Zootopia: Unscientific, Racist Family Fun

Would it surprise you to learn that the top movie at the North American box office, a computer-animated family film made for children, is a nakedly racist allegory, a celebration of the urban police state, and an insult to the entire animal kingdom and the natural world at large?

The premise of Zootopia is simple: a country bunny named Judy (yes, she's a rabbit) leaves her parents and her hundreds of siblings behind for a life in the big city. The difference between rural and urban living is the first ugly dichotomy the film establishes: farming carrots with your family is framed as a dead-end for losers, while going to the Big Apple to "follow your dreams" is a heroic aspiration. And what does our sweet, fluffy, young dreamer aspire to be? A cop, of course.

Rabbits aren't the only critters anthropomorphized in the film; most mammals make an appearance playing various social roles. The different species serve as a proxy for old American clichés about race. When Judy is still a schoolchild, there is that one fox kid in town who always harasses her. Worried about the bigger population of foxes in the city, Judy's parents offer her some pepper spray to ward off potential attackers. They acknowledge that they shouldn't be afraid of foxes anymore; in this world, predator species no longer eat prey species; they have been properly assimilated (or whatever) so that all species can coexist in harmony. But it's obvious that despite their lip service, the rabbits are still very afraid of foxes, and Judy takes the spray.

If you pay attention to this scene, it's clear that the script is joking about rural white people fearing urban black people under the guise of rabbits fearing foxes. Although there are almost no foxes (or other predators) living in the country, we're told that there are more in the city—but they're still minorities, making up only 10% of Zootopia's population. The fact that Judy ends up partnered with a fox (and overcoming her prejudice against foxes by working with him) only proves that the narrative foundation of Zootopia is a black-and-white buddy cop movie, regurgitating outdated stereotypes with a wink to the grown-ups, coating everything in sugar and candy colors for the kids. While the fox (a street hustler) is voiced by the whitest dude in Hollywood, and the film plays on racial jokes outside of a strict rabbit/fox dichotomy (you should never touch a sheep's wool without asking!), Zootopia still depends on a basic, deeply problematic association: herbivores are like white people, and predators are like racial minorities.

Even worse: once Judy gets to the city, she discovers that some predators have mysteriously reverted to their "savage" ways (a word the film uses repeatedly), becoming mindless, snarling killing machines who are a menace to public safety. So, um, what the fuck is going on here, Disney? You can't tell me this is really a story about socioeconomic differences or psychological types when the characters know who has the potential for violence (and who doesn't) based solely on physical attributes. You can't tell me this film isn't really about race just because it also portrays bankers as lemmings, or DMV workers as sloths, or the Corleones from The Godfather as shrews.

Aside from the fact that Zootopia is racist, it's also a massive disservice to the truth about biodiversity, evolution, and the natural world at large. Species that humans are driving to extinction for sport, meat, and money are depicted in the movie as happy, multicultural city dwellers. Not surprisingly, we never see an animal in this movie eat lunch, presumably because even the lions are vegan and dependent on the carrot crop from the rubes upstate. In the real world, if a lion doesn't eat meat, it starves to death (unless a dentist shoots it first). In the real world, sloths are one of the coolest mammals around, and they move so slowly because their metabolism runs on tree leaves. In the real world, most humans eat cows, chickens, and/or pigs, which is probably why there aren't any farm animals shown in this movie. Only zoo animals can live together in harmony, and we'll pretend they're like human beings in a city. But would you want to live in a zoo?

Yes it's a kids' movie, and it doesn't have to be scientifically accurate, but no child will learn anything from Zootopia except that urban living is morally superior, the police state is the highest ideal, and even if your neighbors look different from you and they used to be savages, it's OK because they've changed their ways—unless they're on drugs (spoiler alert!), in which case they go violently insane. Devin Faraci, writing a more in-depth review of the movie's racial messaging, describes what happens when the predators are drugged: "they no longer walk on two legs, they lose their intelligence and they start trying to kill tiny fluffy little prey animals. Believe it or not this is all an allegory for the crack epidemic." Super predators, anyone?

But as usual, our hero can fix everything. Judy, despite being so situated in the mainstream, also defies stereotypes in the role of a minority, as the first little bunny on the police force. Her barrier-breaking is really coded feminism, which is fine, but it only detracts from the dilemma of predators living amongst herbivores, and the mixed metaphors lose their meaning. But make no mistake: Judy is the hero of the film, she's a female hero, and she's a white hero.

Ultimately, this movie is either saying: different animal species are like different groups of humans, they just need to get along. Or it's saying different groups of humans are like different animal species, they have intrinsically different biology. Neither of these analogies is true (or acceptable for children). I hope this isn't news to anyone, but unlike different species with different biochemical needs, people with different racial and ethnic backgrounds are actually all the same.

