson on Why We Should Learn the Language of Data | Magazine
"Statistics is hard. But that's not just an issue of individual understanding; it's also becoming one of the nation's biggest political problems. We live in a world where the thorniest policy issues increasingly boil down to…