A "balanced" conference?

RP Sr is advertising a "balanced" climate meeting. And why is he so confident of balance? Well, check out the list of organisers and speakers. You could play bingo with them :-).

And if that isn't enough, good ol' Sonja A.Boehmer-Christiansen offers in the comment to publish the results... with friends like that...

More like this

DeSmogBlog has the details. Apparently, "cut-and-paste" Schulte didn't have anything new to say, not even enough for a journal like Energy and Environment to take it. Although, Richard Littlemore's letter discussing his loose use of other researchers contributions might have helped. Here is the…
In 2005 I wrote about a survey of "renowned scientists" conducted by spiked (if you've never heard of spiked, read this) that included 14 global warming skeptics and only three from the mainstream of climate science. Now they've conducted another survey, asking "key thinkers in science, technology…
To mark the centenary of the publication of Einstein's famous equation, Spiked has surveyed over 250 renowned scientists, science communicators, and educators - including 11 Nobel laureates - asking what they would teach the world about science and why, if they could pick just one thing. They…
Naomi Oreskes’ reply to Schulte got me thinking about the journal Energy & Environment, which appears to be the climate science equivalent of Rivista di Biologia (more here on that particular turkey). The journal was founded in 1990 and it offers a home for climate contrarians. According to…

Now, Wm of Borg, you know how important it is to give equal time to both sides. It's how our Corporate MediaTM plays ball over here. Please play by the rules. We must give equal time to the tinfoil hatters to hear their views. Please play by the rules. Resistance is futile.

Best,

D of Borg (assimilated)

Well, there does seem to be at least a scattering of credible "consensus" scientists involved. And I suppose it's fair enough to have an event like this that gives the outliers some kind of forum. But Veizer and Brekke and Essex, oh my.

On the plus side, no Soon or Baliunas so far.

(Dano -- Our corporate media? You mean the one that's been assimilated by Rupert Murdoch? I seem to recall that Blighty has received more than its fair share of that action. But speaking of RM, I always like to quote Harry Shearer when his name comes up: "I used to maintain that (the Simpsons') existence was the one reason not to revoke 'citizen' Rupert's right to plunder this country as his own. Now I'm not so sure.")

By Steve Bloom (not verified) on 16 Mar 2006 #permalink

I'm sure Singer was disappointed that his presentation materials weren't accepted.

I have friends, Steve, who swear by the wisdom imparted by The Simpsons. I don't own a TV, so I can't verify.

Best,

D