Fly Me to the Moon...Again

The Detroit Free Press has an article today detailing the claim by members of Congress that the US is entering a new space race--with China.

When the plans for the new moon missions were unveiled, many journalists and space enthusiasts were disappointed. The plans looked nearly identical to the Apollo missions of thirty years before. It was as if Chevy had announced its new 2006 models and rolled out a '76 Nova. Thirty years on, shouldn't a moon mission look slicker, different, better?

What the people making this criticism have failed to appreciate is that engineering projects suffer from what's been termed "virtual disarmament."

The term comes from anthropologist Hugh Gusterson's paper on weapons science, "The Virtual Weapons Laboratory." When the nuclear program stopped testing and designing atomic weapons, many weapons designers retired or found other work--and as a result the country has literally "forgotten" how to design the more sophisticated nuclear warheads. The same thing has happened to NASA since the end of the space race. Science and engineering programs--particularly complex ones--require a concentration of expertise, which is unsustainable the second a project is over. NASA's accelerated design pace over the first two decades of the space race may have been necessary to match the Russians blow for blow, but it was equally important in keeping intact a brain trust of scientists, engineers and technicians.

At the end of the space race, these people dissipated, and the numbers of those who were trained to take their place diminished. Even the team maintaining the shuttle shrank from 3,000 to 1,800 between 1981 and the time of the Columbia disaster. The return to the moon is a retread, but a necessary one. A new team of experts must be assembled and must retrace the learning curve of the early space program in order to regain the collective experience that has been lost. What's just now beginning to be appreciated is the extent to which the Apollo retread will put other nations like China and India on surprisingly equal footing with the U.S. in the new space race.

Tags

More like this

The NASA logo dates from 1959 and is commonly referred to as the "meatball" logo. The sphere represents a planet, the stars represent space, the red chevron is a wing representing "aeronautics," which was the latest design craze at the time of the logo's invention. The orbiting spacecraft going…
Last November, in Florida, I had the opportunity to see my first Space Shuttle launch. For the hundreds of millions of people who don't pay more than a passing notice to the fact that human beings still go into space on a regular basis, this is a fairly banal thing. But to those who camp out all…
The following is the first in a two-part distillation of a cover story about NASA, politics, and the new power generation that I just finished for the LA Alternative. From this surreal atmosphere, as close to the belt of the equator as we can get in this country, we send people into outer space.…
By Dr. Cynthia Phillips Planetary geologist at the Carl Sagan Center for the Study of Life in the Universe, SETI Institute The final mission of Space Shuttle Atlantis has spawned a whole series of perspective pieces on the history, state, and future of space exploration. Some, like the YouTube…

They '06 Chevys do--and should--look like the '76 Nova. They have four wheels, gas-powered internal combustion engines, etc. I don't think NASA's new moon missions resemble Apollo because engineers need to "retrace the learning curve." I think it's because they got it right the first time.