Work considered more fun than wikipedia

Or blogging, if it comes to it.

Tags

More like this

You may have missed a mild slam of mine I snuck into the middle of this post yesterday (as well as an earlier one), at a guy who thinks he can dictate to a blogger how to blog and what to blog about. He is reviewing all Seed Sciencebloggers without, apparently, digging through anyone's archives to…
Welcome to part 3 of the Science Blogging 101 series. You can find part 1 here, in which I discussed my own experiences with blogging, and part 2 here, which I discussed some of the big questions regarding audience, purpose, and so forth. How do you balance blogging with the rest of your work?…
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of speaking via Skype with Dan Simons's graduate-level science writing class. We talked about the ins and outs of academic blogging, and the nature and ecosystem of science communication online, and the students asked some terrific questions. I had asked Dan to…
The whole issue of pseudonymity has come up again, both on Google+ and on ScienceBlogs. While I've been on the Internet for nigh on 20 years, my initial point of entry was through a Usenet group that strongly preferred real names (or something real-name-ish). As a result, I've never tried to…