Physics Blogging Round-Up: Books, Entanglement, Optics, Many-Worlds, Two Cultures, and Clocks

A whole bunch of physics posts over at Forbes so far this month:

--Recent Physics Books: Gravitational Waves and Brief Lessons: Short reviews of Janna Levin's Black Hole Blues and Carlo Rovelli's Seven Brief Lessons on Physics.

--The Real Reasons Quantum Entanglement Doesn't Allow Faster-Than-Light Communication: Expanding on and correcting some stuff I didn't like about Ethan "Starts With A Bang" Siegel's take on entanglement as a communications tool.

-- Why Does The Rising sun Change Color?: I watched a bunch of sunrises on the cruise, which led to me scribbling equations, and then a blog post.

-- How Quantum Entanglement Can Help You Understand Many-Worlds: Entanglement is weird, but serves as a nice concrete system for talking about how decoherence hides quantum behavior without requiring "collapse" into a single well-defined state.

-- How Even Research That Sounds Silly Has Value: Kind of a weird thinkpiece, because that's the sort of mood I was in.

-- Why Do Physicists Want A "Nuclear Clock"?: A story about a key step toward making a clock based on a nuclear isomer transition in thorium-229 caught my eye, so I tried to explain why that's cool.

-- Historians and Astronomers Share These Scientific Methods In Common: A neat project based on digitizing ads about fugitive slaves reminded me of some of the things astronomers do, so I wrote about the parallel.

As usual, quite a range of stuff. I'll be at DAMOP all next week, which may or may not allow time for on-site blogging, but will almost certainly give me some topics to write on when I get back.

More like this

Another few weeks of physics blogging at Forbes, collected here for your convenience. -- Commercialization Of Space: Three Cheers For The Mundane: Some belated but brief comments on the SpaceApps conference I went to down in NYC. -- How Studying Atoms On Earth Helps Us Learn About Other Planets: As…
Phillip Ball has a long aggrieved essay about the Many-Worlds Interpretation, which is, as Sean Carroll notes, pretty bad. Ball declares that Many-Worlds is "incoherent, both philosophically and logically," but in fact, he's got this exactly backwards: Many-Worlds is, in fact, a marvel of logical…
I have to admit, I'm writing this one up partly because it lets me use the title reference. It's a cool little paper, though, demonstrating the lengths that physicists will go to in pursuit of precision measurements. I'm just going to pretend I didn't see that dorky post title, and ask what this is…
I need to preface this entry by saying two things. First, I'm no quantum physicist. This is intended to be an introduction for the lay reader. Readers who are well versed in particle physics will no doubt be alarmed by my reductionism. So be it. You have to start somewhere. I would encourage those…