Epic row over the first day (St Neots got Nines 2 quickly) but today it was our turn to get Nines, even more quickly.
Make that up two: St Neots, in the gut, with an oar.
See-also: the final tally.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
We rock. M1 up 3, and the rest of the club did well, so we win the John Jenner trophy for 2013.
Tally for the week:
* day 1: epic row-over n front of Sharks
* day 2: bumped Nines 2
* day 3: bumped St Neots (revenge)
* day 4: bumped Press
Press had a GoPro on a rigger, which sounds like a good idea…
The belated conclusion to the exciting saga of this year's Cambridge town bumps. As you'll recall, yesterday we fell to Press, and today (well, Friday the 25th, I'll date-change the post but this is actually written in August) we went down again, to St Neots, for a net minus one on the week. That'…
Yesterday we rowed over, but discovered that we could leave the crew behind us and most likely catch the crew (Nines 5) that Cantabs 7 dropped for us. And so we did, just under the motorway bridge, which was a pleasantly short row. We had just a teensy tiny little moment of panic on the second…
A somewhat disappointing day today: we rowed well, but only achieved a row-over. Nines 5, as expected, succumbed quickly to Leys behind us, perhaps depriving us of that vital spark of being chased. But while we closed to within a canvas of Cantabs 7 just before Grassy we didn't quite have the oomph…
http://www.examiner.com/list/fashion-faux-pas-to-avoid-on-spring-break/…
[Good point, but we're not on break :-) -W]
That outfit had more issues than socks with sandals.
Also, whats with red sock/green sock guy? looks nautical.
[Port and Starboard, indeed -W]
So, have you stopped interfering with posts on wikipedia or are you still [Now now. Play nicely, children -W]
If you're here from WUWT (and given your level of ignorance you probably are) then you need to be aware what AW is lying to you. See:
* Its all about me (again, yawn)
* A child’s garden of wikipedia, part I
-W]
Nice try [redacted -W] but my comment was far too short for you to judge me, especially my alledged ignorance, whatever that is supposed to mean.
Understand if you will that I do not as you imply come from WUWT or the Koch whatever, but purely as a regular visitor to blogs of all persuasions in an endeavor to update myself on current thinking and opinion.
The question was clear and therefore warrants an answer, if you have the balls of course?
[You can point a septic at a link but you can't make him read it. Much less understand it. And... of course you're here via WUWT. Why are you bothering to lie about that? -W]