You'd better have your grant submitted already

Rather than funding new grants, most of the fiscal stimulus to NIH will be going to grants that have already been reviewed. From Science Insider:

The National Institutes of Health will dedicate most of its $8.2 billion for research from the economic stimulus bill to funding grant applications it has already received and to supplementing existing grants. A smaller amount, on the order of $100 million to $200 million, will go to new grant applications it receives in the coming months.


...

Because NIH has to spend the stimulus money within those 2 years, it is under pressure to start sending money to grantees as soon as possible. That's why, Kington said, it will not issue a massive call for new applications. Instead, it will mainly look to add money to existing grants and to fund grant applications it has already received and peer reviewed.

Hope you all submitted an R01 last year otherwise this windfall is not for you.

I wonder what this will do to the funding line in the coming two years. Presumably, the baseline funding for NIH provided through the HHS budget will be relatively stable -- because Congress will assume that we are already flush. Will this mean that the funding lines in the coming two years will be the about as strict as they were last year? Is it reasonable to expect Congress to increase the NIH HHS budget right after they gave us $8.5 billion in stimulus?

Further, all of this money is likely to be accompanied by a huge amount of paperwork to prove that jobs have been created.

Tags

More like this

By way of DrugMonkey, we come across NIH's new working group that "will examine the future of the biomedical research workforce in the United States." It's headed by Princeton's Shirley Tilghman, who in a recent interview, said: At the root of the problem is the fact that we are overproducing Ph.D…
First, thanks to everyone who commented. I think DrugMonkey hit the nail on the head: Nevertheless, MtM seems to be calling for a greater proportion of grants to be funded through the Request for Applications mechanism. The key parts of the RFA which distinguish it from the Program Announcement is…
by revere [Since my colleague and new blog sibling Dave Ozonoff posted here some advice on NIH grant writing in response to a post of mine over at Effect Measure, I thought I'd cross-post a follow-up I did on NIH funding a few days later. BTW, Dave, I'll have to give you some lessons in snarkiness…
In the late 1990s congress decided to invest in our future by doubling the NIH budget. If you are a scientist today trying to get an NIH grant, however, you are in tough shape. Success rates are falling like a stone, with less than 20% of grant applications now being funded. It is common to submit…

I have been told that paylines for full 4-5 year R01 grants will not loosen much, if at all, and that what they will do is offer some highly-scored grants outside the nominal payline two years of funding. The reason for this is that they cannot afford to incur out-year commitments to a fuckload of extra 4-5 year grants after the stimulus is gone.

Doesn't it depend on the institute within the NIH?

By ponderingfool (not verified) on 25 Feb 2009 #permalink