Interesting Comparison: Economics and Relativity

I caught this interesting sentence over at Marginal Revolution:

as consumption approaches satiation, workers reduce their hours of work to prevent themselves from actually reaching satiation. More technically, as workers approach satiation, their labor supply curves start to "bend backwards." The result is that rising labor demand stemming from rising productivity raises wages yet reduces employment.

Reminds me of relativity. Thus, one would assume that satiation, like the speed of light, is a level of consumption that a workers can never reach.

I have no idea whether this comparison is apt. Both the economics and the physics are above my pay-grade. The original sentence stems from a question and answer that Bryan Caplan asked on his micro midterm.

More like this

A weird study of men's preference for filled out or thin women is said to show that hungry men prefer heavier women than satiated men. [Researchers] recruited male university students as they entered or exited a campus dining hall during dinner time.
I was well aware that food smells can make us hungry, but thought that the reverse -- smells taking our appetite away -- was limited to the ones that were nauseous or disgusting. Apparently that's not so.
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.

I just found your post because I had the same idea. Not sure whether satiation is the speed of light(~) but I'll keep thinking about it.