Yet according to Rotten Tomatoes, "the brilliantly well-rounded Zootopia offers a thoughtful, inclusive message that's as rich and timely as its sumptuously state-of-the-art animation."

[Update 11/21/2016: they should have named this film Dystopizoo.]


More like this

There is a monster living in our house. Black and sleek, with nasty, pointy, teeth, it lurks, waiting to deal out death and carnage. Indeed, evidence of its implacable thirst for death was left for me when I returned from Los Angeles late Wednesday night, perhaps left in tribute. Behold, the face…
A drop in the bucket - a massive pile of bison skulls about to be ground into fertilizer, photographed circa 1870. From Wikipedia.From almost the very start, wolves were not welcome in Yellowstone. When the national park was established by the United States government in 1872 the bison population…
The younger Free-Ride offspring's kindergarten class has been discussing rabbits for the last week or so. I can only hope the high school kids have been discussing the molecular structure of theobromine (the main alkaloid in chocolate) and working out the phase of matter of the interior of Peeps…
There was a dead rabbit in the middle of the road today. I suspected such a thing, nearby, just out of sight, and edible, because I noticed some crows taking off whenever a car went by. Then, when I went over, I could see the rabbit that they were feasting on between drive-bys. I had been…

Brilliant Analysis!

By Anonymous (not verified) on 16 Mar 2016 #permalink

I have no intention of seeing this movie, but I'm already scared by what it says about our society.

While I understand wincing at the use of 'savage,' that was deliberate on the films part. There was a time we white people would call non whites 'savages' or 'savage.'
The point is during the reveal, Judy realises even rabbits can be savage. It's something in all of us. The moral of the film is we all have prejudices and we have to work to overcome them, Judy has biases from the beginning - when she carries the fox spray with her - but only truly comes to grips with them at the end.

The film does not call urban living superior, just that Judy wants something different, and she has to overcome parents who encourage her to 'settle hard.' Remember the fox kid who attacked her? He ended up becoming a successful baker - he followed his dreams... while still living in the country.
To Judy, the carrot farm is expected of her and what is seen as her inevitable fate, something she wants to avoid.

You've completely misread the film.


"The point is during the reveal, Judy realises even rabbits can be savage. It’s something in all of us"

Yes but the film undercuts the message by portraying the animals acting out their natural behaviours e.g. sloths are slow, rabbits are hyperactive. Yes, it is true that when any animal is exposed to a stimulus (in the movie, it's drugs), but they are all capable of behaving savagely. The animals are biologically different, and it is only society that suppresses natural instincts.

I found the film disturbing. Are the script writers fans of the human biodiversity research?

What a stupid article. There is this word you might want to learn, "overanalysis". You are spending your time making up nonsense in your head about childrens' movies on a science blog. What even are you doing??

Um, those aren't very good reasons. I mean, granted, this article is pretty bad, but still, these reasons are bad for why it's "wrong." People have been analyzing films a lot, "over analyzing" them, I suppose, but it is clear there is a deeper message. Usually to appeal to adults watching it.

However, there is clear contradictions to this, some that others have already pointed out, but to be honest, the movie is still meant to be interpreted. That much is clear. However, the author has talked to a group before I know and said this is up to interpretation, multiple ones, but that contradicts that he seems to show he has a definite analysis here and he wants to be seemingly the "end all be all."

So it's clear that this movie has a deeper meaning, but this whole "there is no interpretation," "there is one," and "there is multiple interpretations," is insanely wrong and very misguided.

By Shurit (not verified) on 08 Jul 2016 #permalink

In reply to by Sally (not verified)

Excuse me, Please FUCK OFF
As a mother, my daughter learned about how bad racism is in the beginning and how to be less judgemental towards the end. Clearly her intelligence level is higher than yours. Thank you.

This article is a gross misinterpretation of the movie. The producers did an amazing job of showing that anyone can achieve their dreams if they actually try. Is racism and segregation present in this movie? No. How can it be? The animals are all different species, not different races of the same species. "Zootopia" is a wonderful and enjoyable family movie meant to entertain and attempt to have a moral that is woven into the story so well that a child watching it can learn without realizing that they are learning. Of course, to anyone who isn't a child just watching a movie, the morals can be quite obvious, but in no way does "Zootopia" teach children about racism and that urban living is "morally superior". The rabbits living in the rural setting enjoy their life, and hey, one didn't. She, like anyone else, can decide for herself that she wants to change her life and live somewhere where she can feel like she is serving her purpose in the world.

Hrm. I just found this review.

Yes. It's about racism. Yes. It's about prejudice. Yes. It's about irrational fear towards other people who are different..

This. Move. Was. A. Commentary. On. That.