Science publishing is at a crossroads. On We Beasties, Kevin Bonham says that early scientists "communicated amongst themselves in person or in letters or in books. They shared discoveries freely and it was possible for an individual human to be aware of almost the entire sum of human knowledge." As the pace of discovery accelerated, scientific journals became instrumental in recording and disseminating knowledge. But today, while earnest researchers must "publish or perish," and millions of students stand to benefit from open access, publishers themselves are focused on turning a profit. Bonham debunks the antiquated advantages of classical journals, and envisions a future where "distribution of scientific knowledge returns to the model of the 19th century - free and openly distributed - but now also instantly and globally distributed at the same time." Meanwhile, on Confessions of a Science Librarian, John DuPuis joins the boycott against publisher Elsevier in response to their "excessive commercial avarice" and encourages other librarians to take a stand. And on Aarvarchaeology, Martin Rundkvist outlines his involvement with progressive publishing—and invites us to download his new book, free of charge.
- The Future of Science Publishing on We Beasties
- Elsevier boycott: Time for librarians to rise up! on Confessions of a Science Librarian
- My Recent Mead-halls Book Available On Open Access on Aardvarchaeology
- Elsevier Blinks, Will No Longer Support Research Works Act on Denialism Blog
UPDATE:
Posted to the homepage on February 23, 2012.