DNA: The Web Inside the Strands

Only 1% of the human genome codes for proteins, which might make you wonder what the rest of the nucleotide sequence is good for. In 2012 the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (or ENCODE) announced that a full 80% of the genome played a biochemical role, interacting with proteins in some way. But a new study says it takes only about 8% of our non-protein-coding genes to make us human. This is the percentage of genes that are 'conserved' by the human species: change one of these genes, and you'll alter the fitness of the individual. These genes evolve slowly (although not as slowly as protein-coding genes). The rest of the genome is free to drift about and see what happens.

On Pharyngula, PZ Myers wonders why, when you tame a canine species (thus reducing the size of its adrenal gland), you automatically get floppy ears, spotted coats, and neoteny. PZ Myers says of genes, "everything is tangled together in interacting patterns of connectivity, so you often get unexpected results from single inputs." A new paper argues that an embryonic population of cells known as the neural crest explains why domestication causes changes throughout a mammal's body.

More like this

Science and its interpretation is wonderful. Today I saw a post on Twitter from @LAbizar, referencing an @GEN, post that stated 8.2% of Human DNA is Functional with a link to a GEN article: "Surprise: Only 8.2% of Human DNA Is Functional." The GEN writeup cited a PLoS Genetics article, "8.2% of the…
The seventh part of my lecture notes. Let me know if I made factual errors or if you think this can be improved (from May 15, 2006): -----------------------------------------------How Genotype Affects Phenotype BIO101 - Bora Zivkovic - Lecture 2 - Part 3 One often hears news reports about…
PZ Myers did an excellent job yesterday of dismantling the latest from intelligent-design advocate Jonathan Wells. Wells wrote a piece on WorldNetDaily called "Why Darwinism is Doomed." It is based some new research identifying an important gene involved in the human brain--which I blogged about…
Perhaps. But we do other stuff just like chicken (December 09, 2004): ------------------------------------------------ Fantastic news in science: Researchers compare chicken, human genomeshttp://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-12/nhgr-rcc120804.php Some highlights: Chicks have less junk DNA:…